Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "inloop".
Did you mean:
infloop
2017 Jun 13
2
RFC: Dynamic dominators
...2, 3}, R{entry_n_1}, P{entry_n_1}
> [2] %n_3 IO{4, 5}, R{entry_n_1}, P{entry_n_1}
> =============================--------------------------------
> Inorder Dominator Tree:
> [1] %entry_n_1 {0,5}
> [2] %n_2 {1,2}
> [2] %n_3 {3,4}
>
> It seems the names "inloop" and "next" are not used.
>
> > Do you think that having a format like that in
> > LLVM would make sense? Danny and I though about in the context of quickly
> > writing and modifying tests for dominators and things like the NewGVN.
>
> For from-scratch do...