search for: initializecor

...::create(&nM); typedef int (*REFunc)(const char *); union { void * obj; REFunc func; } u; u.obj = EJ->getPointerToFunction(func); REFunc jit = u.func; int ret = jit("aaa"); std::cout << std::endl << ret << std::endl; // This code interprets the function llvm::initializeCore(); llvm::ExecutionEngine * EI = llvm::EngineBuilder(&M).setEngineKind(llvm::EngineKind::Interpreter).create(); EI->runStaticConstructorsDestructors(false); std::vector<llvm::GenericValue> args; llvm::GenericValue arg1((void*)"aaabc"); args.push_back(arg1); llvm::APInt res...

...t;> union { void * obj; REFunc func; } u; >> u.obj = EJ->getPointerToFunction(func); >> REFunc jit = u.func; >> int ret = jit("aaa"); >> std::cout << std::endl << ret << std::endl; >> // This code interprets the function >> llvm::initializeCore(); >> llvm::ExecutionEngine * EI  = >> llvm::EngineBuilder(&M).setEngineKind(llvm::EngineKind::Interpreter).create(); >> EI->runStaticConstructorsDestructors(false); >> std::vector<llvm::GenericValue> args; >> llvm::GenericValue arg1((void*)"aaabc&qu...

...mae/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:635: void llvm::PMTopLevelManager::schedulePass(llvm::Pass*): Assertion `PI && "Expected required passes to be initialized"' failed. The solution was to add: PassRegistry &Registry = *PassRegistry::getPassRegistry(); initializeCore(Registry); initializeScalarOpts(Registry); initializeIPO(Registry); initializeAnalysis(Registry); initializeIPA(Registry); initializeTransformUtils(Registry); initializeInstCombine(Registry); initializeInstrumentation(Registry); initializeTarget(Registry); before creating passes....

...ory of the file, I have no idea how one would have concluded this whas a Windows thing. It first occurred in 1c5b428ff8234cef705bf57bc1418deb4db25c83 (SVN r23921) when Windows support was not yet a thing. LLVM tools themselves, like opt, call some function for each LLVM component directly (such as initializeCore()) to achieve the same thing. Howwer clang does include LinkAllPasses.h (in cc1_main.cpp). All that matters is that there is a strong reference to at least one symbol to each object file, otherwise the linker will not include it when. Michael

...InitializeAllTargets(); InitializeAllTargetMCs(); InitializeAllAsmPrinters(); InitializeAllAsmParsers(); // Initialize codegen and IR passes used by llc so that the -print-after, // -print-before, and -stop-after options work. PassRegistry *Registry = PassRegistry::getPassRegistry(); initializeCore(*Registry); initializeCodeGen(*Registry); initializeLoopStrengthReducePass(*Registry); initializeLowerIntrinsicsPass(*Registry); initializeUnreachableBlockElimPass(*Registry); -- Mehdi > On Mar 24, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Lorenzo Laneve <lore97drk at icloud.com> wrote: > > U...

Dear lazydev, I'm writing an instrumentation pass that depends on AliasAnalysis. My getAnalysisUsage() looks as follows: 2453 void ThreadSanitizer::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { 2454 AU.addRequired<TargetData>(); 2455 AU.addRequired<AliasAnalysis>(); 2456 } and the pass initialization: 2668 char ThreadSanitizer::ID = 0; 2669

...eAllTargetMCs(); > InitializeAllAsmPrinters(); > InitializeAllAsmParsers(); > > // Initialize codegen and IR passes used by llc so that the -print-after, > // -print-before, and -stop-after options work. > PassRegistry *Registry = PassRegistry::getPassRegistry(); > initializeCore(*Registry); > initializeCodeGen(*Registry); > initializeLoopStrengthReducePass(*Registry); > initializeLowerIntrinsicsPass(*Registry); > initializeUnreachableBlockElimPass(*Registry); > > > -- > Mehdi > > > >> On Mar 24, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Lorenzo...

...InitializeAllAsmPrinters(); >> InitializeAllAsmParsers(); >> >> // Initialize codegen and IR passes used by llc so that the -print-after, >> // -print-before, and -stop-after options work. >> PassRegistry *Registry = PassRegistry::getPassRegistry(); >> initializeCore(*Registry); >> initializeCodeGen(*Registry); >> initializeLoopStrengthReducePass(*Registry); >> initializeLowerIntrinsicsPass(*Registry); >> initializeUnreachableBlockElimPass(*Registry); >> >> >> -- >> Mehdi >> >> >> &...

Hi Michael On Tue Nov 10, 2020 at 1:29 AM GMT, Michael Kruse wrote: > Am Mo., 2. Nov. 2020 um 14:01 Uhr schrieb David Blaikie > <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > Hmm, not sure why the whole file was added only when MSVC support was added - if it is a "static library object file selection" issue. Wouldn't that have turned up on other platforms before that moment? >

...unc func; } u; > >> u.obj = EJ->getPointerToFunction(func); > >> REFunc jit = u.func; > >> int ret = jit("aaa"); > >> std::cout << std::endl << ret << std::endl; > >> // This code interprets the function > >> llvm::initializeCore(); > >> llvm::ExecutionEngine * EI = > >> > llvm::EngineBuilder(&M).setEngineKind(llvm::EngineKind::Interpreter).create(); > >> EI->runStaticConstructorsDestructors(false); > >> std::vector<llvm::GenericValue> args; > >> llvm::GenericVa...

...(); >>> InitializeAllAsmParsers(); >>> >>> // Initialize codegen and IR passes used by llc so that the -print-after, >>> // -print-before, and -stop-after options work. >>> PassRegistry *Registry = PassRegistry::getPassRegistry(); >>> initializeCore(*Registry); >>> initializeCodeGen(*Registry); >>> initializeLoopStrengthReducePass(*Registry); >>> initializeLowerIntrinsicsPass(*Registry); >>> initializeUnreachableBlockElimPass(*Registry); >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mehdi...

...nitializeAllAsmParsers(); >>>> >>>> // Initialize codegen and IR passes used by llc so that the -print-after, >>>> // -print-before, and -stop-after options work. >>>> PassRegistry *Registry = PassRegistry::getPassRegistry(); >>>> initializeCore(*Registry); >>>> initializeCodeGen(*Registry); >>>> initializeLoopStrengthReducePass(*Registry); >>>> initializeLowerIntrinsicsPass(*Registry); >>>> initializeUnreachableBlockElimPass(*Registry); >>>> >>>> >>&g...

That is as easy or hard to track like pass registration. All of that mostly happens when llvm starts up and the user calls all these functions like initializeCore(), intiaizlieCodeGen(), initializeAllTargets(), and all the other existing init functions. Also noticing missing init errors is obvious and fixing them trivial. - Matthias > On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > It is difficult to evaluate...

This is also happening when using the C++ APIs. It looks like an MCJIT and SetGC interaction. I'm lost on how to proceed further. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: > The erlang was a typo, I was trying things out. > > I've updated the bug with a C program, which exhibits the problem. > > To answer your question,

Update: Sorry my bad. I built llvm and tried it with debugging version. It was an assertion (IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:764) saying that it expects all immutable passes to be initialized. > On Mar 24, 2016, at 2:00 AM, Lorenzo Laneve <lore97drk at icloud.com> wrote: > > I’m using LLVM 3.8.0, and no, it’s the precompiled version > That’s why it doesn’t give me enough info for

Oh, right, this stuff. I guess the non-windows solution might've been a volatile read, for instance? So maybe not so much that the general machinery isn't needed, but that perhaps MSVC does something interesting with a volatile read or whatever other solution might've been used. Hmm, not sure why the whole file was added only when MSVC support was added - if it is a "static

As I wrote the trick here is sneak the initGlobals() into the places where we do pass registration which should get you a big part of the way. For the remaining cases you have to add a few functions and call them from init() like functions which we have all over llvm anyway because of pass registration. - Matthias > On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:46 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>

I’m using LLVM 3.8.0, and no, it’s the precompiled version That’s why it doesn’t give me enough info for debug > On 24 Mar 2016, at 1:53 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > This code path is not likely to crash usually. Did you build LLVM yourself? Which version are you using and can you reduce the test case to be "minimal" so that someone can

Patch for review. On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM Puyan Lotfi <puyan.lotfi.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Ping. > > Still working on preparing code for review. Will have a patch for review > ready in the coming days. > > PL > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:06 PM Puyan Lotfi <puyan.lotfi.llvm at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >>

...:basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)/n/fs/scratch/tpondich/ParallelAssert/llvm-objects/tools/opt/Debug+Asserts/opt.o vtable for llvm::IntervalPartition /n/fs/scratch/tpondich/ParallelAssert/llvm-objects/tools/opt/Debug+Asserts/opt.o llvm::initializeCore(llvm::PassRegistry&) /n/fs/scratch/tpondich/ParallelAssert/llvm-objects/tools/opt/Debug+Asserts/opt.o llvm::createPostDomTree() /n/fs/scratch/tpondich/ParallelAssert/llvm-objects/tools/opt/Debug+Asserts/opt.o llvm::FunctionPass::doInitialization(llvm::Module&) /n/fs/scratch/tpondich/Paral...