search for: indisputable

...topics. I feel like you have just stated that sex is unpopular and very unusual. I don't see how you can possibly say it is very unusual. Everyone is doing it. You are doing it too. You are doing it and yet you are saying it is absurd. If it is absurd, why are you doing it?! It is an indisputable fact that the majority of software is fully compiled to native code files BEFORE being launched, not during. If anything is unusual, it is JIT that is unusual. JIT is the behavior in the minority -- there is no doubting that fact. JIT is the unusual one. I don't want JIT. At this very...

...e more information. Also, some people asked me questions. You don't expect me to ignore their questions, do you? Jon Harrop, for example, asked an important question that I needed to reply to. > Fine, thats your opinion based upon your definition of a > complete backend. It is an indisputable and agreed FACT that LLVM alone by itself is incapable of generating a ready-to-execute .EXE or .DLL file. > Point made. Please move on. Oh come on, it is not like I have been harping about this for weeks. My first message to this mailing list was only *3* days ago! And the total number...

Hi all, i want to replace a bunch of Apple Xserves with Xraids and HFS+ (brr) by Sun x4200 with SAS-Jbods and ZFS. The application will be the Helios UB+ fileserver suite. I installed the latest Solaris 10 on a x4200 with 8gig of ram and two Sun SAS controllers, attached two sas-jbods with 8 SATA-HDDs each und created a zfs pool as a raid 10 by doing something like the following: [i]zpool create

...e to contribute so fast? > Just like the GCC you were holding up as an example of a > complete back-end solution. Logic not a strong point in > your part of the world? My point was that LLVM alone by itself is incapable of producing a ready-to-execute .EXE or .DLL, and this fact is indisputable and agreed by all. >> Also, "gas" is not available on Windoze. > http://tinyurl.com/64vnua Ah you've sent me to a Bart Simpson page. My 2 young kids watch the Simpsons. I don't. > And see where the other people in the other thread tell > you to just redistrib...

hello Sean, On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > I'd really prefer this patch (series or single) is not accepted. This > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I usually wouldn't expect > sympathy here, but the questionable benefit does not outweigh the cost > IM[biased]O. I agree that

hello Sean, On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > I'd really prefer this patch (series or single) is not accepted. This > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I usually wouldn't expect > sympathy here, but the questionable benefit does not outweigh the cost > IM[biased]O. I agree that

Hi, I would like to apply the L-BFGS optimization algorithm to compute the MLE of a multilevel multinomial Logistic Regression. The likelihood formula for this model has as one of the summands the formula for computing the likelihood of an ordinary (single-level) multinomial logit regression. So I would basically need the R implementation for this formula. The L-BFGS algorithm also requires

> the main advantage it has over SPSS-like software is that you do not > need to explicitly create dummy variables. You only need to specify > your dependent variable and independent variables and R will fit it > (and create dummy variables automatically) for you. Does the audience know exactly what the creation of dummy variables in SPSS is and means? If not, they might consider