search for: inflicted

On Mar 4, 2014, at 10:48 PM, Duncan Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Related, should we require use of 'override' when methods override a base >>>>> class method? >>>> >>>> My vote: require override. >>> >>> +1: override is useful and prevents errors. >> Would it be too

...dap://a45ce9be-c350-4429-964b-a10c1dd92af5._msdcs.m2r.local> > > Try to find : a45ce9be-c350-4429-964b-a10c1dd92af5._msdcs.m2r.local > And check what that is, any old server, a running one? > > > > Greetz, > > Louis > > I wonder if this is sort of self inflicted ? The OP tried to join as a second DC, but this failed, he then tried again. I wonder if the first try set up something (and didn't remove it) that the second attempt doesn't like ? Rowland

...xternal script. > Well, I think it's far too complex and kerberos authentication should > be possible with BIND directly. > > No its not, its fairly easy, once you get your head around it. I have been using something based on that webpage for nearly 4 years now and only had self inflicted problems. Rowland

Hey All, I'm considering moving from CentOS 6 to CentOS 7. I'm not interested in dealing with Gnome 3. I've heard good things about Mate, a fork of Gnome 2. it appears that Mate is available in the EPEL repository associated with CentOS 7. Have any of you tried Mate on CentOS 7? In your experienced opinion what would I be giving up by abandoning Gnome 3 and installing Mate

...500, PAGESIZE >= 4096, so a headroom of 256 is no problem, and > we still have enough tailroom for skb_shared_info should we wrap > the buffer into a real SKB and push it into the stack. > > If you are trying to do buffering differently for virtio_net, well... > that's a self inflicted wound as far as I can tell. Right but I was wondering about the fact that this makes XDP_PASS much slower than processing skbs without XDP, as truesize is huge so we'll quickly run out of rmem space. When XDP is used to fight DOS attacks, why isn't this a concern? -- MST

...500, PAGESIZE >= 4096, so a headroom of 256 is no problem, and > we still have enough tailroom for skb_shared_info should we wrap > the buffer into a real SKB and push it into the stack. > > If you are trying to do buffering differently for virtio_net, well... > that's a self inflicted wound as far as I can tell. Right but I was wondering about the fact that this makes XDP_PASS much slower than processing skbs without XDP, as truesize is huge so we'll quickly run out of rmem space. When XDP is used to fight DOS attacks, why isn't this a concern? -- MST

Processing Conflict: speexdsp-1.2-0.9.rc3.el6.x86_64 conflicts speex <= 1.2-0.21.rc1 I am loath to replace things on my primary workstation as I have far too much to do as it is without dealing with self-inflicted injuries. However, I do use Jitsi as a softphone and the latest version has a dependency on a package in EPEL which replaces something from the base distro. Can someone inform me of what issues, if any, would replacing speex with speexdsp likely cause? I have a lot of packages that depend upon s...

...ts. > The first one seems to be a bug on DNS record generation. The second > one seems to be that I need to create PTR record manually. > > Can anyone confirm this? > > I'm going to correct it manually. > > Thanks. > I feel this must be, to a certain extent, self inflicted. When you first provision a Samba AD domain, there is no reverse zone, you have to create it and then add the DCs PTR record to it. When you join a Unix domain member, there is no code to add its PTR record to AD. Rowland

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> >

...intrinsic, we *have* to do frame layout of @_Z13do_some_thingRi *before* we can emit code for all the callers of @llvm.eh.get_capture_block. Today, this is easy, because module order defines emission order, but in the great glorious future, codegen will hopefully be parallelized, and then we've inflicted this horrible constraint on the innocent. > His suggestion to break the ordering dependence was to lock down the frame offset of the capture block to always be some fixed offset known by the target (ie ebp - 4 on x86, if we like that). Chandler probably has a better feel for this sort of thing...

I''m trying to create a sequence with no gaps in my db (contrived example, but should work out the same as my real one), and believe db-managed transactions are the way to go about this. It''s my first real ''go'' at transactions, so I may be mistaken about how things really work. Anyway.. Consider this example code: Class Invoice < ActiveRecord::Base def

...gt; Have any of you tried Mate on CentOS 7? In your experienced opinion >> what would I be giving up by abandoning Gnome 3 and installing Mate instead? > I'm using Mate on several C7 systems. The only issue is that now I > dont have to try to use that horrid Gnome thing they've inflicted on us! :) > I also run MATE on CentOS 7, for the same reasons. Only additional thing I did was to install the "nux" repo, along with the infinality font rpms, which drastically improved font rendering. For some reason, the default C7 desktop never looked as good as the default C6...

> To back up for a second, how much of this is self-inflicted damage? > IndVarSimplify likes to preemptively widen induction variables. Is > that why you have the extensions here in the first place? In the specific example I was talking about the zext came from our frontend (our FE used to insert these extensions for reasons that are no longer relevant...

On Mar 4, 2014, at 11:43 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Mar 4, 2014, at 10:48 PM, Duncan Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Related, should we require use of 'override' when methods override a base

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 03:53:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:45:37 +0200 > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 03:09:59PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > >> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:53:13 +0200 > >> >

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 03:53:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:45:37 +0200 > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 03:09:59PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > >> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:53:13 +0200 > >> >

On 12/19/2015 02:12 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/15/2015 07:05 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> The first time yum installs a package, it asks to import the GPG key >> used to sign the packages. Most people accept without validating the key. > > While that is true, it is important to note that yum will only import > keys that are already installed on disk, in

Well I am about to reserve a small padded room so I can bounce off the walls without inflicting tooo much damage... Nothing is making sense at this point. I tried several releases last night before settling on the latest CVS (seemed to work the best). Asterisk was running GREAT for the first few hours. Now since around 10AM EST SIP can't register and incoming calls are rejected with "all

...lpstat but it seems to be horribly inefficient, especially when 400 windows desktops query the samba server for print queue status (which it is unable to report anyway). In order to stop the samba/cups duo from crashing my server (doesn't really crash, it just can't do anything, like a self inflicted DOS attack) i have to map the samba lpq command to /bin/false. So here are my two questions: 1. Is it samba or cups that prevents samba from using a custom print command 2. What the heck is wrong with lpstat. Even a script that runs lpsat (multiple times) to collect different pieces of informat...

...er servers. What I have learnt so far is this; I created a new lab domain with an MS DC 2019. I then added a Samba 4.19-3 file server as a domain member w/o any issues. The clients are 2 Win 10 VM's for tests of shares, GPO's and related technologies. Still no issues that wasn't self-inflicted. File sharing with Samba and setting up permissions and group memberships worked as expected. I created GPO's for home directory, roaming profiles and folder redirection and verified these. Yesterday I fired up a Debian 12 and joined this as a DC. First attempt failed due to schema incompatibi...