search for: infoxx

...um_entries," which without looking into it might have been equivalent to "count." It would seem to me that "totalentries" really has to be bounds checked here else you can fall into this trap. I know this is ugly, but couldn't something be done like offsetof(ctr.share.infoXX, count) to verify that that the array size and total entries match. Or perhaps even better check this bounds condition during the NDR pull out unmarshalling code? (that is what I would vote for since it puts less of a burden on the callee but there may be cases where knowing the total entries vs wh...