search for: init_gdt

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 39 matches for "init_gdt".

2007 Apr 28
3
[PATCH] i386: introduce voyager smp_ops, fix voyager build
...ic inline struct task_struct * alloc #define alloc_idle_task(cpu) fork_idle(cpu) #endif -/* Initialize the CPU's GDT. This is either the boot CPU doing itself - (still using the master per-cpu area), or a CPU doing it for a - secondary which will soon come up. */ -static __cpuinit void init_gdt(int cpu) -{ - struct desc_struct *gdt = get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu); - - pack_descriptor((u32 *)&gdt[GDT_ENTRY_PERCPU].a, - (u32 *)&gdt[GDT_ENTRY_PERCPU].b, - __per_cpu_offset[cpu], 0xFFFFF, - 0x80 | DESCTYPE_S | 0x2, 0x8); - - per_cpu(this_cpu_off, cpu) = __per_cpu_offset[cpu]; - per_cpu(...
2007 Apr 28
3
[PATCH] i386: introduce voyager smp_ops, fix voyager build
...ic inline struct task_struct * alloc #define alloc_idle_task(cpu) fork_idle(cpu) #endif -/* Initialize the CPU's GDT. This is either the boot CPU doing itself - (still using the master per-cpu area), or a CPU doing it for a - secondary which will soon come up. */ -static __cpuinit void init_gdt(int cpu) -{ - struct desc_struct *gdt = get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu); - - pack_descriptor((u32 *)&gdt[GDT_ENTRY_PERCPU].a, - (u32 *)&gdt[GDT_ENTRY_PERCPU].b, - __per_cpu_offset[cpu], 0xFFFFF, - 0x80 | DESCTYPE_S | 0x2, 0x8); - - per_cpu(this_cpu_off, cpu) = __per_cpu_offset[cpu]; - per_cpu(...
2007 Apr 27
3
The virtuailization patches break Voyager.
...g up on pending patches is to be expected, but it would be nice if things were restructured to make it harder to miss the subarchitectures on arch/i386. The patch known as x86_64-mm-use-per-cpu-gdt-immediately-upon-boot on -mm currently breaks voyager smp support in some very obvious ways. Making init_gdt a function which is called from voyager_smp.c static in smpboot.c a file that is not even used on voayger is an obvious one. Adding start_pda and not setting it in voyager_smp is another. Rusty do you think you can address this? Eric
2007 Apr 27
3
The virtuailization patches break Voyager.
...g up on pending patches is to be expected, but it would be nice if things were restructured to make it harder to miss the subarchitectures on arch/i386. The patch known as x86_64-mm-use-per-cpu-gdt-immediately-upon-boot on -mm currently breaks voyager smp support in some very obvious ways. Making init_gdt a function which is called from voyager_smp.c static in smpboot.c a file that is not even used on voayger is an obvious one. Adding start_pda and not setting it in voyager_smp is another. Rusty do you think you can address this? Eric
2007 Apr 18
5
[patch 0/5] i386-gdt-pda i386 gdt and pda updates
Hi Andrew, This patch series adds to the end of the existing i386-gdt-cleanups patches: allow-per-cpu-variables-to-be-page-aligned.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-variables-for-gdt-pda.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-gdt-immediately-upon-boot.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-gdt-immediately-upon-boot-fix.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-clean-up-cpu_init.patch
2007 Apr 18
5
[patch 0/5] i386-gdt-pda i386 gdt and pda updates
Hi Andrew, This patch series adds to the end of the existing i386-gdt-cleanups patches: allow-per-cpu-variables-to-be-page-aligned.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-variables-for-gdt-pda.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-gdt-immediately-upon-boot.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-gdt-immediately-upon-boot-fix.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-clean-up-cpu_init.patch
2007 Apr 18
8
[patch 0/6] i386 gdt and percpu cleanups
Hi Andi, This is a series of patches based on your latest queue (as of the other day, at least). It includes: - the most recent patch to compute the appropriate amount of percpu space to allocate, using a separate reservation for modules where needed. - make the percpu sections page-aligned, so that percpu variables can be page aligned if needed (which is used by gdt_page) -
2007 Apr 18
8
[patch 0/6] i386 gdt and percpu cleanups
Hi Andi, This is a series of patches based on your latest queue (as of the other day, at least). It includes: - the most recent patch to compute the appropriate amount of percpu space to allocate, using a separate reservation for modules where needed. - make the percpu sections page-aligned, so that percpu variables can be page aligned if needed (which is used by gdt_page) -
2007 Apr 18
31
[PATCH 00/28] Updates for firstfloor paravirt-ops patches
Hi Andi, This is a set of updates for the firstfloor patch queue. Quick rundown: revert-mm-x86_64-mm-account-for-module-percpu-space-separately-from-kernel-percpu.patch separate-module-percpu-space.patch Update the module percpu accounting patch fix-ff-allow-percpu-variables-to-be-page-aligned.patch Make sure the percpu memory allocation is page-aligned
2007 Apr 18
31
[PATCH 00/28] Updates for firstfloor paravirt-ops patches
Hi Andi, This is a set of updates for the firstfloor patch queue. Quick rundown: revert-mm-x86_64-mm-account-for-module-percpu-space-separately-from-kernel-percpu.patch separate-module-percpu-space.patch Update the module percpu accounting patch fix-ff-allow-percpu-variables-to-be-page-aligned.patch Make sure the percpu memory allocation is page-aligned
2007 Apr 18
3
Per-cpu patches on top of PDA stuff...
Hi Jeremy, all, Sorry this took so long, spent last week in Japan at OSDL conf then netconf. After several false starts, I ended up with a very simple implementation, which clashes significantly with your work since then 8(. I've pushed the patches anyway, but it's going to be significant work for me to re-merge them, so I wanted your feedback first. The first patch simply changes
2007 Apr 18
3
Per-cpu patches on top of PDA stuff...
Hi Jeremy, all, Sorry this took so long, spent last week in Japan at OSDL conf then netconf. After several false starts, I ended up with a very simple implementation, which clashes significantly with your work since then 8(. I've pushed the patches anyway, but it's going to be significant work for me to re-merge them, so I wanted your feedback first. The first patch simply changes
2007 Apr 23
27
[PATCH 00/25] xen: Xen implementation for paravirt_ops
Hi Andi, This series of patches implements the Xen paravirt-ops interface. It applies to 2.6.21-rc7 + your patches + the last batch of pv_ops patches I posted. This patch generally restricts itself to Xen-specific parts of the tree, though it does make a few small changes elsewhere. These patches include: - some helper routines for allocating address space and walking pagetables - Xen
2007 Apr 23
27
[PATCH 00/25] xen: Xen implementation for paravirt_ops
Hi Andi, This series of patches implements the Xen paravirt-ops interface. It applies to 2.6.21-rc7 + your patches + the last batch of pv_ops patches I posted. This patch generally restricts itself to Xen-specific parts of the tree, though it does make a few small changes elsewhere. These patches include: - some helper routines for allocating address space and walking pagetables - Xen
2007 Apr 18
34
[patch 00/34] Xen-pv_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP and SMP guest support (NEW!) * dynamic ticks (NEW!) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes (non-PAE may be broken at the moment) * xen hvc console
2007 Apr 18
34
[patch 00/34] Xen-pv_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP and SMP guest support (NEW!) * dynamic ticks (NEW!) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes (non-PAE may be broken at the moment) * xen hvc console
2007 Apr 18
34
[patch 00/34] Xen-pv_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP and SMP guest support (NEW!) * dynamic ticks (NEW!) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes (non-PAE may be broken at the moment) * xen hvc console
2007 Apr 18
20
[patch 00/20] XEN-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block
2007 Apr 18
20
[patch 00/20] XEN-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block
2007 Apr 18
20
[patch 00/20] XEN-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block