search for: indivdually

DHH asked for more documentation. Are those patches submitted indivdually per method or per module documented? Or are they submitted as some giant patch? Michael Genereux SimianCodex

Hi All, I have two data frames. The first contains data about a number of individuals, coded in the first column with a name, in an order I find convenient. The second contains different data about the same indivduals, in a different order. Both data frame have the individual names in the first column. I need to reorder the second data frame so the rows are rearranged in the same manner as

I have a frustrating issue which I am hoping someone may have a suggestion about. I am running XP and R 2.12.0 and saved an EXCEL file that I was sent as a csv file. The initial code I ran follows. dec <- read.csv("g://FMH/FO30122010.csv",header=T) dec.open <- subset (dec, Status == "Open") table(dec.open$AMHS) I was checking the output and noticed a difference

I am trying to sync several specific files over ssh. This works fine when I specify the files indivdually, a la: rsync -av --rsync-path=/usr/local/bin/rsync /etc/passwd remotehost:/etc/passwd What I want to do though, is update several files at once, a la: rsync -av --rsync-path=/usr/local/bin/rsync --include-from updatesys.inc remotehost: See below for updatesys.inc. The file list gets generated j...

Hi, For further calculations I need to extract indivdual Variances of different random effects from a fitted model. I found out how to extract the correlations (VarCorr(m1)@reSumry$group1) but I was not able to find a way to extract the other components individually. To extract the Residuals I tried: (ranef(m1)@ stdErr) which unfortunately did not work. Thank you very much for your help!

Dear R users, can anybody explain me why the function glmmPQL(.) behaves in different ways, depending on the number of measurements/individuals you use? To show you this, I generated two examples. The first one includes 20 indivduals with each 100 repeated measurements (binary response), the second one includes 40 individuals. The 'individuals' differ only in different x values. I

> -----Original Message----- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:01 PM > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Alex Williamson; Alexander Graf; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; Sethi Varun-B16395; > virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; Antonios Motakis; kvm at vger.kernel.org list; kvm- > ppc at vger.kernel.org; kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu

> -----Original Message----- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:01 PM > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Alex Williamson; Alexander Graf; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; Sethi Varun-B16395; > virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; Antonios Motakis; kvm at vger.kernel.org list; kvm- > ppc at vger.kernel.org; kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu

Have a look at merge. Ciao Vittorio >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: f.calboli at imperial.ac.uk >Data: 23-giu-2006 18.10 >A: "r-help"<r- help at stat.math.ethz.ch> >Ogg: [R] rearranging data frame rows > >Hi All, > >I have two data frames. The first contains data about a number of individuals, >coded in the first column with a name, in an order

...setup. I have various shares which have access to them by valid user = @unixgroup Some of the users in any particular group can get access whilst others cant. The curious thing is that this setup worked happily for some months and then, suddenly, it doesn't. I am now forced to list the users indivdually . I am open to ideas . Any and all help appreciated. Greg Andrews System Manager RGTechnologies Pty Ltd 606 Skipton Street Ballarat 3350 613 53363603 0417 511 731 andrews@rgt.com.au

There seems to be a great deal of talk about adding every conceivable type of metadata to vorbis. Everyone sees this as an opportunity to add the little obscure feature they've always wanted. I don't know if Monty will agree, but I think for the most part this transcends the scope of vorbis. I think it would be much more appropriate to create some sort of general-purpose framing format

On 07/16/2013 04:51:12 PM, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote: > > > 3. VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO > > > > > > No changes needed, except perhaps adding a new flag. Freescale > > > has some > > > devices with regions that must be mapped cacheable. > > > > While I don't object to making the information available to the user > > just

> -----Original Message----- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 5:32 PM > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > Cc: Alex Williamson; Alexander Graf; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; Sethi Varun-B16395; > virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; Antonios Motakis; kvm at vger.kernel.org list; kvm- > ppc at vger.kernel.org; kvmarm at

> -----Original Message----- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 5:32 PM > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > Cc: Alex Williamson; Alexander Graf; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; Sethi Varun-B16395; > virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; Antonios Motakis; kvm at vger.kernel.org list; kvm- > ppc at vger.kernel.org; kvmarm at

Hi all, yesterday we had a drive failure on a fc-al jbod with 14 drives. Suddenly the zpool using that jbod stopped to respond to I/O requests and we get tons of the following messages on /var/adm/messages: Sep 3 15:20:10 fb2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /scsi_vhci/disk at g20000004cfd81b9f (sd52): Sep 3 15:20:10 fb2 SCSI transport failed: reason ''timeout'':

Hello, What follows is my attempt to describe how poison works. Let me know what you think. -- David # LLVM Poison Semantics Poison is an LLVM concept which exists solely to enable further optimization of LLVM IR. The exact behavior of poison has been, to say the least, confusing for users, researchers and engineers working with LLVM. This document hopes to clear up some of the confusion