search for: insignificantly

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 366 matches for "insignificantly".

Did you mean: insignificant
2011 Nov 23
2
Correlation matrix removing insignificant R values
Hello. I have a large dataset with sales pr month for 56 products with 10 months and i have tried to see how the sales are correlated using cor() This has given me a 56X56 matrix with the R value for each product pair. Most of these correlations are insignificant, and i want only to retain the instances were the R value is significant (for 10 observations it should be above 0.64) Can someone
2012 Nov 21
1
update fit (removing insignificant variables)
HI, I am not sure about the ?update() method. You could try this: set.seed(232) mat1<-matrix(sample(1:100,80,replace=TRUE),ncol=8) #with 8 columns dat1<-data.frame(mat1) ?names(dat1)[1]<-"Y" ?fit<-lm(Y~.,data=dat1) res<-coef(summary(fit)) ?res #???????????????? Estimate Std. Error???? t value?? Pr(>|t|) #(Intercept) 143.763081344 21.9902865? 6.53757200 0.02260698
2009 Jun 13
1
Insignificant variable improves AIC (multinom)?
Hi, I am trying to specify a multinomial logit model using the multinom function from the nnet package. Now I add another independent variable and it halves the AIC as given by summary(multinom()). But when I call Anova(multinom()) from the car package, it tells me that this added variable is insignificant (Pr(>Chisq)=0.39). Thus, the improved AIC suggests to keep the variable but the Anova
2005 Apr 06
1
insignificant factors in regression model
Hi list, I am building a regression model with categorical predictor variable coded by treatment contrasts. The summary of the regression model shows that some levels are significant while others are not. The significant ones show that they are statistically significant from the basis factor (at level 0). How do we generally deal with those insignificant levels? If they are used for
2009 Mar 24
1
Do we have to control for block in block designs if it is insignificant?
I am wondering if in a block experimental design (ex. triple square lattice), the block effect was not significant, is it all right not to include the block effect in an empirical model (even though the sampling was done from different blocks)? Or we are forced to control for the block effect in block designs anyway? Thanks, Julia
2009 Jun 23
1
How to exclude insignificant intercepts using "step" function
I posted this question way down at teh end of another thread realted to an error in step, but that was stupid since it really is another matter altogether. I should have posted it separately, as I have now done. The code below creates a data.frame comprising three marginally noisy surfaces. The code below (including a fix courtesy of David Winsemius that avoids a step function error through use
2004 Jun 08
1
One final minor trivial insignificant pointless patch
[this address is IPv6-only, and usually doesn't work, so don't.] There's another patch I have up my sleeve, that it would be nice if I didn't need to apply it by hand. Look: vorbis-tools/oggenc/encode.c --- encode.c-DIST Fri Jul 19 08:35:48 2002 +++ encode.c Fri Jan 9 07:46:27 2004 @@ -346,7 +342,7 @@ seconds = (int)(remain_time - (double)((int)remain_time/60)*60);
2006 Feb 23
2
Strange p-level for the fixed effect with lme function
Hello, I ran two lme analyses and got expected results. However, I saw something suspicious regarding p-level for fixed effect. Models are the same, only experimental designs differ and, of course, subjects. I am aware that I could done nesting Subjects within Experiments, but it is expected to have much slower RT (reaction time) in the second experiment, since the task is more complex, so it
2009 Mar 15
1
Tukey, planned contrasts or t-test without ANOVA? What is correct?
Dear R community, I compare mean monthly body temperature between two age classes of turtles overwintering underground. lm(body_tem ~ Month*Year*Age_Class) TukeyHSD(aov(body_tem ~ Month*Year*Age_Class, a)) The Tukey HSD as well as the planned contrasts method showed significant differences between the two age classes, but insignificant differences between the two age classes at the same
2020 Aug 22
3
[RFC][LLVM] New Constant type for representing function PLT entries
> -----Original Message----- > From: Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2020 4:04 PM > To: Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com> > Cc: Leonard Chan <leonardchan at google.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC][LLVM] New Constant type for > representing function PLT entries > > On Fri, Aug
2020 Aug 30
2
[RFC][LLVM] New Constant type for representing function PLT entries
On Aug 24, 2020, at 6:47 PM, Leonard Chan via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Thanks for the responses! I’m going to see if I can summarize the concerns and ideas people have (for my own clarity) and see where we can go on from there. Folks seem to be on board with the idea of introducing some new IR entity that (after linking) *could* be a reference into the PLT, but some
2016 Jun 23
3
FSMO / ldbsearch
Hi, After a couple of unfortunate hardware failures and some not insignificant amount of work to rebuild two of my DCs, I am trying to check that things are now working correctly. Looking at the wiki page on FSMO ownership, one suggestion is to run the following ldbsearch command.. but this doesn't work for me. root at dc2:~# ldbsearch --cross-ncs -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b
2020 Aug 21
3
[RFC][LLVM] New Constant type for representing function PLT entries
> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Fangrui > Song via llvm-dev > Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 10:18 PM > To: Leonard Chan <leonardchan at google.com> > Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC][LLVM] New Constant type for > representing function PLT
2005 May 23
1
comparing glm models - lower AIC but insignificant coefficients
Hello, I am a new R user and I am trying to estimate some generalized linear models (glm). I am trying to compare a model with a gaussian distribution and an identity link function, and a poisson model with a log link function. My problem is that while the gaussian model has significantly lower (i.e. "better") AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) most of the coefficients are not
2011 Jun 14
2
[LLVMdev] Avoiding Constant Folding
Hi Cuong, > I am trying to avoid using stack memory (or mutable variable is the term > used in the tutorial). I am also trying to optimize the code as much as I > can before using optimizer passes such as mem2reg (to reduce the compile > time as well). I don't think there is much point in avoiding stack variables (using them makes your life much simpler -> easier to have your
2002 Dec 10
2
incomprehesible quirk
I am really quite puzzled as to why I have to edit smb.conf every time I want to print to the FreeBSD machine from Win2K. (Running FBSD 4.7, samba 2.2.7 and cups 1.1.15.1_4. When I log onto FBSD with username, password, I see the folders for the printers, home, tmp, etc. but no printer. (Only 1 installed - Epson Stylus Color 900). I can access the shares on FBSD from Win2k, but there is no
2008 Mar 13
3
Whitespace in SuperRedCloth
Up to now, the tests have been running with whitespace stripped out. Newlines and tabs are insignificant in HTML, so I figured why bother with them? Now I realize why: they''re significant in pre tags and they also make your code look pretty! I''ve been working to get SRC output to roughly match Tetxile2''s as far as tabs and newlines go. It''s tough and
2009 Sep 30
2
XEN 3.4.1|HVM|physical disk access
Hello folks, i do not get access to a physical disk with xen. I would like to install windows xp as hvm to the physical partition /dev/sdb1. I partioned the disk with cfdisk. Filesystem type is Linux (83). In my eyes the filesystem using hvm is insignificant(?). I tried the following configurations; probably a lot more than this. #disk = [ ''phy:hda1,hda1,r'' ] (comment from
2012 Mar 26
13
blkback global resources
All the resources allocated based on xen_blkif_reqs are global in blkback. While (without having measured anything) I think that this is bad from a QoS perspective (not the least implied from a warning issued by Citrix''es multi-page-ring patches: if (blkif_reqs < BLK_RING_SIZE(order)) printk(KERN_WARNING "WARNING: " "I/O request space (%d reqs) < ring
2009 Jan 13
3
Comparing elements for equality
Suppose I have a dataframe as follows: dat <- data.frame(id = c(1,1,2,2,2), var1 = c(10,10,20,20,25), var2 = c('foo', 'foo', 'foo', 'foobar', 'foo')) Now, if I were to subset by id, such as: > subset(dat, id==1) id var1 var2 1 1 10 foo 2 1 10 foo I can see that the elements in var1 are exactly the same and the elements in var2 are exactly