search for: initializeallpass

...er? For example, could you extend PassManager with a method that calls all of the passes's initialization methods? In other words, could you easily support something like: > > PassManager.add (Pass1); > PassManager.add (Pass2); > ... > PassManager.add (PassN); > PassManager.initializeAllPasses (); > PassManager.run(); > > > ... or could the PassManager::add() method automatically initialize the pass? Other possibilities may exists which are better as well; these are just the first two I've thought of. Neither of those will work. These initialization have nothing to...

...er? For example, could you extend PassManager with a method that calls all of the passes's initialization methods? In other words, could you easily support something like: > > PassManager.add (Pass1); > PassManager.add (Pass2); > ... > PassManager.add (PassN); > PassManager.initializeAllPasses (); > PassManager.run(); > > > ... or could the PassManager::add() method automatically initialize the pass? Other possibilities may exists which are better as well; these are just the first two I've thought of. Chris and I had a discussion about this offline, and he pointed...

On 10/8/10 3:44 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > [snip] > >> Hrm. I see. >> >> I still don't like the idea of having every statically-linked tool explicitly initializing every library that gets linked in. Just dumping the library into the Makefile and being done with it was much nicer. >> >> If you can find a reasonable way to support that, it would be nice.

...Could you devise something better? For example, could you extend PassManager with a method that calls all of the passes's initialization methods? In other words, could you easily support something like: PassManager.add (Pass1); PassManager.add (Pass2); ... PassManager.add (PassN); PassManager.initializeAllPasses (); PassManager.run(); ... or could the PassManager::add() method automatically initialize the pass? Other possibilities may exists which are better as well; these are just the first two I've thought of. -- John T. > > > * WHAT THIS MEANS FOR LLVM USERS > > Users of LLV...

On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:37 PM, John Criswell wrote: > On 10/8/10 3:15 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: >> >> On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:05 PM, John Criswell wrote: >> >>> On 10/8/10 1:29 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: >>>> Hello fellow LLVM-ers, >>>> >>>> As those of you who follow llvm-commits have probably noticed, I've been hard at work

...ger with a >> method that calls all of the passes's initialization methods? In >> other words, could you easily support something like: >> >> PassManager.add (Pass1); >> PassManager.add (Pass2); >> ... >> PassManager.add (PassN); >> PassManager.initializeAllPasses (); >> PassManager.run(); >> >> >> ... or could the PassManager::add() method automatically initialize >> the pass? Other possibilities may exists which are better as well; >> these are just the first two I've thought of. > > Neither of those will...