search for: inf2cat

...ferent format, e.g. "XPX64,Server2003X64,VistaX64,Server2008X64,7X64,Server2008R2X64" These are presumably the ones that have to be matched against the version of the Windows the driver is installed into. Both per-file OSAttr and global OS are populated when the catalog is generated by inf2cat tool from Microsoft WDK (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff553618(v=vs.85).aspx), which takes the list of values in its /os command-line parameter. When the package is submitted for WHQL certification, MS regenerates the the catalog with its own signature and leaving only...

...ks OK, the way they are stored in the > *ISO image* in the same package doesn't. > > As for naming one can stick with what's being used in that virtio-win > rpm, i.e. > > {amd64,i386}/Win{XP,2003,2008,2008R2,2012,2012R2,7,8,8.1} > > or switch to the names passed to inf2cat in its /os parameter, i.e. > > XP_X86,Server2003_X86,...,8_X64,Server8_X64,6_3_X86,6_3_X64,Server6_3_X64 > (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff547089(v=vs.85).aspx) > > Whatever convention is chosen it needs to be followed thereafter. Yup - very important...

...tio-win package on the *filesystem* looks OK, the way they are stored in the *ISO image* in the same package doesn't. As for naming one can stick with what's being used in that virtio-win rpm, i.e. {amd64,i386}/Win{XP,2003,2008,2008R2,2012,2012R2,7,8,8.1} or switch to the names passed to inf2cat in its /os parameter, i.e. XP_X86,Server2003_X86,...,8_X64,Server8_X64,6_3_X86,6_3_X64,Server6_3_X64 (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff547089(v=vs.85).aspx) Whatever convention is chosen it needs to be followed thereafter. The main problem with this proposal is that I...

...t; > *ISO image* in the same package doesn't. > > > > As for naming one can stick with what's being used in that virtio-win > > rpm, i.e. > > > > {amd64,i386}/Win{XP,2003,2008,2008R2,2012,2012R2,7,8,8.1} > > > > or switch to the names passed to inf2cat in its /os parameter, i.e. > > > > XP_X86,Server2003_X86,...,8_X64,Server8_X64,6_3_X86,6_3_X64,Server6_3_X64 > > (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff547089(v=vs.85).aspx) > > > > Whatever convention is chosen it needs to be followed thereafte...

...same package doesn't. >> > >> > As for naming one can stick with what's being used in that virtio-win >> > rpm, i.e. >> > >> > {amd64,i386}/Win{XP,2003,2008,2008R2,2012,2012R2,7,8,8.1} >> > >> > or switch to the names passed to inf2cat in its /os parameter, i.e. >> > >> > XP_X86,Server2003_X86,...,8_X64,Server8_X64,6_3_X86,6_3_X64,Server6_3_X64 >> > (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff547089(v=vs.85).aspx) >> > >> > Whatever convention is chosen it needs to be...

+Li Jin ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vadim Rozenfeld" <vrozenfe@redhat.com> > To: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com> > Cc: "Roman Kagan" <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>, libguestfs@redhat.com, "Amnon Ilan" <ailan@redhat.com>, "Jeff Nelson" > <jenelson@redhat.com>, "Yan Vugenfirer"