Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "inparticular".
Did you mean:
imparticular
2006 May 02
1
Cluster validation methods
Hi All,
Except the "Rand Index", "Dunn Index" and "Silhouette width", are there
other cluster validation methods in R? Could you please also specify the
function?
Thanks!
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2001 Sep 19
1
Fwd: Re: Define conflict between ext3 and raid patches against 2.2.19
...ing to apply raid-2.2.19-A1, and I get one reject in
> > > include/linux/fs.h.
> >
> > You should be aware that ext3 (and other journalling filesystems) do
> > not work reliably over RAID1 or RAID5 in 2.2. Inparticular, you can
> > get problems when the array is rebuilding/resyncing.
> >
> > But if you only plan to use ext3 with raid0 or linear, you should be
> > fine.
> >
>
> Can you point me to an archive that describes how to trigger this bug?
>
> Was it in linux-r...
2003 Feb 22
2
4-parameter logistic model
Dear R users
I'm a new user of R and I have a basic question about the 4-parameter
logistic model. According to the information from Pinheiro & Bates the model
is:
y(x)=theta1+(theta2-theta1)/(1+exp((theta3-x)/theta4)) ==
y(x)=A+(B-A)/(1+exp((xmid-input)/scal))
from the graph in page 518 of the book of the same authors (mixed models in
S) theta 1 corresponds to the horizontal asymptote
2003 Nov 07
19
Permissions
Hi Group,
I set up samba3.0 to work as ADS-Member-Server.
I created a share called /test and chown group to gg_test to it.
Access to share works without any problems. I also can add files and
directories to this share.
When I now make ln -l, the files I added got the group-permissions "Domain
Users" and not gg_test, as I expected.
Do someone know a solution?
Thanks in advance.