Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "insertreload".
2012 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Issue with Machine Verifier and earlyclobber
Jakob, one more hint, I've placed some asserts around the code you added
and noticed that the InlineSpiller::insertReload() function is not being
called.
2012/7/14 Borja Ferrer <borja.ferav at gmail.com>
> Hello Jakob,
>
> I'm still getting the error, I can give you any other debug info you need.
> I haven't pasted the regalloc debug info here because it is quite huge, but
> if you tell...
2012 Jul 14
2
[LLVMdev] Issue with Machine Verifier and earlyclobber
Hello Jakob,
I'm still getting the error, I can give you any other debug info you need.
I haven't pasted the regalloc debug info here because it is quite huge, but
if you tell me what specific details you need I will include them.
Thanks for your help!
2012/7/14 Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>
>
> On Jul 14, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Borja Ferrer <borja.ferav at
2014 Aug 22
2
[LLVMdev] Help with definition of subregisters; spill, rematerialization and implicit uses
Hi Quentin,
On 08/19/14 18:58, Quentin Colombet wrote:
[...]
> It seems that you will have to debug further the *** Bad machine code: Instruction loads from dead spill slot *** before we can be of any help.
Yes, I've done some more digging. Sorry for the long mail...
I get:
Inline spilling aN40_0_7:%vreg1954 [5000r,5056r:0)[5056r,5348r:1)
0 at 5000r 1 at 5056r
At this point I have
2012 Jul 15
2
[LLVMdev] Issue with Machine Verifier and earlyclobber
On Jul 15, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Borja Ferrer <borja.ferav at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jakob, one more hint, I've placed some asserts around the code you added and noticed that the InlineSpiller::insertReload() function is not being called.
>
> 2012/7/14 Borja Ferrer <borja.ferav at gmail.com>
> Hello Jakob,
>
> I'm still getting the error, I can give you any other debug info you need. I haven't pasted the regalloc debug info here because it is quite huge, but if you tell...
2017 Jun 29
2
Ok with mismatch between dead-markings in BUNDLE and bundled instructions?
> On Jun 28, 2017, at 5:10 PM, Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Oh wait, vreg1 is indeed used.
> Yeah, having a dead flag here sounds wrong.
I mean on the instruction itself.
On the bundle, that’s debatable. That would fit the semantic “if no side effect you can kill it” (here there is side effect, we define other vregs).
>
>> On