search for: infot

...post about TNTC is beyond the time I have right now. Sure, understandable. I'm surprised someone else hasn't already :) > Here is some high level documentation of the layout of Heap objects in GHC: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Rts/Storage/HeapObjects#InfoTables > > With TNTC enabled we generate code for closures of this form: > > .text > .align 8 > .long Main_main1_srt-(Main_main1_info)+0 > .long 0 > .quad 4294967299 > .quad 0 > .quad 270582939663 > .globl Main_main1_info > .type Main_main1_info, @object &g...

...the time I have right now. > > Sure, understandable. I'm surprised someone else hasn't already :) > >> Here is some high level documentation of the layout of Heap objects in GHC: >> >> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Rts/Storage/HeapObjects#InfoTables >> >> With TNTC enabled we generate code for closures of this form: >> >> .text >> .align 8 >> .long Main_main1_srt-(Main_main1_info)+0 >> .long 0 >> .quad 4294967299 >> .quad 0 >> .quad 270582939663 >> .globl Main_main1...

Hmm writing a blog post about TNTC is beyond the time I have right now. Here is some high level documentation of the layout of Heap objects in GHC: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Rts/Storage/HeapObjects#InfoTables With TNTC enabled we generate code for closures of this form: .text .align 8 .long Main_main1_srt-(Main_main1_info)+0 .long 0 .quad 4294967299 .quad 0 .quad 270582939663 .globl Main_main1_info .type Main_main1_info, @object Main_main1_info: .Lc1Df: leaq -8(%rbp),%rax cmpq %r15,%rax...

...nd the time I have right now. > > Sure, understandable. I'm surprised someone else hasn't already :) > >> Here is some high level documentation of the layout of Heap objects in GHC: >> >> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Rts/Storage/HeapObjects#InfoTables >> >> With TNTC enabled we generate code for closures of this form: >> >> .text >> .align 8 >> .long Main_main1_srt-(Main_main1_info)+0 >> .long 0 >> .quad 4294967299 >> .quad 0 >> .quad 2705829...

Hi, I am going to be attempting a build of R for the alphas (our main need is to collate and present graphically, performance metrics we gather on our applications). We have: CC=cc, CXX=cxx, Fortran V5.51 (f77, f95), GNU make 3.80, Perl 5.8.4 I am hesitant to rebuild GCC on this platform, and would like to know if others have success in building R with native C, C++ and Fortran. I plan on

R Listers, One of the list contributors suggested I abandon attempts to build R-1.9.1 and focus on building R-2.3.1. I believe the main set of packages have been built properly (with some changes to the code) - however, when building the Recommended packages, the build fails. CODE CHANGES: ============= 1. My C compiler requires a ";" on line 589 of ..../src/main/printutils.c. Here

On Feb 13, 2012, at 6:49 AM, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On behalf of GHC hackers, I would like to discuss the possibility of > having a proper implementation of the tables-next-to-code optimisation > in LLVM. It would be great to have this. However, the design will be tricky. Is there anything that spells out how the TNTC optimization works at the actual machine instruction level? It

Hello everyone, On behalf of GHC hackers, I would like to discuss the possibility of having a proper implementation of the tables-next-to-code optimisation in LLVM. Currently, the object code produced by all three GHC backends follows the convention that the table with the metadata of a closure is located immediately before the code of the closure. This makes it possible to get to both the code