search for: inescapable

http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054 "# Set up SSL protection on your website." is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address, when i want to use ssl on my domain? thank you happy Christmas! :)

...ork to offer new features, performance, etc without deep concern for compatibility. - Camp B: LLD is a drop in replacement system linker (notably for COFF and ELF systems), which is best of breed and with no compromises w.r.t. that goal. I think the problem here is that these lead to natural and inescapable tensions, and Alex summarized how Camp B has been steering LLD away from what Camp A people want. This isn’t bad in and of itself, because what Camp B wants is clearly and unarguably good for LLVM. However, it is also not sufficient, and while innovation in the linker space (e.g. a new “native” o...

...a workaround ? - Same question for NT policies : I assume it is normal that windows 7 does not support NTconfig.pol files any longer. Nevertheless, is there a way to get the same features ? For these kind of functionality (having some control of user profiles on Win7 clients) , is AD the only and inescapable solution ? For my needs (200 domain users), NT domain was a sufficient solution and worked perfectly with XP. I am affraid that with Windows 7, I will have to move to something much more and unnecessarily complex :-( . Thanks in advance for your help. Henri ________________________________

...; - Same question for NT policies : I assume it is normal that windows 7 does > not support NTconfig.pol files any longer. Nevertheless, is there a way to > get the same features ? For these kind of functionality (having some control > of user profiles on Win7 clients) , is AD the only and inescapable solution > ? We create a local group policy that we copy from the server via logon script at logon time. Works great for bot WinXP and Windows 7. > For my needs (200 domain users), NT domain was a sufficient solution and > worked perfectly with XP. I am affraid that with Windows 7, I w...

...rmance, etc without deep concern for compatibility. > > - Camp B: LLD is a drop in replacement system linker (notably for COFF and > ELF systems), which is best of breed and with no compromises w.r.t. that > goal. > > > I think the problem here is that these lead to natural and inescapable > tensions, and Alex summarized how Camp B has been steering LLD away from > what Camp A people want. This isn’t bad in and of itself, because what > Camp B wants is clearly and unarguably good for LLVM. However, it is also > not sufficient, and while innovation in the linker space (e...

hi everyone, i feel like this problem should have come up a thousand times before but can't seem to find anything about on google. i am no expert and i don't know much samba lingo but i hope you understand me. If you open a symlink (or hard link for that matter) in windows (2000) over samba, say a blah.doc file, which looks like -rw-rw-r-- 1 francis galexia 2567 Feb 5 12:33

...>> compatibility. >> >> - Camp B: LLD is a drop in replacement system linker (notably for COFF >> and ELF systems), which is best of breed and with no compromises w.r.t. >> that goal. >> >> >> I think the problem here is that these lead to natural and inescapable >> tensions, and Alex summarized how Camp B has been steering LLD away from >> what Camp A people want. This isn’t bad in and of itself, because what >> Camp B wants is clearly and unarguably good for LLVM. However, it is also >> not sufficient, and while innovation in the...

..., all the time, regardless of what purpose the system is used for? This change to Anaconda is not security, it is theatre. It is directly equivalent to airport passenger security checks. Totally ineffectual but so intrusive and inconvenient that we have to believe that it works. For otherwise the inescapable conclusion is that we are all fools for putting up with it; and no-one likes to think of themselves as a fool. I call this the 'Buckley's Mixture' approach to social engineering. In any case, allowing an eight character password on credentials exposed to public network access is laugh...

...level of slimy nastiness." The knee- > >>>> jerk > >>>> reaction seems to be that this is a criticism of R. It is not. It is a > >>>> criticism of a poorly researched article. > >>>> > >>>> It also is an undeniable and inescapable fact that most S code runs > >>>> in R. > >>> > >>> The problem is not with criticism of the NY Times article, although > >>> as Pat > >>> Burns and others have pointed out this criticism was somewhat > >>> misdirected >...

Hi guys, After working for a long period of time on LLD, I think I found a few things that we should improve in the LLD design for both development ease and runtime performance. I would like to get feedback on this proposal. Thanks! *Problems with the current LLD architecture *The current LLD architecture has, in my opinion, two issues. *The atom model is not the best model for some architectures

...; - Camp B: LLD is a drop in replacement system linker (notably for COFF >>>> and ELF systems), which is best of breed and with no compromises w.r.t. >>>> that goal. >>>> >>>> >>>> I think the problem here is that these lead to natural and inescapable >>>> tensions, and Alex summarized how Camp B has been steering LLD away from >>>> what Camp A people want. This isn’t bad in and of itself, because what >>>> Camp B wants is clearly and unarguably good for LLVM. However, it is also >>>> not suffici...

...res, performance, etc without deep concern for compatibility. > > - Camp B: LLD is a drop in replacement system linker (notably for COFF and ELF systems), which is best of breed and with no compromises w.r.t. that goal. > > > I think the problem here is that these lead to natural and inescapable tensions, and Alex summarized how Camp B has been steering LLD away from what Camp A people want. This isn’t bad in and of itself, because what Camp B wants is clearly and unarguably good for LLVM. However, it is also not sufficient, and while innovation in the linker space (e.g. a new “native” o...

Having read through Stackless Python's web pages a bit: 1. They're doing pretty much what I'd like to do, except that I don't want to be tied to a particular language and I'd like to be able to use the stack. (Also, stack use is inescapable with LLVM, as far as I can tell). 2. We should be able to support "hard switching" in Stackless Python by adding a llvm.getcontextstacktop intrinsic. If, as in Kristján's example, llvm.getcontext is used to create context A, and then execution continues until context B is created wi...

On the other hand, stack manipulation really ought to be handled by the target, since only the target knows the details of how the stack is laid out to begin with. Also, if we have stack manipulation calls in the IR, optimization quickly becomes very difficult. Unless we just allow optimizers to ignore the stack manipulations and assume they're doing the "right" thing. On the

Hi everyone, I''m new to Rails and Ruby, and have been working my way through the Pickaxe and Agile Rails books for the last week or so. With a background in payroll apps I found that the default ActiveRecord mapping of decimal columns to float variables really bothered me! Financial calcs need high levels of accuracy and floats just don''t give you that. I know there are a bunch

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:52:55PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > I think the problem here is that these lead to natural and inescapable > tensions, and Alex summarized how Camp B has been steering LLD away > from what Camp A people want. This isn’t bad in and of itself, because > what Camp B wants is clearly and unarguably good for LLVM. However, > it is also not sufficient, and while innovation in the linker space &g...

In another thread on this list, various wild allegations have been made, relating to the New York Times article on R. I object both to the subject line and to the content of several of the messages, and will not repeat or quote any of that content. It smacks to me of mischief making. Discussion has centered around the following quote from the NY Times article: ?According to them, the

...to committing a problematic patch before you leave - you should > expect/hope it is reverted quickly so that you're not interrupting > everyone's work for a week. Absolutely not! Committing a patch and going on holidays is a disrespectful act. Bot maintainers going on holidays is an inescapable fact. Silencing a bot while the maintainer is a possible way around, but disabling it is most disrespectful. However, I'd like to remind you of the confirmation bias problem, where people will look at the bot, think it's noise, silence the bot when they could have easily fixed it. Later o...

...ld have to be derelict of duty to not have done so. Bernstein's machine, once built, will have power requirements in the MW to operate, but in return will be able to break a 1024-bit RSA or DH key in seconds to minutes. Even under the most optimistic estimates for present-day PKI adoption, the inescapable conclusion is that the NSA, its major foreign intelligence counterparts, and any foreign commercial competitors provided with commercial intelligence by their national intelligence services have the ability to break on demand any and all 1024-bit public keys. The security implications of a practic...

A thought occurred to me to on how to further quantify the impact of "glare" on a properly dimensioned trunk group and debunk the ground start glare concern. A cursory traffic analysis clarifies: 1. Assume you have a two-way trunk group, dimensioned for average busy hour, average busy season for P01 grade of service, Erlang B or Poison distribution. 2. Further assume that the