search for: inlight

...ly, Do you mean the "llvm-gcc -S file.c" , or can i have the same effect with C++ code (API) ? > but it's extremely difficult to get back to LLVM IR. Please, its vary important for me that you elaborate why it will be extremely difficult ( i can imagine it would hard, but if you inlight me i would probably create a better design...)? > If it's > something higher-level, it might not be so bad. Do you mean, higher than IR ? like c or C++ code ... > > > > So, this is what i think - > > I will add a Basic Block Pass to the LLVM, the code of the pass wi...

...fect with > C++ code (API) ? Everything in LLVM is accessible through the C++ APIs. >> but it's extremely difficult to get back to LLVM IR. > > Please, its vary important for me that you elaborate why it will > be extremely difficult ( i can imagine it would hard, but if you inlight me > i would probably create a better design...)? A lot of information gets lost when converting to assembly, like types, switches, the SSA form, etc. It's not impossible, especially if you make some assumptions about the compiler, but it's difficult enough that I wouldn't suggest...

...gt; > Everything in LLVM is accessible through the C++ APIs. > > >> but it's extremely difficult to get back to LLVM IR. > > > > Please, its vary important for me that you elaborate why it will > > be extremely difficult ( i can imagine it would hard, but if you inlight > me > > i would probably create a better design...)? > > A lot of information gets lost when converting to assembly, like > types, switches, the SSA form, etc. It's not impossible, especially > if you make some assumptions about the compiler, but it's difficult > e...

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > I need to add a new optimization to the LLVM compiler. Knowing what the optimization does would be very helpful here. > The optimization ALREADY written for x86 IR (i mean that the code that > handles the optimization is designated to work on assembly 86) . It's designed to work on x86 assembly, or

Hi, I am a student (software engineering), and i am using the LLVM in my project (I am sorry of the lack of details, but i want to take the minimum of your time, if you want more details don't hesitate...). I need to add a new optimization to the LLVM compiler. The optimization ALREADY written for x86 IR (i mean that the code that handles the optimization is designated to work on assembly 86)

Could someone please comment on the current state of chan_capi, chan_misdn and chan_modem channel drivers in terms of functionality and stability. Specifically, which channel driver would be best for a passive PCI HFC or W6692 ISDN card. The chan_misdn wiki claims that chan_capi distinguishes between junghanns and non-junghans cards, and that chan_misdn is better suited for general misdn