search for: input_values

I have a google spreadsheet with a column of hyperlinks I want the URL from. The googlesheets package can return this information with gs_read_cellfeed(), but it needs to be reshaped with gs_reshape_cellfeed(). Problem is, gs_reshape_cellfeed() returns the 'value' of the cells, not the 'input_value' making it exactly like gs_read(). How do I extract input_value from a cell feed

Dear all, I am trying to write figures directly to a file using the jpeg() function. this_ylab=expression(paste("P",sep="")~lambda) this_xlab=expression(rho) jpeg("file_name.jpeg",width=100,height=100,units="mm",res=300) plot(input_values,output_values,pch=16,cex=cex_pt,xlab="",frame.plot=T,ann=F,axes=F) axis(side=2) axis(side=1,labels=T,xlab="") mtext(this_xlab,side=1,line=4,cex=2) mtext(this_ylab,side=2,line=3,cex=2) dev.off() However, I get the following error message: Error in mtext(this_xlab, side = 1, l...

- refactor memoization code - pass pod as stdin rather than files Pino Toscano (3): generator: isolate memoized cache in own module generator: adjust variable names generator: improve pod2text invocation generator/Makefile.am | 3 ++ generator/memoized_cache.ml | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++ generator/memoized_cache.mli | 29 ++++++++++ generator/utils.ml | 101

These safe wrappers around Pervasives.open_in and Pervasives.open_out ensure that exceptions escaping cannot leave unclosed files. --- common/mlstdutils/std_utils.ml | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------- common/mlstdutils/std_utils.mli | 12 +++++++++++ common/mltools/tools_utils.ml | 39 +++++++++++++++++----------------- dib/dib.ml | 9 ++++----

This change allows parts of the daemon to be written in the OCaml programming language. I am using the ‘Main Program in C’ method along with ‘-output-obj’ to create an object file from the OCaml code / runtime, as described here: https://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/intfc.html Furthermore, change the generator to allow individual APIs to be implemented in OCaml. This is picked by

This patch series is just FYI at the moment. However it does pass the tests. The daemon is a self-contained program. We don't need to write it all in C. Writing parts of it in OCaml would make it simpler and less error-prone. In particular if the daemon was written in a more sane programming language then we could move the inspection code to run entirely inside the appliance, which would

This change allows parts of the daemon to be written in the OCaml programming language. I am using the ‘Main Program in C’ method along with ‘-output-obj’ to create an object file from the OCaml code / runtime, as described here: https://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/intfc.html Furthermore, change the generator to allow individual APIs to be implemented in OCaml. This is picked by

Version 1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00003.html This patch series reimplements a few more APIs in OCaml, including some very important core APIs like ?list_filesystems? and ?mount?. All the tests pass after this. The selection of APIs that I have moved may look a little random, but in fact they are all APIs consumed by the inspection code (and some more

v2 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00008.html This series gets as far as a working (and faster) reimplementation of ‘guestfs_list_filesystems’. I also have another patch series on top of this one which reimplements the inspection APIs inside the daemon, but that needs a bit more work still, since inspection turns out to be a very large piece of code. Rich.

I think this fixes everything mentioned: - Added the Optgroups module as suggested. - Remove command temporary files. - Replace command ~flags with ?fold_stdout_on_stderr. - Nest _with_mounted function. - Rebase & retest. Rich.

v1 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html This series now depends on two small patches which I posted separately: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html v1 -> v2: - Previously changes to generator/daemon.ml were made incrementally through the patch

Previously posted as part of the mega utilities/inspection series here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00232.html What I've done is to extract just the parts related to rewriting daemon APIs in OCaml, rebase them on top of the current master, fix a few things, and recompile and test everything. Rich.

This is a combination of: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00046.html [PATCH 00/12] Refactor utility functions. plus: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00023.html [PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml. with the second patches rebased on top of the utility refactoring, and some other adjustments and extensions. This passes

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid