search for: ingnor

On 20.10.2018 7.29, Phil wrote: > The 'noreplicate' user database field described in the wiki appears to > make no difference as to whether an account gets replicated or not. > My sql user query returns a 'noreplicate' field and I can confirm that > this is getting set using 'doveadm user', however when I add a new > account with noreplicate=true it gets

The 'noreplicate' user database field described in the wiki appears to make no difference as to whether an account gets replicated or not. My sql user query returns a 'noreplicate' field and I can confirm that this is getting set using 'doveadm user', however when I add a new account with noreplicate=true it gets replicated regardless. User query: user_query = SELECT

Hi Sometimes (and I haven't yet found out what causes it) I get a message: Warning: ingnored non-function "t" I think it may be either when I have done a Ctl-C to break in or I may have inadvertently named a variable after one of the many system or other functions. I have seen names other than "t". Anyway, the only way I can get rid of it is to exit and restart. I...

...utlm$coef[-1]) meanvec<-c(mean(x1),mean(x2),mean(x3),mean(x4)) out<-list(imp,meanvec) mf<-as.data.frame(out) plot((mf),xlab="Impact",ylab="performance") abline(h=mean(meanvec)) abline(v=mean(imp)) } Problem #2: If I only input x1,x2,and x3 how do I get the function to ingnore the 4th instead of giving me the unused argument error? Thanks Derek

...ou should allow "g726" only. I think one problem area of documentation for asterisk (is it getting warm in here, cause i feel some flames coming on :-) is a good resource for valid entries in the various config files. It would be nice to know EXACTLY what you can put in these files ( ingnoring obligatory "stupid newbie should read the source" comment here ) . The wiki is a good resource for most of this, and all in all, i'd say that you can get the job done by tracking these things down yourself, trying various ones you come across, and weeding out the bogus entries...

...m from redhat I then treid to apply the patches: cat ../ext3-0.0.6b/linux-2.2.19pre14.kdb.diff | patch -sp1 cat ../ext3-0.0.6b/linux-2.2.19pre14.ext3.diff | patch -sp1 But got prompted for which file to patch and not knowing what to do I returned through them and got nastygrams about hunks being ingnored. This I can see since I did not tell it what to do. Can I apply these patched to the redhat source and if so what do I need to do? I just subscribed to this list and have not recieved a message yet so I hope you guys are out there. This output is a little different since I tried again from cle...

Your message doesn't help us very much. You haven't said what kind of calculation it is you want to do, and that certainly matters. For example, for some kinds of computations the solution you started below would work fine: > M <- matrix(1:16, 4, 4) > is.na(diag(M)) <- TRUE > M [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [1,] NA 5 9 13 [2,] 2 NA 10 14 [3,] 3 7 NA

I'm receiving compiler warning messages using Solaris 2.8, Sun Workshop 6 C compiler and Samba 2.2.4. Can the warning be safely ingnored? Dennis 36 % make Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -I/usr/openwin/share/include/X11/extensions -I/usr/openwin/include= -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DLOGFILEBASE="/usr/local/samba.22/var" -DCONFIGFILE="/usr/local/samba.22...

...ern starts with a '/' and ends with a '/' with some operators +(e or i) at the end, then the pattern is extracted from between the +slashes '/'\&. eg. "/.*\\.exe/i"\&. The operators are as follows: +.br +e <-- Extended regular expression +.br +i <-- Ingnore case +.IP +.IP o +if the pattern starts with "+R " (a plus followed by an 'R' followed by +a space) then it is always considered a regular expression include +pattern, even if specified as part of an include or exclude option\&. +The "+R " part is discarded before...