search for: ingnored

On 20.10.2018 7.29, Phil wrote: > The 'noreplicate' user database field described in the wiki appears to > make no difference as to whether an account gets replicated or not. > My sql user query returns a 'noreplicate' field and I can confirm that > this is getting set using 'doveadm user', however when I add a new > account with noreplicate=true it gets

The 'noreplicate' user database field described in the wiki appears to make no difference as to whether an account gets replicated or not. My sql user query returns a 'noreplicate' field and I can confirm that this is getting set using 'doveadm user', however when I add a new account with noreplicate=true it gets replicated regardless. User query: user_query = SELECT

Hi Sometimes (and I haven't yet found out what causes it) I get a message: Warning: ingnored non-function "t" I think it may be either when I have done a Ctl-C to break in or I may have inadvertently named a variable after one of the many system or other functions. I have seen names other than "t". Anyway, the only way I can get rid of it is to exit and restart. I d...

I am trying to write a function that will run a linear model and plot the regression coeficients with their corresponding means. I am having two problems. I can get the plot with the function below, but I am having trouble labeling the points. function(y,x1,x2,x3,x4){ outlm<-lm(y~x1+x2+x3+x4) imp<-as.data.frame(outlm$coef[-1]) meanvec<-c(mean(x1),mean(x2),mean(x3),mean(x4))

>So in my sip.conf I put many variations of what I thought should go in >there, >finally including (to no avail): I have had to play this guessing game as well with other codecs/config file settings in general. And I think this email touches on something that has been troubling me for sometime. >You should allow "g726" only. I think one problem area of documentation

...m from redhat I then treid to apply the patches: cat ../ext3-0.0.6b/linux-2.2.19pre14.kdb.diff | patch -sp1 cat ../ext3-0.0.6b/linux-2.2.19pre14.ext3.diff | patch -sp1 But got prompted for which file to patch and not knowing what to do I returned through them and got nastygrams about hunks being ingnored. This I can see since I did not tell it what to do. Can I apply these patched to the redhat source and if so what do I need to do? I just subscribed to this list and have not recieved a message yet so I hope you guys are out there. This output is a little different since I tried again from clean...

Your message doesn't help us very much. You haven't said what kind of calculation it is you want to do, and that certainly matters. For example, for some kinds of computations the solution you started below would work fine: > M <- matrix(1:16, 4, 4) > is.na(diag(M)) <- TRUE > M [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [1,] NA 5 9 13 [2,] 2 NA 10 14 [3,] 3 7 NA

I'm receiving compiler warning messages using Solaris 2.8, Sun Workshop 6 C compiler and Samba 2.2.4. Can the warning be safely ingnored? Dennis 36 % make Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -I/usr/openwin/share/include/X11/extensions -I/usr/openwin/include= -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DLOGFILEBASE="/usr/local/samba.22/var" -DCONFIGFILE="/usr/local/samba.22/l...

I have added regular expression support using a POSIX implementation. The patch (against 2.5.5) is attached. The implementation is simple and follows the same mechanism that is implemented for normal searches. I added these command line arguments: --rexclude=PATTERN exclude files matching regexp PATTERN --rexclude-from=FILE exclude regexp patterns listed in FILE --rinclude=PATTERN