Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "inicidentally".
Did you mean:
incidentally
2013 Jun 28
0
[LLVMdev] [LNT] Question about results reliability in LNT infrustructure
On 28 June 2013 10:28, David Tweed <david.tweed at arm.com> wrote:
> (Inicidentally, responding to the earlier email below, I think you don't
> really want to compare moving averages but use some statistical test to
> quantify if the separation between the set of points within the "earlier
> window" are statistically significantly higher than the "later...
2013 Jun 27
7
[LLVMdev] [LNT] Question about results reliability in LNT infrustructure
There are a few things we have looked at with LNT runs, so I will share the insights we have had so far. A lot of the problems we have are artificially created by our test protocols instead of the compiler changes themselves. I have been doing a lot of large sample runs of single benchmarks to characterize them better. Some key points:
1) Some benchmarks are bi-modal or multi-modal, single
2013 Jun 27
0
[LLVMdev] [LNT] Question about results reliability in LNT infrustructure
Just forwarding this to the list, my original reply was bounced.
On Jun 27, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote:
> There are a few things we have looked at with LNT runs, so I will share the insights we have had so far. A lot of the problems we have are artificially created by our test protocols instead of the compiler changes themselves. I have been