Displaying 20 results from an estimated 683 matches for "inotify".
Did you mean:
notify
2020 Mar 31
3
limit for user exceeded
Hi
System debian 8.11 dovecot-2.2.36.4 and I have some warnings in log likes:
Warning: Inotify watch limit for user exceeded, disabling. Increase
/proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches
cat /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches
8192
in sysctl i change
#fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 8192
#fs.inotify.max_user_instances = 16384
fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 16384
fs.inotify.max_user_instances...
2007 Nov 02
2
*notify config for 1.0.x doesn't enable inotify
hi,
the current code has changed include linux/inotify.h to sys/inotify.h since
2006-01-17, but that won't work with inotify*.h as documented in the wiki.
One has to either revert back to linux/inotify.h, or add
#include <sys/inotify-syscalls.h>
to both configure.in and src/lib/ioloop-notify-inotify.c
Or, just symlink sys/inotify.h ->...
2005 Dec 11
1
inotify.h not found
Hi,
dovecot (1.0.alpha5) won't compile with inotify support because
inotify.h can't be found. I'm running Linux 2.6.15-rc5 with headers
from 2.6.12 (like most vendors). I've noticed that beagle and other
inotify-enabled applications ships with an inotify.h. Could this be
scheduled for alpha6? :-)
2015 Jun 10
3
Failed to init inotify - Too many open files
Hello,
I've a problem on my system with inotify.
In the smbd logfile are shown a lot messages like this:
[2015/06/10 11:15:21.644453, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100),
real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_inotify.c:297(inotify_setup) Failed to init
inotify - Too many open files
[2015/06/10 11:15:23.968497, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100),
real(0,...
2008 Sep 17
1
[PATCH] linux/inotify.h: do not include <linux/fcntl.h> in userspace
...ill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > >> What is the error message?
> > > >
> > > > /usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h:117: error: redefinition of 'struct
> > > > flock'
> > >
> > > And? None of these programs should use <linux/inotify.h>. There has
> > > for the longest time been a <sys/inotify.h> header which doesn't need
> > > any kernel headers. In fact, <linux/inotify.h> should not be exported.
> >
> > Even if userspace applications shouldn't use it directly this doesn&...
2005 Jul 23
2
inotify support in dovecot
Hi,
I note that dovecot supported inotify from -test77, and now the Linux kernel
supports it starting from linux-2.6.13-rc3. So in theory I should be set to
go. I'm using an -mm kernel, and it was built with inotify, on FC4/devel.
However when trying to build with it using --with-notify=inotify, I always
seem to be getting this m...
2006 Jan 23
1
Compiling Dovecot with-notify=inotify
Hi,
I'm trying to compile Dovecot beta2 with inotify support, but this is
unsuccessfull.
First, it seems that the configure script is looking for inotify.h in
/usr/include/sys, whereas it is in /usr/include/linux on my Debian Sarge
system. But that's a minor point, let's make a symlink.
% dpkg -S /usr/include/linux/inotify.h
linux-kernel-he...
2020 Mar 31
0
limit for user exceeded
Hi
I Dont understand or? I im thinking wrong:
process_limit = 25000
Older:
#fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 8192
#fs.inotify.max_user_instances = 16384
New:
fs.inotify.max_user_instances = 8192
?
fs.inotify.max_user_watches= process_limit x 2 + fs.inotify.max_user_instances
fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 58192
On 31.03.2020 13:44, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> I would prefer replies on the lis...
2005 Aug 22
2
Re: Dovecot inotify problem
Hi Reuben,
I hope you don't mind me copying the dovecot list again.
> dovecot: Aug 21 04:08:22 Error: IMAP(reuben): inotify_rm_watch() failed:
> Invalid argument
Odd.
> This is with a 2.6.13-rc6-mm1 release. I've posted to LKML because there is
> also a kernel stack produced at one point which looks inotify related (but the
> messages above are contant).
> See http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/li...
2018 May 03
3
@devel - Why no inotify?
There is the ability to notify the client already. If you developed against libgfapi you could do it (I think).
On May 3, 2018 9:28:43 AM PDT, lemonnierk at ulrar.net wrote:
>Hey,
>
>I thought about it a while back, haven't actually done it but I assume
>using inotify on the brick should work, at least in replica volumes
>(disperse probably wouldn't, you wouldn't get all events or you'd need
>to make sure your inotify runs on every brick). Then from there you
>could notify your clients, not ideal, but that should work.
>
>I agree that...
2005 Aug 08
3
[PATCH] add inotify system calls
I've added this to our klibc copy in the udev tree to support
the recently added Inotify.
Thanks,
Kay
-------------- next part --------------
diff --git a/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def b/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def
--- a/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def
+++ b/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def
@@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ int lchown32,lchown::lchown(const char *
int getcwd::__getcwd(char *, size_t)
<?> int utim...
2011 Apr 01
1
inotify and network/cluster filesystems
(dovecot v1.2.16)
I've notice the log notices about increasing
/proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances on my servers, and started
wondering if inotify works for network/cluster filesystems..
I found this:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=311194
which says that there's no mechanism for one node to tell another node
that a directory changed for G...
2018 May 03
3
@devel - Why no inotify?
hi guys
will we have gluster with inotify? some point / never?
thanks, L.
2010 Mar 11
1
Failed to init inotify
Hi,
I'm going through my messages log and I've noticed a large amount of the
following error going on.
What affect would this have on the smb client that is connected to those
pid's?
Mar 11 11:35:24 process1 smbd[25349]: [2010/03/11 11:35:24, 0]
smbd/notify_inotify.c:293(inotify_setup)
Mar 11 11:35:24 process1 smbd[25349]: Failed to init inotify - Too
many open files
Mar 11 11:35:24 process1 smbd[25349]: [2010/03/11 11:35:24, 0]
smbd/notify_inotify.c:293(inotify_setup)
Mar 11 11:35:24 process1 smbd[25349]: Failed to init inotify - Too
many open files...
2009 May 27
2
Inotify instance limit for user exceeded, disabling?
I'm seeing this message in my /var/log/maillog:
May 26 12:35:00 agencymail dovecot: IMAP(info at example.com): Inotify
instance limit for user exceeded, disabling. Increase
/proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances
I rummaged through google, and found :
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2008-May/011132.html
which says I need to increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances
(no surprise given the error m...
2013 Nov 29
1
Samba4 git pull of today (11/28/2013) link error on FreeBSD 9.2 RELEASE
./configure --bundled-libraries && make
............
[3638/3880] Linking default/source4/lib/policy/py-policy.so
[3639/3880] Linking default/source4/auth/ntlm/libauth4.so
[3640/3880] Linking default/source4/ntvfs/libntvfs.so
default/source4/ntvfs/sysdep/inotify_1.o: In function `inotify_setup':
inotify.c:(.text+0x503): undefined reference to `inotify_init'
default/source4/ntvfs/sysdep/inotify_1.o: In function `watch_destructor':
inotify.c:(.text+0x883): undefined reference to `inotify_rm_watch'
default/source4/ntvfs/sysdep/inotify_1.o: In...
2007 Aug 12
7
IDLE with inotify problem
...I set mailbox_idle_check_interval = 1 and i now
get the same behaviour as with couier (a new mail immediately causes
a notification) but i am not sure that this is the right solution.
Reading the comments in the config files I was under the impression
that this is not needed if dovecot uses inotify.
Setup:
Kernel 2.6.22.1 with inotify
dovecot 1.0.3 from debian unstable
Build options: ioloop=epoll notify=inotify ipv6 openssl
So my question is can I check that dovecot is actually using inotify?
Kind regards,
Michael
2018 May 22
0
@devel - Why no inotify?
how about gluste's own client(s)?
You mount volume (locally to the server) via autofs/fstab
and watch for inotify on that mountpoing(or path inside it).
That is something I expected was out-of-box.
On 03/05/18 17:44, Joe Julian wrote:
> There is the ability to notify the client already. If you
> developed against libgfapi you could do it (I think).
>
> On May 3, 2018 9:28:43 AM PDT, lemonnierk at...
2009 Feb 05
3
NFS - inotify vs kqueue
Hi,
I've seen some chatter on NFS boards about kqueue being more reliable
than inotify when used in NFSv3 and NFSv2. The chatter is a bit old so I
don't know if it is true anymore.
Anyone have pro/con experience with dovecot on the inotify/kqueue
question when using NFS storage?
I realize that kqueue is probably a bit slower and causes some delay
with IDLE. Also, it may not...
2018 May 03
0
@devel - Why no inotify?
Hey,
I thought about it a while back, haven't actually done it but I assume
using inotify on the brick should work, at least in replica volumes
(disperse probably wouldn't, you wouldn't get all events or you'd need
to make sure your inotify runs on every brick). Then from there you
could notify your clients, not ideal, but that should work.
I agree that adding support for i...