search for: insertdebugvalu

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "insertdebugvalu".

Did you mean: insertdebugvalue
2011 Oct 11
1
[LLVMdev] Expected behavior of eliminateFrameIndex() on dbg_value machine instructions
...eLocation Location(FrameReg, Offset); addVariableAddress(DV, VariableDie, Location); If the intention is to handle the case where the target doesn't implement emitFrameIndexDebugValue(), then there is a mismatch between the operands it expects and the operands added in UserValue::insertDebugValue(). I've attached a patch which fixes this. Does this look correct to you? > The target's eliminateFrameIndex() should be able to handle any DBG_VALUE instructions created by this hook. > > If you don't implement the hook, you will get DBG_VALUE instructions with just a FrameI...
2011 Oct 10
0
[LLVMdev] Expected behavior of eliminateFrameIndex() on dbg_value machine instructions
On Oct 10, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Richard Osborne wrote: > I'm investigating a bug associated with debug information that manifests > itself in the XCore backend (PR11105). I'd like to understand what the > expected behavior of eliminateFrameIndex() is when it is called on a > dbg_value machine instruction. That is up to the target. The TII::emitFrameIndexDebugValue() hook is
2011 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] Expected behavior of eliminateFrameIndex() on dbg_value machine instructions
I'm investigating a bug associated with debug information that manifests itself in the XCore backend (PR11105). I'd like to understand what the expected behavior of eliminateFrameIndex() is when it is called on a dbg_value machine instruction. Currently the XCore target replaces the frame index with the frame register and sets the next operand to the byte offset from the frame