Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "inpection".
Did you mean:
injection
2020 Sep 08
1
failing automatic incoming check
Hello,
I got a notification regarding a failure to pass incoming checks
automatically after a CRAN submission. The details are given here:
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/diveMove_1.5.0_20200908_191325/
The only visible issue is a NOTE from the macosx build, with the very
terse:
"No Protocol Specified"
My searches suggest this can be ignored, but it would be nice
2006 May 06
1
Ajax commenting - PLEASE HELP!!!!
I''m trying to post comments using Ajax. It seems that I have an
infinite loop somewhere, because it hangs on the return from the Ajax
call. The comment does get saved to the DB, but I have to refresh the
page for it to show.
The reason I know it''s some sort of infinite loop, is because I''m
showing a "loading.gif" image, and it never goes away. Plus, if
2020 Sep 09
3
more Matrix weirdness
...t; The only visible issue is a NOTE from the macosx build, with the very
> terse:
>
> "No Protocol Specified"
>
> My searches suggest this can be ignored, but it would be nice to squash
> it. Any tips welcome.
>
For some reason this should hgave undergone manual inpection but got
auto rejected. Ideally you would reduce the test timing so that the
overall check time is less than 10 min .
Best,
Uwe Ligges
------------------------------
Message: 22
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:48:40 +1000
From: Hugh Parsonage <hugh.parsonage at gmail.com>
To: Jeroen Ooms <...
2020 Sep 10
0
more Matrix weirdness
...th the very terse:
>>
>> "No Protocol Specified"
>>
>> My searches suggest this can be ignored, but it would be
>> nice to squash it. Any tips welcome.
>>
> For some reason this should hgave undergone manual
> inpection but got auto rejected. Ideally you would reduce
> the test timing so that the overall check time is less
> than 10 min .
> Best, Uwe Ligges
> ------------------------------
> Message: 22 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:48:40 +1000 From:
> Hugh Parsonage <...
2015 Dec 02
3
[PATCH 0/3] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
...etect many
different Linux distributions, Windows, BSD, and others. The currently
mounted root filesystem is ignored, since when running under
libguestfs, that filesystem is part of the libguestfs appliance (this
is the main difference compared to programs like facter).
Guestfs-inpection is written in C, but most of the C is generated by a
rules compiler from a set of inspection rules written in a more
compact, declarative, Prolog-inspired language. If you want to write or
modify the rules, see "WRITING RULES" below.
OPTIONS
-?
--help
Display...
2016 Feb 23
4
[PATCH v3 0/4] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
Previously posted:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-December/msg00038.html
Inspection now really succeeds on a small number of simple guests.
To test it out:
$ ./run guestfish -v -x -a /tmp/centos-6.img
><fs> run
><fs> debug sh "guestfs-inspection --verbose"
Rich.
2015 Dec 05
6
[PATCH 0/6 v2] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
This is a more working version. Inspection (partially) succeeds on a
real guest this time :-)
You can test it out on a real guest (in this case, a CentOS disk image
located at /tmp/centos-6.img) by doing:
$ ./run guestfish -v -x -a /tmp/centos-6.img
><fs> run
><fs> debug sh "guestfs-inspection --verbose"
which will print lots of debugging, and at the end the
2016 Jan 21
8
[PATCH v3 0/6] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
For background on this change, see:
https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2015/12/06/inspection-now-with-added-prolog/
v2 was previously posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-December/msg00038.html
To test this patch series on a real guest, you can do:
$ ./run guestfish -v -x -a /var/tmp/centos-6.img
><fs> run
><fs> debug sh "guestfs-inspection