Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "inestimably".
Did you mean:
inestimable
2012 Apr 27
2
Flashphoner
Really? Me?
Oh Pavel! I would be inestimably honoured.
On 04/27/2012 01:55 AM, Pavel Ismailov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> My name is Pavel Ismailov
> and I`m CEO of www.flashphoner.com project.
>
> We noticed that you quite active in Asterisk-user
> mail list, and would like to offer you buy signature
> in your messages for...
2006 Aug 23
0
Random structure of nested design in lme
Why are the results not reliable?
________________________________
From: ESCHEN Rene [mailto:rene.eschen@unifr.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 3:48 AM
To: Spencer Graves; r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Cc: Doran, Harold
Subject: RE: [R] Random structure of nested design in lme
The output of the suggested lmer model looks very similar to the output of aov, also when I ran the model
2011 Aug 06
1
multcomp::glht() doesn't work for an incomplete factorial using aov()?
Hi R users,
I sent a message yesterday about NA in model estimates (
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/How-set-lm-to-don-t-return-NA-in-summary-td3722587.html).
If I use aov() instead of lm() I get no NA in model estimates and I use
gmodels::estimable() without problems. Ok!
Now I'm performing a lot of contrasts and I need correcting for
multiplicity. So, I can use multcomp::glht() for this.
2011 Jun 21
2
interaction between categorical variables
Dear R-users,
I need some assistance.
I am running some interactive variables for categorical variables.
I have dgen(2 levels converted to dummy variables) and dtoe(4-levels also converted to dummy variables). So I have worked with them in two ways:
i created a variable X1 = dgen*dtoe and I get an error "Error in dgen * dtoe : non-conformable arrays"then i run a glm, binomial