search for: inria

...39;m still keeping a samba servers to make my cups-managed printers available to windows users, rather than duplicating configuration with a Windows print service. But I'm facing two problems, probably due to the way we manage AD. First, all my host belong to a Unix-managed DNS domain (msr-inria.inria.fr), not to the windows-managed one corresponding to the AD realm (msr-inria.idf). It means resolving their IP address result in foo.msr-inria.inria.fr, not in foo.msr-inria.idf. The Unix DNS is a secondary server for the foo.msr-inria.idf, meaning SRV record lookup still works. But all C...

...perfectly. Now I got a new shiny samba server acting as a print server only, member of an AD domain, and I can't have the members of 'Domain admins' group manage printing drivers on the server, whereas the Administrator account can. Here is my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = MSR-INRIA realm = MSR-INRIA.IDF security = ads printcap name = cups load printers = yes printing = cups ... [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no guest ok = yes writable = no printable = yes create mode = 0700 pr...

Hi Minas, Basically, you should not have any difference between the two projects :) (it's not really the case, but we are working on this problem). To explain (sorry for my long email!), I work for a french research institution (Inria) and, as we have an Inria research project around VMKit, I had to create a repository inside my institution (a researcher has always to make his institution happy:)). At the beginning (6 month ago), it was more easy to have two different repositories, one with a stable version hosted by llvm, the...

...ace the new VMKit2 fork was been created? Thanks for answer :) Best regards, Minas On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Harris Bakiras <h.bakiras at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > For the moment you can install VMKit following these instructions: > > http://vmkit2.gforge.inria.fr/start.php > > VMKit's web page and repository will be updated soon. > > Harris Bakiras > > Le 12/02/2013 10:30, chris.gray at kiffer.be a écrit : > >> Hi all, >> >> I hope this is the correct place to post such questions? I am building >> vmkit f...

Hello. I have a print server member of an AD domain, and my users are autenthicated through an external kerberos domain. My samba server FQDN is 'etoile.msr-inria.inria.fr', and has 'cups.msr-inria.inria.fr' as DNS alias. For foreign visitors, everything works fine: when attempting to reach \\cups, samba immediatly detect from given credentials than user comes from an unknown domains, and immediatly give him guest access. That's the desi...

Hello Dear LLVM Developers and Users I would like to complain about scientific inaccuracy of the paper http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf written by Nicolas Geoffray, Gaël Thomas, Charles Clément, Bertil Folliot, Gilles Muller and presentation done by Nicolas Geoffray on LLVM conference supported by Google: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf They provide comparison of their s...

On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:25 AM, Kirill Kononenko wrote: > Hello Dear LLVM Developers and Users Hi Kirill, Please talk to Nicholas about this, thanks! -Chris > > > I would like to complain about scientific inaccuracy of the paper > http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf written by > Nicolas Geoffray, Gaël Thomas, Charles Clément, Bertil Folliot, Gilles > Muller and presentation done by Nicolas Geoffray on LLVM conference > supported by Google: > http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf > > They...

I've set up a public LNT server to show the result of perf stat. There is a huge improvement compared with timeit tool. http://parkas16.inria.fr:8000/ Patch is updated to pin the process to a single core, the readings are even more accurate. It's hard coded to run everything on core 0, so don't run parallel testing with it for now. The tool now depends on Linux perf and schedtool. I'm running tests on ARM Cortex boards to v...

on 2013/3/1 6:11, Gaël Thomas wrote: > > Fundamentally, I think that for the VMKit project, it's important to > be hosted as a subproject of llvm because VMKit heavily relies on llvm > (and because llvm is maybe a little bit more attractive than inria:)). > So, we will quickly re-merge the two projects and continuously > integrates the stable (and interesting) contributions of the inria > research project inside the llvm repository. We will also merge the > web pages and forget this stupid idea of VMKit2 (I will still keep a > sep...

...~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Romain FRANCOIS - http://addictedtor.free.fr ~~~~~~ ~~~~ Etudiant ISUP - CS3 - Industrie et Services ~~~~ ~~ http://www.isup.cicrp.jussieu.fr/ ~~ ~~~~ Stagiaire INRIA Futurs - Equipe SELECT ~~~~ ~~~~~~ http://www.inria.fr/recherche/equipes/select.fr.html ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~

On Apr 20, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Kirill Kononenko wrote: > Dear all, > > > This new version of the paper at: > > http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/36/53/37/PDF/RR-6799.pdf > > got ride of libJIT. Now my question is the how scientific is this > research and research paper if instead of using libJIT and > Portable.NET JIT: > authors of "VMKit: a Substrate

Hi Chris How does this has nothing to do with llvm? Is not the VMKit project an official part of LLVM? Thanks, Kirill -- http://code.google.com/p/libjit-linear-scan-register-allocator/

...ormance. Nathan will be demoing an RFC he plans to send out later that day. [0] https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=google.com_bbf8m6m4n8nq5p2bfjpele0n5s%40group.calendar.google.com [1] https://meet.google.com/yjf-jyqk-iaz [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBghs-cwQX4 [3] https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02147012v2/document [4] https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02314830/document [5] https://www.mathieuacher.com/ -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers

...> Just in case that this information does not get corrupted I want to >> point to the issue: >> >> >> In http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf it is on >> page 21: "VMKit, Mono, PNet", Array bounds checks. >> >> In http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf it is on page >> 17: "We compare N3 with Mono [9] version 1.2.6, and PNet version 0.7.4 >> [2], which uses libjit as dynamic compiler...." >> This statement is false. PNet version 0.7.4 has not been using LibJIT. >> It has been u...

On 20 May 2014 16:40, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 20/05/2014 16:01, Yi Kong wrote: >> >> I've set up a public LNT server to show the result of perf stat. There >> is a huge improvement compared with timeit tool. >> http://parkas16.inria.fr:8000/ > > > Hi Yi Kong, > > thanks for testing these changes. > > >> Patch is updated to pin the process to a single core, the readings are >> even more accurate. It's hard coded to run everything on core 0, so >> don't run parallel testing with it...

Hi Chris, Just in case that this information does not get corrupted I want to point to the issue: In http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf it is on page 21: "VMKit, Mono, PNet", Array bounds checks. In http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf it is on page 17: "We compare N3 with Mono [9] version 1.2.6, and PNet version 0.7.4 [2], which uses libjit as dynamic compiler...." This statement is false. PNet version 0.7.4 has not been using LibJIT. It has been using an unroller. "The PNet pe...

...e: > Hi Chris, > > > Just in case that this information does not get corrupted I want to > point to the issue: > > > In http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf it is on > page 21: "VMKit, Mono, PNet", Array bounds checks. > > In http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf it is on page > 17: "We compare N3 with Mono [9] version 1.2.6, and PNet version 0.7.4 > [2], which uses libjit as dynamic compiler...." > This statement is false. PNet version 0.7.4 has not been using LibJIT. > It has been using an unroller...

Hello, Our project is the FORMES project at LIAMA, the sino french laboratory, a cooperation project between INRIA in France and Tsinghua University in China. See http://liama.ia.ac.cn/wiki/projects:formes:menu One part of this project is processor simulation. We want to develop a translator from machine code to Intel x86, using LLVM as intermediate language. We have a post-doc position opened on this topic...

...~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Romain FRANCOIS - http://addictedtor.free.fr ~~~~~~ ~~~~ Etudiant ISUP - CS3 - Industrie et Services ~~~~ ~~ http://www.isup.cicrp.jussieu.fr/ ~~ ~~~~ Stagiaire INRIA Futurs - Equipe SELECT ~~~~ ~~~~~~ http://www.inria.fr/recherche/equipes/select.fr.html ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~

...t;Does the above modification seem right to the experts?” Two supplementary points, if I may. Do you advise -ai or -avi? And why do you prefer one over the other? I don’t understand the line of rsync output that reads .d..t...... ./ David > On 23 Feb 2017, at 17:02, <Francis.Montagnac at inria.fr> <Francis.Montagnac at inria.fr> wrote: > > > Hi. > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 11:07:16 -0500 Kevin Korb wrote: > >> I hate to say it because it goes against my normal advice but this is >> one instance where using a * in the source parameter would help... &...