search for: initiate_wins_processing

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "initiate_wins_processing".

2007 Feb 04
0
SAMBA bug??
...1/07 04:04:17, 0] lib/util.c:log_stack_trace(1721) BACKTRACE: 9 stack frames: #0 nmbd(log_stack_trace+0x1c) [0x5555555f88bc] #1 nmbd(smb_panic+0x43) [0x5555555f89a3] #2 nmbd [0x5555555e6d72] #3 /lib64/libc.so.6 [0x2aaaac485210] #4 nmbd(tdb_traverse+0x17) [0x55555560d567] #5 nmbd(initiate_wins_processing+0x5f) [0x55555559711f] #6 nmbd(main+0x7ff) [0x555555581bbf] #7 /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x2aaaac472a44] #8 nmbd [0x555555580219] [2007/01/07 04:04:18, 0] lib/fault.c:dump_core(173) dumping core in /var/log/samba/cores/nmbd [2007/01/07 06:22:37, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(700)...
1998 Sep 09
1
WINS problem discovered and fixed!! browsing speedup of 20X for large networks
...d code segment. To explain we have a large number of clients ~1000+ at any one time over 6 subnets. Browsing was spuratic at best. nmbd sucked up %70 of the proccessing power of a sparc 5. Well after serious investigation I traced it down to two lines of code in nmbd_winsserver.c. in function initiate_wins_processing ... if(wins_server_subnet->namelist_changed) wins_write_database(); ... My first hack worked. I commented them out. Processing time went down to >1% and responce time probably went up by at least 20X. Browsing works better than I have ever expected. Before I did this I had tried eve...