search for: inefficently

Author: kchow Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 6c5e7d7096ce47499922b13d2536fb929f6c843f Log message: 6286816 page_numtopp_nolock is inefficent 6288107 Missing comment terminator in i86pc/ml/locore.s 6290613 high page_get_cachelist failure rate on jurassic 6297005 performance issues with page_nextn() Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/os/mem_cage.c update: usr/src/uts/common/sys/cpuvar.h

hi, I have been trying to do this in R (have implemented it in Excel) but I have been using a very inefficent way (loops etc.). I have matrix A (columns are years and ages are rows) and matrix B (columns are birth yrs and rows are ages) I would like to first turn matrix A into matrix B And then I would like to convert matrix B back again to the original matrix A. (I have left out details of

Hello Suppose I have a matrix mat=(1:16,2) [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [1,] 1 5 9 13 [2,] 2 6 10 14 [3,] 3 7 11 15 [4,] 4 8 12 16 I just want to use the "apply" function to the matrix partially there is a vector end=c(2,3,1,3) #sum the 1st 2 numbers of the 1st column #sum the 1st 3 numbers of the 2nd column #sum the 1st number of the 3rd column

I've been researching the state of 'file alteration monitoring' technology on Linux. Famd uses dnotify to inefficently monitor a handful of directories. The replacement for dnotify is being worked on in the kenel and it's called inotify. If I understand it correctly and they get it finished, it would be an awesome addition to rsync. With it, you could run rsync to update a remote system (push mode) and keep...

Hi everyone, I ve been using R for months and find it really practical and straight forward. However (the inevitable however), I am finding it very slow for one of my operations: it s basically an itertation over i and j in a pretty big table (4* 4608). It takes 30 minutes!!!! Thanks Ps:if it can help here is the source: median1<-matrix(nrow=4608,ncol=1)

I''m finding that I''m writing sets of very similar scenarios to check access permissions for each of my actions. Does anyone have suggestions on how to dry this up: Given an existing Account And a logged in Admin When the user visits account/manage Then he should get access Given an existing Account And a logged in Manager When the user visits account/manage Then he should get

I've updated CentOS 4.0 to 4.1 on several machines (some desktops, some servers). However on my laptop, update is failing with following error just after headers are downloaded: --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.3.4-2 for package: glibc --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.3.4-2 is needed by package

Replacing my current media server with another larger capacity media server. Also switching over to solaris/zfs. Anyhow we have 24 drive capacity. These are for large sequential access (large media files) used by no more than 3 or 5 users at a time. I''m inquiring as to what the best configuration for this is for vdevs. I''m considering the following configurations 4 x x6

Would it be worthwhile to implement heuristics to auto-tune ''recordsize'', or would that not be worth the effort? -- Regards, Jeremy

Hi all, Here is the v5 of my patches series applying the latest comments from Pino. Cédric Bosdonnat (10): lib/osinfo.c: Extract xml processing into a callback lib: extract osinfo DB traversing API mllib: ocaml wrapper for lib/osinfo builder: rename docs test script builder: add a template parameter to get_index builder: add Index.write_entry function dib: move do_cp to