search for: inputplus

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:36:23 +0100 Ralph Corderoy <ralph at inputplus.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > So if i'm using the JIT then it will generate a switch table ? How > > can i test this, since i've been examining the native assembly output > > (is this 'pic' mode?) of llc. > > Presumably the JIT means you...

Às 14:46 de 27/07/2019, Ilia Mirkin escreveu: > On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 7:37 AM Ralph Corderoy <ralph at inputplus.co.uk> wrote: >> The video plays, CPU load is less (my aim), but there's ‘tearing’ of the >> picture as if small rectangles that are updates are appearing in the >> wrong location, off by a little. If I step through the frames with >> mpv's ‘.’ and ‘,’ then I'...

Hi, I'm having trouble with hardware decoding of video with mpv(1) having switched from Nvidia's proprietary driver to nouveau due to Arch Linux removing its nvidia-340xx package. The machine is an Acer Revo. $ lspci -nn | grep VGA 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation GT218 [ION] [10de:0a64] (rev a2) I think this is codename NVA8 with the

On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 7:37 AM Ralph Corderoy <ralph at inputplus.co.uk> wrote: > The video plays, CPU load is less (my aim), but there's ‘tearing’ of the > picture as if small rectangles that are updates are appearing in the > wrong location, off by a little. If I step through the frames with > mpv's ‘.’ and ‘,’ then I've found a patt...

Hi Simon, > So if i'm using the JIT then it will generate a switch table ? How > can i test this, since i've been examining the native assembly output > (is this 'pic' mode?) of llc. Presumably the JIT means you end up with a `function pointer' that you call to execute the just built code? Can't you just save a lump of memory starting at that address to a file

Hi Simon, > > objdump's -i option will show you the available file formats, one's > > normally `binary' or something similar. > > I've had a look at this, and it's not yielding any results so far. > Surely objdump expects an elf header, symbol table, etc. ? Try objdump -D -b binary -m i386 /etc/passwd objdump is happy to treat a file of bytes as

Hi Rafael, > I am trying to add support for select_cc. In ARM it can be implemented > with: > > mov $dst, $falseVal > cmp $a, $b > moveq $dst, $trueVal The more normal ARM code, as produced by assembly writers and compilers that I've seen, is cmp $a, $b moveq $dst, $trueVal movne $dst, $falseVal e.g. at the end of a function returning r0 orr r0, r0, #0x40

Hi Chris, > 2. The main deficiencies of CVS don't impact us much (we aren't > hampered by lack of atomic commits, renames, and better branch > facilities). If people would like to see the logical `patch set' that made up a CVS commit then cvsps may be useful, or, as others have said, use Tailor to convert to a local repos. in your preferred format.

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Bill Wendling wrote: > Perhaps someone could come up with a list of different versioning > software, list the pros and cons, and then we could vote? (Has anyone > mentioned Bitkeeper yet? :-) There are a couple reasons we are using CVS still: 1. CVS works and is well understood by all involved. 2. The main deficiencies of CVS don't impact us much (we aren't

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:53:56 -0500 (CDT) Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Simon Burton wrote: > > Is it possible to take the address > > of a basic block ? > > Nope. > > > I'd like to put a whole bunch of these > > addresses into an array, and then select > > one to branch to. Eg. like a switch statement. >

I am trying to add support for select_cc. In ARM it can be implemented with: mov $dst, $falseVal cmp $a, $b moveq $dst, $trueVal My current strategy is to expand select_cc in two ARM nodes: ARM::SELECT and ARM::CMP. The two nodes would be connected by a flag edge. ARM::CMP would then expand to "cmp $a, $b". This instruction has no results. It only alters the CPSR (current program

Hi Ilia, A fortnight ago, you wrote: > > The video plays, CPU load is less (my aim), but there's ‘tearing’ of > > the picture as if small rectangles that are updates are appearing in > > the wrong location, off by a little. If I step through the frames > > with mpv's ‘.’ and ‘,’ then I've found a pattern: one frame's > > picture is good, followed by

Hi Tilmann, > Nevertheless, it is unlikely that llvm-qemu will ever be much faster > than regular qemu (by replacing its code generator completely, which > it currently does), which is due to the fact that regular qemu has a > very lightweight code generator (it basically only copies blocks of > memory and performs some patching to them and only does static > register

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11338 Bug ID: 11338 Summary: Rsync Crash - Segmentation fault Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

Hi, I'm slowly getting to grips with what makes up LLVM. I intend to use it in a machine simulator, e.g. processor, clock, RAM, UART, and other devices, where the processor will be one of several. It would take a block of target instructions, e.g. ARM, and produce LLVM to simulate those on the target machine state, and then JIT them to host instructions and then execute. The peripheral

Hi, We'd like sshd to listen on port 22 with PasswordAuthentication = no and port 2222 with PasswordAuthentication = yes. At the moment, it seems the only way to do this is to run two sshds, one per port. Since Match blocks already allow PasswordAuthentication to be set, if the Match keyword itself allowed testing of the server port to which the incoming connection was made then we could do

Hi, > I hope this brief tutorial has helped. Feel free to ask questions. > Further details can be found in Makefile.rules. Although I don't think it uses automake, chapter 13 of http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/autobook/autobook_toc.html may still be useful since it gives a similar overview. Cheers, Ralph.

Hi Chris, > Of interest may be this thesis. It talks about converting alpha code > to LLVM (among other things): > http://llvm.org/pubs/2004-05-JoshiMSThesis.html Thanks, it was of interest. I didn't spot its relevance from the title. Cheers, Ralph.

Hi Tom, > I didn't dig into the Makefiles... are the libraries and whatnot built > -fPIC? If you do `make Verb=' then you'll see all the actual command invocations and can grep for bits of interest. Cheers, Ralph.

Hi, $ g -1 '^Module' StackerParser.y /* A module is just a DefinitionList */ Module : { SCI->handle_module_start( ); } DefinitionList { $$ = SCI->handle_module_end( $2 ); } ; $ It's been years since I was heavily into yacc, but shouldn't it be s/$2/$1/? Cheers, Ralph.