search for: innards

Hi, i would like to find out more on how Rgui works. Is there any documentation that details how RGui interfaces with the R language & environment. So, i would like to know things such as: - What language is RGui built in (source available?) - What language is RTerm built in? - how does the output of an R command get directed to the terminal window in RGui? It seems to me that RGui is RTerm

For a few reasons: There is a missing bit of functionality that is important to me. I know WHAT I want to fox, but I do not know HOW. Also, if I am understanding how this module operates, I have ideas for other modules that use the same base methods. So, I am looking for either the folks that wrote this module or someone who can help me understand it enough for me to make some enhancements to

...data type to CLang and LLVM, but I am stumped on how to get TableGen to recognise this type. At the moment I am trying to optimise the calling convention code, and whenever I refer to 'v16f16' I get a crash in TableGen (unrecognised type). Unfortunately I haven't got my head around the innards of TableGen yet, so I am asking if anyone has any advice on how to add a new vector data type to TableGen? The main reason I need this is that OpenCL supports vectors with 16 elements for all supported scalar types, and the SHAVE processor does support FP16 (aka 'half') data types. Alt...

Quick question for those who know the innards of chan_sip: Does chan_sip use the "To:" header of an incoming INVITE request, for anything other than setting SIP_HEADER(TO) ? As far as I can tell so far, the target extension is taken from the request URI, i.e. sip:extension at domain, and the target context is taken from the section...

...em in /usr/share/applications and running update-desktop-database. But I can't seem to be able to create a new category. I found some probably related files in /usr/share/desktop-directories and tried to edit my custom medintux.directory file, but to no avail. Anyone here familiar with the innards of GNOME desktop menus? Cheers, Niki

>> The tomshardware-guys (no gals would do this...) have removed the >> fans, and immersed the innards of the computer in a sealed cabinet >> filled with cooking oil. So they have a completely silent machine >> in 40C warm oil. Amazing... It certainly is. And, I suppose, this will work, for a while, as long as: The "sealed cabinet", has enough expansion capacity for the...

...xruby 0.6 but I couldn''t live without some of those new funky features :) So, instead of writing my own code, I got a bit sidetracked and wrote http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=9297&group_id=35&atid=220 instead. Seeing as this is my first foray in to the innards of wxruby2, I eagerly await comments from the more seasoned wxrubyists. A.K.

I am trying to use Rails and an Oracle 7 database. I have the following error message: (eval):3:in `__send__'': ORA-12663: Services required by client not available on the server (OCIError) from (eval):3:in `describe'' and the line oracle_adapter,rb:361: (owner, table_name) = @connection.describe(table_name) Do I need this describe line? Can I replace with something else just

...gt; Is the expectation that to utilize this metadata an optimization pass would have to inspect the body of @f and reason about its behavior given <args>? Yes. > > If so, then I think this is pretty bad. If we ever want to parallelize function passes, then they can't inspect the innards of other functions. I must be missing something. Can't you do some simple locking? Lock a function if it's being transformed, or if you want to inspect it... > So this would significantly constrain the utility here. I think we can engineer around this problem. For example, the functi...

...clarifying question: Is the expectation that to utilize this metadata an optimization pass would have to inspect the body of @f and reason about its behavior given <args>? If so, then I think this is pretty bad. If we ever want to parallelize function passes, then they can't inspect the innards of other functions. So this would significantly constrain the utility here. Also, this would create uses of the arguments that were "ephemeral" uses. It's not clear how that is better than any of the other proposals to represent constraint systems in the IR via "ephemeral"...

...erify its output (or side effects) exactly, > to make sure I pin-pointed the issue. > > Sure, ok. But that is a public API, I'm specifically interested in cases > you need private API. > I'm not sure I understand what you mean. What I am saying is that I want to expose the innards of CodeExtractor.cpp in a header file, #include that in the unittest, and move the implementation out of an anonymous namespace into llvm::transforms::utils, or llvm::internal::transforms::utils, or similar, so it can be unit-tested. This is not about exposing the private API to end-users of LLVM...

After working professionally with Ruby on Rails for a year, I decided to write an article on my experiences with the framework. http://nathany.com/developer/rails-magic Since I detail a number of things that I found unintuitive or could be improved upon, I am posting a link here on the Rails Core in hopes to stimulate David Heinemeier Hansson and the core team towards an even better 3.0

...a book (or very small set of books) with the following properties?: - explains typical approaches of statistical analysis (like MASS, but not as condensed) - carefully describes preconditions, how to check them, robustness if they are violated, interpretation of results - avoids explaining the innards of the techniques (and generally uses the perspective of the computer age) - uses terminology that is easily mapped to R If yes, I would be very interested in seeing this list. I understand that one book cannot cover it all, but maybe there is at least something like "CAS-" (Conservat...

Hi, Here''s two blog posts for those that need to test respond_to blocks and/or are currently using simply_helpful extensively. http://blog.methodmissing.com/2006/11/22/testing-different-content- types-with-rspec http://blog.methodmissing.com/2006/11/23/using-simply_helpful-with- rspec-controller-tests - Lourens

Hi Evan, Could you maybe point me to the source files where this issue might originate? I'd like to learn more about LLVM's innards but so far I've just scraped the surface and I don't know where what phase of instruction selection / register allocation / stack layout / etc. happens. If I understand correctly this issue might be fixed by moving stack pointer alignment before register allocation? Is this something th...

...There are a lot of people out there writing front ends for other programming languages than C and C++ using LLVM (as I'm sure everyone is well aware). I'm writing one myself right now as part of my research. People working on front ends typically don't really know everything about the innards of LLVM, and thanks to LLVM's very nicely designed architecture, we don't need to, we mostly need to know how to generate IR and hook up to the rest of the system. We're more like users than developers of LLVM itself, and yet our questions tend to be quite technical since much of the AP...

I''m new to Ruby, Rails, and this list. I''ve tried searching for an answer but it all seems to be over my head. I have all the books but again they seem to leave me on my own to figure out the stuff that really matters. Where is the best place to find out the details? Exactly what are these much celebrated "naming conventions"; i.e. where do I find an exhaustive

Hello, I have today released an initial version of extended attributes and access control lists for ext3 (patch against the 2.4.13-ac3 kernel). Eric Jarman <ejarman@acm.org> has contributed a lot to this effort. Since I'm not very much into the innards of ext3, can some of you please take a look at the patch, and see whether it contains any flaws (and tell me which flaws)? Thanks! The patch can be found at <http://acl.bestbits.at/>. Please direct discussions about EA/ACL stuff to me personally, and to acl-devel@bestbits.at. Acl-devel is a...

...utilize this metadata an optimization pass > would have to inspect the body of @f and reason about its behavior given > <args>? > > > Yes. > > > If so, then I think this is pretty bad. If we ever want to parallelize > function passes, then they can't inspect the innards of other functions. > > > I must be missing something. Can't you do some simple locking? Lock a > function if it's being transformed, or if you want to inspect it... > I really, *really* don't like this. I do *not* want parallelizing LLVM to require careful locking pro...

...ion pass > would have to inspect the body of @f and reason about its behavior > given <args>? > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > If so, then I think this is pretty bad. If we ever want to > parallelize function passes, then they can't inspect the innards of > other functions. > > > I must be missing something. Can't you do some simple locking? Lock a > function if it's being transformed, or if you want to inspect it... > I think we'd exclude these functions from being acted upon by the regular optimization passes....