Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "informaction".
Did you mean:
informacion
2014 Dec 03
3
partedmagic connecting to a comcast address
John,
thank you for replying.
On 12/03/2014 03:21 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/3/2014 12:47 PM, g wrote:
>> wireshark text file loaded at;
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/rCU0CC10
>
> some device on your network has the MAC address 00:0f:fe:8f:8f:23
> which Wireshark is calling PartedMagic for unknown reasons.
see my new paste at;
http://pastebin.com/8vBxnUSf
2015 Jun 13
4
C5 : Firefox 38 bug
On 06/12/2015 11:25 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> jd1008 wrote:
>> On 06/12/2015 07:28 AM, g wrote:
>>> On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>>>> I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP,
>>>> from MySQL.
>>> i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the
>>> bugs introduced by moz
2015 Jun 13
0
C5 : Firefox 38 bug
...rl-f> enter "find: whitelist", read all for more
whitelist info.
https://noscript.net/features#xss
https://noscript.net/faq#xss
then open noscript options select Advanced -> XSS, be sure both
selections are checked.
you should also register here;
https://forums.informaction.com/viewforum.php?f=3
to find out more about noscript and ask about 'hidden whitelist'.
for further protection when surfing, get the 'wot' [web of trust]
add-on;
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/wot-safe-browsing-tool/
https://www.mywot.com/
https://www.mywo...
2014 Dec 03
5
partedmagic connecting to a comcast address
i have been noticing a short connection burst in system monitor every
time i connect to internet.
i got curious and decided to run wireshark to see what was happening.
seems that i am connecting to 96.195.141.178 with destination of
"PartedMagic".
this seemed strange because i do not have PartedMagic installed, so
i ran a 'whois' check.
this is what it showed:
IP Location
2013 Oct 10
15
Remapping port below 1024 on the firewall
I give up and need help! I won''t add to the confusion by showing all the
combinations I have tried unsuccessfully... and yes, I''ve read FAQ2 and
FAQ2a many times!
When googling the subject of this post there are many answers that boil
down to using the same three iptables rules, two of which use nat. I
won''t repeat them here.
I don''t want to risk mixing