search for: initlally

Well, I have had to tweak this it a little, bit it finally worked fine. Initlally, the arial.ttf could not be found, so that I had to force the use of courier regular I'm using the standard default Treeflower theme. The following does toe job: cd /usr/share/gdm/themes/TreeFlower/background.png \ /usr/share/gdm/themes/TreeFlower/background-original.png gedit /etc/gdm/Init/D...

Hi I am having some problems running a covariate analysis with my colleage using R with the NonMem program we are using for a graduate school project. R and NonMem run fine without adding in the covariates, but the program is giving us a problem when the covariate analysis is added. We think the problem is with the R code to run the covariate data analysis. We have the control stream, R code

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:06:26AM +0000, Justin He wrote: > Hi Stefano > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> > > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 4:26 PM > > To: Justin He <Justin.He at arm.com> > > Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com>; Michael S. Tsirkin > > <mst at

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:06:26AM +0000, Justin He wrote: > Hi Stefano > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> > > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 4:26 PM > > To: Justin He <Justin.He at arm.com> > > Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com>; Michael S. Tsirkin > > <mst at

Hi Jia, thanks for the patch, some comments below: On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:13:14AM +0800, Jia He wrote: > Ning Bo reported an abnormal 2-second gap when booting Kata container [1]. > The unconditional timeout is caused by VSOCK_DEFAULT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT of > connect at client side. The vhost vsock client tries to connect an > initlizing virtio vsock server. > > The abnormal

On 7/16/13 5:23 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: > Thanks for the proposal. This is important work which is one step towards making LTO more applicable for large applications. Some comments inline. > > On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> 3.1.1 Figure out Partition scheme >> ---------------------------------- >> we

Thanks for the proposal. This is important work which is one step towards making LTO more applicable for large applications. Some comments inline. On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > > > 3.1.1 Figure out Partition scheme > ---------------------------------- > we randomly pick up some function and put them in a partition. > It

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 06:25:21PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:06:26AM +0000, Justin He wrote: > > Hi Stefano > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 4:26 PM > > > To: Justin He <Justin.He at arm.com> > >

On Jul 16, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 7/16/13 5:23 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: >> Thanks for the proposal. This is important work which is one step towards making LTO more applicable for large applications. Some comments inline. >> >> On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: >>

Hi, There: This is the proposal for parallelizing post-ipo stage. See the following for details. I also attach a toy-grade rudimentary implementation. This implementation can be used to illustrate some concepts here. This patch is not going to be committed. Unfortunately, this weekend I will be too busy to read emails. Please do not construe delayed response as being rude :-).

On 12 July 2013 15:49, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, There: > > This is the proposal for parallelizing post-ipo stage. See the following > for details. > > I also attach a toy-grade rudimentary implementation. This > implementation can be > used to illustrate some concepts here. This patch is not going to be > committed. > >

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]