Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "individuar".
Did you mean:
individual
2018 Oct 02
0
Unable to add additional domain controller - uncaught exception - LDAP error 10 on join
...d DC, but this failed, he then tried
> again. I wonder if the first try set up something (and didn't remove
> it) that the second attempt doesn't like ?
>
> Rowland
>
Sorry for my bad english but here I not understand what you mean.
---
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
2018 Oct 01
2
Unable to add additional domain controller - uncaught exception - LDAP error 10 on join
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:14:09 +0200
"L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hai Fabio,
>
> We dont mind crappy english...
> At least not me, I'm the same, lots of typos. You will learn it, the
> more you type it. ;-)
>
> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-February/214118.html
> Shows exact the same, but not solution.
2018 Oct 09
2
Question about domain controller replication limit
...ble restore for other issue not related to domain
itself)
I know there was important drs changes in samba 4.5, if the answer are
different based on samba version the answer can be about samba>=4.5
Thanks for any reply and sorry for my bad english.
---
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
2018 Oct 01
3
Unable to add additional domain controller - uncaught exception - LDAP error 10 on join
...line 1151, in
do_join
ctx.join_add_objects()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/join.py", line 630, in
join_add_objects
ctx.samdb.modify(m)
Can someone help me please?
Thanks for any reply and sorry for my bad english.
---
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
2018 Oct 02
0
Unable to add additional domain controller - uncaught exception - LDAP error 10 on join
..._FLAGS=1>;<RMD_INVOCID=725f5ec4-75c7-4888-89a6-4fc935c7eb63>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=101922>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=101922>;<RMD_VERSION=13>;CN=Amministrazione,OU=Accounts,DC=m2r,DC=local
And others are same type.
Thanks for any reply.
---
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
2018 Oct 03
0
Unable to add additional domain controller - uncaught exception - LDAP error 10 on join
...dows 2008r2 dc for it because was impossible have duo active
directory sync working connecting to samba4 dc.
I don't know if duo issue is related to something not working in samba
main controller but other windows/linux client seems ok with domain.
---
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
2018 Oct 03
1
Unable to add additional domain controller - uncaught exception - LDAP error 10 on join
On 10/02/2018 05:21 PM, Fabio Fantoni via samba wrote:
> I updated both the linux domain controllers to samba 4.8.5, changed
> the hostname of server I tried to add as dc but same error:
>
>> samba-tool domain join m2r.local DC -Uadministrator --realm=m2r.local
>> --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --option='idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes'
>> Finding a writeable DC for
2018 Oct 02
2
Unable to add additional domain controller - uncaught exception - LDAP error 10 on join
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 15:21:03 +0200
Fabio Fantoni <fabio.fantoni at m2r.biz> wrote:
> Il 02/10/2018 11:03, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto:
> > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 10:33:35 +0200
> > Fabio Fantoni <fabio.fantoni at m2r.biz> wrote:
> >
> >> Il 01/10/2018 17:33, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto:
> >>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:14:09 +0200
>
2018 Oct 02
3
Unable to add additional domain controller - uncaught exception - LDAP error 10 on join
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 10:33:35 +0200
Fabio Fantoni <fabio.fantoni at m2r.biz> wrote:
> Il 01/10/2018 17:33, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto:
> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:14:09 +0200
> > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hai Fabio,
> >>
> >> We dont mind crappy english...
> >> At least