Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "infatu".
Did you mean:
infaut
2008 Feb 07
5
pnorm
...a colleague and 5.2974E-16 from SAS. I tried to get around with mvtnorm package but it turns out to be using pnorm for univariate case. I should have missed some earlier discussions, but for the moment is there any short answer for a higher precision? Somehow these days, statistical geneticists are infatuated with such tiny p values!
Many thanks in advance,
Jing Hua
_________________________________________________________________
Telly addicts unite!
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2011 Feb 03
2
Queues and Agent penalty - how to go to second best agent when the first does not answer
...second best agent the
queue rings the same agent over and over and over again.
I've realized that it will only ring the second best agent only if the first
is unavailable or paused or inuse, but what happens when he`s on a bathroom
break? I`d like the queue to call them in order but not be infatuated with
its favorite agent. I know I could implement a log in log off system, which
I have done for other queues, but this queue needs to be kept simple with no
agent intervention when they leave for a few minutes.
Any ideas? Am I missing a parameter in queue.conf?
Mike
-----...
2014 May 27
4
[LLVMdev] Guidance on using pointers vs. references for function arguments
...codebase, and I don’t see much value in forcing the convention everywhere.
>
> Certainly.
>
> My suggestion: unless we have evidence this is confusing people trying to contribute to LLVM, then it isn't broken as is.
Chandler, Andy's recollection is correct.
I was personally infatuated by this idea and pushed it through a ton of the LLVM IR APIs (this was many years ago, (in the pre-1.0 days, and then again early in Clang's development because I'm a slow learner). It led to all sorts of weird cases where some arguments to IR objects would be taken by reference and so...
2006 Feb 27
3
Newbie Question
...please! I
started into J2EE/STRUTS, but was quickly frustrated by how long it
would take to code anything but relatively simple applications, and
while I continue to work the java, I knew I had to find something else.
Enter RoR - wow! I''m really in, well if not love, definitely deep
infatuation. Naturally, I''m starting to dig through the closet looking
for skeletons before entering into a meaningful relationship though.
The main question I have is: how does RoR play with bad DB design?
Most of the projects I''ve been working on have consisted of dealing with
conn...
2014 May 27
3
[LLVMdev] Guidance on using pointers vs. references for function arguments
On May 26, 2014, at 9:15 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> Chandler, Andy's recollection is correct.
>
> I was personally infatuated by this idea and pushed it through a ton of the LLVM IR APIs (this was many years ago, (in the pre-1.0 days, and then again early in Clang's development because I'm a slow learner). It led to all sorts of weird cases where some arguments to IR objects would be taken by reference and so...
2004 Dec 17
0
[Off Topic] humour, XMAS, ground loop - good business strategy
...tage, now he could see
This was Mike Fahrion from B&B!
"Saving your bacon today is my job
Restoring dude-ville, yessiree Bob
I have now come because one thing you forgot
Without changing bias, terminate you must not!"
He lectured to Steve all about termination
Bias and cost cuts and infatuation
And then with a wave of his hand he did turn
The stoplights of dude-ville to once again burn
All around dude-ville the happiness spread
The cars and the trucks they suddenly sped
Mirth and merriment and singing and cheer
Celebrating the happiest day of the year
Now Ground Loop stomped and he...
2014 May 27
3
[LLVMdev] Guidance on using pointers vs. references for function arguments
On May 26, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:
> This has been discussed before but I can’t find a reference to it. I could have sworn this was in the coding convention at some point. Here’s what I remember: during early LLVM development there was an effort to