search for: inexor

...> auth_tls = "sasl" > access_drivers = [ "polkit" ] > ... > tls_no_verify_certificate = 1 SASL and TLS in combination is already working without any faults. After activating access_drivers, the setup breaks, cause the access is denied. without polkit: > [root at inexor-test ~]# virsh --connect qemu+tls://vm0.host.b3be.de/system > Please enter your authentication name: inexor at vm0 > Please enter your password:? > Welcome to virsh, the virtualization interactive terminal. > ... with polkit: > [root at inexor-test ~]# virsh --connect qemu+tls://vm0...

...ildir) is on a NetApp NFS file server.) While I tweaked settings for the differences between the 1.0a5 conf file and the beta conf file, things are fundamentally the same between them. The other critical element to this is that imap-login sessions are being left around and the load average climbs inexorably. (It reached 50 on this dual dual-core machine before I killed things off and started the daemon from scratch.) This occurs for users using a whole array of clients: Thunderbird, SquirrelMail, Eudora, Apple Mail, etc. How can I track this down or can someone please help me figure out what is...

...ut one of the issues they're running into is support for Blocks in FreeBSD. On the one hand, they could try and back-port the gcc changes from http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/gcc/gcc-5646 and solve the problem that way or, on the other hand, they could just continue FreeBSD's inexorable march towards Clang and get the blocks support as part of compiler-rt. The only problem seems to be that the build support for Blocks in compiler-rt isn't wired up yet, which came as something of a surprise to all involved given that people have been talking about Clang and Blocks...

...es they're running into is support for > Blocks in FreeBSD. > > On the one hand, they could try and back-port the gcc changes from http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/gcc/gcc-5646 >  and solve the problem that way or, on the other hand, they could > just continue FreeBSD's inexorable march towards Clang and get the > blocks support as part of compiler-rt.  The only problem seems to be > that the build support for Blocks in compiler-rt isn't wired up yet, > which came as something of a surprise to all involved given that > people have been talking about Clang...

...ng into is support for >> Blocks in FreeBSD. >> >> On the one hand, they could try and back-port the gcc changes from http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/gcc/gcc-5646 >> and solve the problem that way or, on the other hand, they could >> just continue FreeBSD's inexorable march towards Clang and get the >> blocks support as part of compiler-rt. The only problem seems to be >> that the build support for Blocks in compiler-rt isn't wired up yet, >> which came as something of a surprise to all involved given that >> people have been tal...

people appear to born to compute. NY Escort (http://www.nycescortasiangirl.com) The numerical skills of children develop so early and so inexorably that it is easy to imagine an internal clock of mathematical maturity guiding their growth. NY Escorts (http://www.nycescortasiangirl.com) Not long after learning to walk and talk, they can set the table with impress accuracy---one knife, one spoon, one fork, for each of the five chairs. NY Asi...

Dear R People: Do we say that R is a programming language or a programming environment, please? Which is correct, please? Thanks in advance, Sincerely, Erin -- Erin Hodgess Associate Professor Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences University of Houston - Downtown mailto: erinm.hodgess at gmail.com

...for >>> Blocks in FreeBSD. >>> >>> On the one hand, they could try and back-port the gcc changes from http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/gcc/gcc-5646 >>> and solve the problem that way or, on the other hand, they could >>> just continue FreeBSD's inexorable march towards Clang and get the >>> blocks support as part of compiler-rt. The only problem seems to be >>> that the build support for Blocks in compiler-rt isn't wired up yet, >>> which came as something of a surprise to all involved given that >>> peop...

----- "Ben M." <centos at rivint.com> wrote: > Does this appear to be a sound procedure? I have one inline question. I read your version of the procedure and it looks like you want to skip the pvmove. That's fine, but it means more downtime (an unreliable estimate is one minuted per GB). In that case, you don't even need the snapshot. You won't need a point in time

...ich progress can be made. i'm fed up with the arbitrary way in which critical open source projects aren't, if you look at it critically, really making any _significant_ progress in _significant_ leaps or bounds to further _real_ business needs and problems, at a time when windows is moving inexorably further up its own behind, and people are just ... lapping it up because they don't BELIEVE they have any CHOICE [or they actually don't: e.g. where is the Open Source Passport clone for Mono to use?]. windows is getting more insidious, providing more and more "features" enab...