Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ingeniosly".
2009 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] PassManager again...
...- If that's
> not the case then find out why? This may be a bug.
> 2) Someone is not preserving this pass. If that's the case then who is
> it? Is it explicitly claiming to preserve your pass ?
Okay, got it, did cost me 4 days of debugging tough.
Why so long? PassManager is quite ingeniosly crafted, making it hard to
debug. Thats why there is massive CLI-Support for debugging passes
(think "-debug-pass=Details"). Problem is that the debug output does not
show _all_ the passes that are invalidated but some _only some_ of them.
Since _some_ invalidated passes are show, I ne...
2009 Nov 20
2
[LLVMdev] PassManager again...
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Andreas Neustifter
<astifter-llvm at gmx.at> wrote:
>
> If I use AU.addRequired<ProfileInfo>() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp the
> wrong ProfileInfo is used. It uses the "No ProfileInfo" implementation
> if ProfileInfo but not the one from ProfileInfoLoaderPass. (Which is
> immediately discarded after creation.)
>
You need to