Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "insertref".
Did you mean:
insertdef
2023 Nov 07
2
False positives in check for lost braces (in tools::checkRd())
...ubmit a package to CRAN, I noticed that a check for
lost braces in Rd files (which is enabled in the current r-devel when
checking with the '--as-cran' option) seems to return false positives.
More specifically, a 'Lost braces' NOTE is issued (at least sometimes)
when using the \insertRef{...}{...} command from the Rdpack package.
Since the corresponding changes in r-devel seem to be quite recent
(apparently as of r85196), I hope this sketchy report is sufficient to
track down the problem. If not, I will try to create a reproducible example.
Best regards and many thanks,
Martin...
2023 Nov 07
1
False positives in check for lost braces (in tools::checkRd())
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 17:13:05 +0100
Martin Becker <martin.becker at mx.uni-saarland.de> wrote:
> More specifically, a 'Lost braces' NOTE is issued (at least
> sometimes) when using the \insertRef{...}{...} command from the
> Rdpack package.
Does anything change if you use the development version of Rdpack (not
currently on CRAN)? Apparently, the latest commit performs some changes
to fix the "lost braces" note:
https://github.com/GeoBosh/Rdpack/commit/569ee0515fce00eac98ef45e6...
2023 Nov 07
1
False positives in check for lost braces (in tools::checkRd())
...N, I noticed that a check for
> lost braces in Rd files (which is enabled in the current r-devel when
> checking with the '--as-cran' option) seems to return false positives.
>
> More specifically, a 'Lost braces' NOTE is issued (at least sometimes)
> when using the \insertRef{...}{...} command from the Rdpack package.
>
> Since the corresponding changes in r-devel seem to be quite recent
> (apparently as of r85196), I hope this sketchy report is sufficient to
> track down the problem. If not, I will try to create a reproducible example.
>
> Best rega...