search for: inititally

Hi, I am trying to avid the somewhat costly startup overhead of launching a separate R executable for each "client" request on Linux. My current architecture is such that My Java client explicitly calls R in batch mode and passes it certain parameters. The initital startup takes almost 10 seconds because R has to load a bunch of libraries as well as a moderately large, previously

..., the harder it seems. I am trying to come up with a way to work out the minimum distance between line segments. For instance, consider 20 random line segments: x1 <- runif(20) y1 <- runif(20) x2 <- runif(20) y2 <- runif(20) plot(x1, y1, type = "n") segments(x1, y1, x2, y2) Inititally I thought the solution to this problem was to work out the distance between midpoints (it quickly became apparent that this is totally wrong when looking at the plot). So, I thought that perhaps finding the minimum distance between each of the lines endpoints AND their midpoints would be a good pro...

...<- rep(0,27) Omega <- diag(0,27) p1 <- pmst(x, xi, Omega, alpha, df = 5) I get the following result: >p1 [1] 0 attr(,"error") [1] 1 attr(,"status") [1] "oversize" So it seems like the dimension is a problem here (and not the syntax or type mismatch, as I inititally thought - the function is evaluated) - although I found no warning about it in the help page. Can anyone give me a hint as to how to work around this problem and evaluate the skew-t cdf in a large-dimensional space? It's pretty crucial to my current research. Thanks in advance, Konrad [[alt...

Hello ! I 'm trying T.38 faxig with spandsp using rxfax/txfax as fax terminal. As another endpoint I 'm using Grandstream HT 486 ATA and a fax machine. Has anybody success with the HT486 as T.38 terminal ? ATA as originator: I managed only onetimes a successfull T.38 fax session. The other times the HT486 did not initiate a re-invite with T.38 parameters. Or shall the Terminator

...9;'m typing and autocomplete with tab key the command cd /remotepool/us (for /remotepool/users) I get a panic. check the panic @ http://www.boeri.be/panic.jpg -> autocomplete tab does a ls command in the background, I think I think there is a problem with NFSv4 acl/id mapping. Normal zfs (inititally created on the FreeBSD box) file systems are working fine. The nexenta box is Active Directory integrated with and the mappings for the users on this cifs share have been created on the fly (Ephemeral ID Mapping). Any solution for this? I really need the ACL permissions to be replicated. So rsy...

I''m having trouble getting autotest to run "out of the box" with rspec. I''ve got a Leopard setup with Zentest 3.5.0, rspec on trunk, and rails 2.0PR. No ".autotest" file. There are a couple of issues: 1. Running ''autotest'' inititally yields a command not found for "spec --diff unified etc etc". This seems to be an old issue but I can fix it by creating a "~/.autotest" file and attaching a hook to autotest initialize to explicity set the spec_command to script/spec. Fine. 2. Regardless of #1, restarting a...

Have a question about implementing Call Rollover with my current extensions.conf configuration. [macro-stdexten] exten => s,1,Dial(${ARG2},20) ; Ring the interface, 20 seconds maximum exten => s,2,Voicemail2(u${ARG1}) ; If unavailable, send to voicemail w/ unavail announce exten => s,3,Goto(default,s,1) ; If they press #, return to start exten =>

...------- > > (not including resizable memory regions on the QEMU side yet, so don't > focus on that part - it will consume a lot of memory right now for e.g. > dirty bitmaps and memory slot tracking data) > > Start QEMU with two virtio-mem devices that provide little memory inititally. > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -m 4G,maxmem=504G \ > -smp sockets=2,cores=2 \ > [...] > -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=256G \ > -device virtio-mem-pci,id=vm0,memdev=mem0,node=0,size=4160M \ > -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=256G \ > -device virtio-mem-pci...

Quoting "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml at o-sinc.com>: > You are not alone! > > On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 01:15:34 PM Remko Lodder wrote: >> Dear list, >> >> I have setup a master-master replication setup. My primairy MX's send >> email >> over on a DNS loadbalanced way, so DNS is doing some kind of round-robin >> way of sending

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:07 AM, mbraun via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Not going into all the detail, but from my side the big question is > whether the benchmarks inner loop is small/fine grained enough that > stabilization with google benchmark doesn't lead to dozens of seconds > benchmark runtimes. Given that you typically see thousandsd or millions

I still have echo during the first 15 seconds (or so) of each call, and the exact same thing is happening with either of two X100P in the same 2.2ghz system. asterisk# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 198457690 XT-PIC timer 1: 60 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 3: 0 XT-PIC usb-uhci 8: 1

It seems like when I use PPPD-command, or ZapRAS, Asterisk doesn't make it a "data" call, but a regular voice-call. My ISP change their behaivour depending on the incoming call-type (data or voice). If it's voice, they try to open up a V.90 connection. Else (data call) it will reply with PPP directly. The both methods uses the same modem pool number. How can I tell Asterisk

I'm having problems getting my aastra 480i to register with the asterisk server. I can inititate calls from the phone, but >sip show peers does not show any IP address registered for this phone. I am probably missing something stupidly simple. Anyone have an example config to share or corrections for my configuration? Asterisk 1.2 aastra 480i CT has the 1.4 firmware <sip.conf>

is there any possibility to do this on cent os for example company one will be in the block of 10.0.0.0.1-10.0.0.255 and routed to the one of my external ip company two will be in the block of 11.0.0.0.1-11.0.0.255 and routed to the one of my external ip i just need an advice is this better on windows vpn or llinux vpn server do you advice me any server software like open vpn or sth. else thank

What is different about the initial startup of iptables than 'service iptables restart' (and different from C5)? I want to use iptables port redirection to send port 80 to 8080 so a java web service doesn't have to start as root. On C5 it worked to give the iptables commmands, then 'iptables save', and from then on it would automatically work when iptables started after a

Hi all, I'm using Asterisk 1.0.9-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC8o on box A with a TE410P (EuroISDN cpe) connected to another similar asterisk box B acting as EuroISDN master. I'm performing some load tests by contiously feeding up to concurrent 30 call files to /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/ on box A which inititate via a dialplan context/extension a outbound call (redirected via chan_local) to

Not going into all the detail, but from my side the big question is whether the benchmarks inner loop is small/fine grained enough that stabilization with google benchmark doesn't lead to dozens of seconds benchmark runtimes. Given that you typically see thousandsd or millions of invocations for small functions... > On May 29, 2018, at 2:06 PM, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at

On 09/05/2017 02:07 PM, Serkan ?oban wrote: > For rpm packages you can use [1], just installed without any problems. > It is taking time packages to land in Centos storage SIG repo... Thank you for reporting this. The SIG does take a while to get updated with the latest bits. We are looking at ways to improve that in the future. > > [1]

Hi All, I have been trying to get the Solaris version of the G729 codec to work with asterisk 1.2.17 and 1.2.22. However, I come up against the very same error every time I try to install it. Has anyone out there seen this error, taken from the asterisk console straight from startup: [codec_g729a.so] => (Annex A/B (floating point) G.729 Codec (optimized for i386)) Jul 19 14:11:23

Hey folks, I guess this is an odd question to be asking here, but I could do with some feedback from anybody who''s actually using ZFS in anger. I''m about to go live with ZFS in our company on a new fileserver, but I have some real concerns about whether I can really trust ZFS to keep my data alive if things go wrong. This is a big step for us, we''re a 100% windows