search for: inocc

...Legality: Further to the last couple of posts regarding legality issue. I notice that the PRC do their licence cost on a percentage of your revenue, seeing as I plan to host no adverts or indeed any commercial aspect I hope to get a licence without actually paying anything. (I've sent them an inoccous email so we'll see what they say) Relaying: Unless you get a business connection in the UK standard upload is generally 256Kbps regardless of your download rate (hence the Asynchronous bit in ADSL). I plan to use my brother's and parents internet connections at their respective houses a...

Hi, I was wondering if someone had any thoughts as to why "preexec" doesn't fire when "msdfs proxy" is used? Thank you, Greg Enlow -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 13 May 2015, at 11:18, Greg Enlow wrote: ok ok ... Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have duplicated all the current shares on the new server (NETAPP) as {share name}_ro and created equivalent shares on the SAMBA installation as DFS prox...

On 12/05/15 20:27, Greg Enlow wrote: > To the powers the might be, > > it seems that the "(root) preexec" function does not work when used with "msdfs proxy". Is that just "my" problem, an error or by design? > If it is by design, I would be curious to know why. > If it is an error, can it be addressed fairly quickly? > If it is none of the above,

...to the last couple of posts regarding legality issue. I notice > that the PRC do their licence cost on a percentage of your revenue, > seeing as I plan to host no adverts or indeed any commercial aspect I > hope to get a licence without actually paying anything. (I've sent > them an inoccous email so we'll see what they say) Do you mean PRS? I suspect there is a minimum fee - it'd be unlikely to get anything for free from these people. > Relaying: > Unless you get a business connection in the UK standard upload is > generally 256Kbps regardless of your download r...

...quot; doesn't fire > when "msdfs proxy" is used? > > Thank you, > Greg Enlow > > > -- > > Greg Enlow > grenlow at hk.mailbox.de > > > > On 13 May 2015, at 11:18, Greg Enlow wrote: > > ok ok ... > Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. > > This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing > read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have > duplicated all the current shares on the new server (NETAPP) as {share > name}_ro and created equivalent shares on the SAMBA...

ok ok ... Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have duplicated all the current shares on the new server (NETAPP) as {share name}_ro and created equivalent shares on the SAMBA installation as DFS prox...

...xy Hi, I was wondering if someone had any thoughts as to why "preexec" doesn't fire when "msdfs proxy" is used? Thank you, Greg Enlow -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 13 May 2015, at 11:18, Greg Enlow wrote: ok ok ... Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have duplicated all the current shares on the new server (NETAPP) as {share name}_ro and created equivalent shares on the SAMBA installation as DFS prox...

...t; >> Thank you, >> Greg Enlow >> >> >> -- >> >> Greg Enlow >> grenlow at hk.mailbox.de >> >> >> >> On 13 May 2015, at 11:18, Greg Enlow wrote: >> >> ok ok ... >> Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. >> >> This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing >> read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have >> duplicated all the current shares on the new server (NETAPP) as {share >> name}_ro and created equivalent...