search for: indexlist

.../best methode is. And is there any reason i should not do this, i did search on the wiki, but could not find the info i searched for. I know the following. Checked the current index. ( source info : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LDB ) ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b @INDEXLIST So i have a current list of indexes set and i did see that i miss and what i want. I want to index one/several of my mail attributes for zarafa/kopano. zarafaAccount/kopanoAccount Can someone or guide me a bit or point my to the correct info howto do this, since i dont want to mess up my AD. ;-)...

I have a large installation >20k users. We're using samba4 for AD Authentication, and also email address validation. I'm trying to edit the @INDEXLIST in sam.ldb to add an index on otherMailbox to speed up searches (0.05 sec for indexed, vs 2.5 sec for non-indexed searches) I'm finding that when I use ldbedit to do this, it appears to add the additional @IDXATTR. However, when I go back and check via ldbsearch, the attribute is not there. S...

...programming in one directory and recently switched to another directory. It appears that in doing so I've uncovered a problem. My environment was saving something so that my code would work and now I don't know how to fix it. I have the following bit of code: for(i in 1:index){ indexList = lst[i] for(j in 2:jobs-1){ indexList = c(indexList,lst[i+index*j]) } saveList[i,] = indexList } for (i in 1:index){ m[i] = median(saveList[i,]) } m In my new directory, I am getting the complaint that "object m is not found." Does anyone know what th...

...k.tmp failed to copy DC=WWW,DC=EXAMPLE,DC=COM.ldb If I run ldbsearch -H "DC=WWW,DC=EXAMPLE,DC=COM.ldb" -a > www.example.com.ldif I get a text file containing a text dump of my directory. I can reload this into a new tdb file using ldbadd, but only if I remove the one object called @INDEXLIST. Without removing this object, ldbadd simply hangs, and then eventually dies with the following error: ltdb: tdb(newfile.ldb): tdb_transaction_cancel: no transaction Failed to commit transaction: Failed to store index records in transaction commit: Other So, my question is: am I on the right tra...

...usable.. The > mail server was previously on OpenLDAP and there was not performance > issues. > > A simple LDAP query can take up to 25 sec to perform !! > > We have added some indexes : > > [root at califix ~]# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b > @INDEXLIST > # record 1 > dn: @INDEXLIST > @IDXONE: 1 > @IDXVERSION: 2 > @IDXATTR: objectClass > @IDXATTR: msDS-Cached-Membership-Time-Stamp > @IDXATTR: userPrincipalName > @IDXATTR: rpcNsInterfaceID > @IDXATTR: fileExtPriority > @IDXATTR: dnsRoot > @IDXATTR: mSMQLabelEx >...

...amba] [Samba 4.5] Very slow LDAP Queries (almost unusable), performance tunning ? No, you have to do that manualy, or look the the samba4 ADS script for kopano ( or zarafa ) But I mostly follow the documentation.   And when i run : time ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b @INDEXLIST .... real    0m0.230s user    0m0.184s sys     0m0.044s   so if yours take more that 20 sec there is something very wrong. I suggest check you samba AD database and samba4 ADDC setup, i dont think this is zarafa related.     Greetz,   Louis           Van: Gaetan SLONGO [mail...

Dear R-users Im working with a dataset that contains information for 8 groups of data and I need to select a sample of certain size (100 cubic feet by group) from this database for each of these 8 groups. To clarify, here is the starting code Im working with: k<-nrow(dataset) ix<-sort(runif(k),index.return=TRUE)$ix M<-max(which(cumsum(dataset$volume[ix])<100))+1

No, you have to do that manualy, or look the the samba4 ADS script for kopano ( or zarafa ) But I mostly follow the documentation.   And when i run : time ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b @INDEXLIST .... real    0m0.230s user    0m0.184s sys     0m0.044s   so if yours take more that 20 sec there is something very wrong. I suggest check you samba AD database and samba4 ADDC setup, i dont think this is zarafa related.     Greetz,   Louis           Van: Gaetan SLONGO [mail...

...erformance tunning ?  > > No, you have to do that manualy, or look the the samba4 ADS script > for kopano ( or zarafa )  > > But I mostly follow the documentation.  > > > > And when i run :  > > time ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b > @INDEXLIST  > > ....  > > real 0m0.230s  > > user 0m0.184s  > > sys 0m0.044s  > > > > so if yours take more that 20 sec there is something very wrong.  > > I suggest check you samba AD database and samba4 ADDC setup,  > > i dont think this is zarafa rel...

...age. This latency makes the mail server unusable.. The mail server was previously on OpenLDAP and there was not performance issues. A simple LDAP query can take up to 25 sec to perform !! We have added some indexes : [root at califix ~]# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b @INDEXLIST # record 1 dn: @INDEXLIST @IDXONE: 1 @IDXVERSION: 2 @IDXATTR: objectClass @IDXATTR: msDS-Cached-Membership-Time-Stamp @IDXATTR: userPrincipalName @IDXATTR: rpcNsInterfaceID @IDXATTR: fileExtPriority @IDXATTR: dnsRoot @IDXATTR: mSMQLabelEx @IDXATTR: dNSTombstoned @IDXATTR: msDS-Phonetic...

...mba] [Samba 4.5] Very slow LDAP Queries (almost unusable), performance tunning ? No, you have to do that manualy, or look the the samba4 ADS script for kopano ( or zarafa ) But I mostly follow the documentation. And when i run : time ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b @INDEXLIST .... real 0m0.230s user 0m0.184s sys 0m0.044s so if yours take more that 20 sec there is something very wrong. I suggest check you samba AD database and samba4 ADDC setup, i dont think this is zarafa related. Greetz, Louis Van: Gaetan SLONGO [mailto:gslongo at...

...formance tunning ? > > No, you have to do that manualy, or look the the samba4 ADS script > for kopano ( or zarafa ) > > But I mostly follow the documentation. > > > > And when i run : > > time ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b > @INDEXLIST > > .... > > real 0m0.230s > > user 0m0.184s > > sys 0m0.044s > > > > so if yours take more that 20 sec there is something very wrong. > > I suggest check you samba AD database and samba4 ADDC setup, > > i dont think this is zarafa rel...

...mba] [Samba 4.5] Very slow LDAP Queries (almost unusable), performance tunning ? No, you have to do that manualy, or look the the samba4 ADS script for kopano ( or zarafa ) But I mostly follow the documentation. And when i run : time ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b @INDEXLIST .... real 0m0.230s user 0m0.184s sys 0m0.044s so if yours take more that 20 sec there is something very wrong. I suggest check you samba AD database and samba4 ADDC setup, i dont think this is zarafa related. Greetz, Louis Van: Gaetan SLONGO [mailto:gslongo at...

...gt; And is there any reason i should not do this, i did search on the wiki, but could not find the info i searched for. > > I know the following. Checked the current index. ( source info : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LDB ) > ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b @INDEXLIST > So i have a current list of indexes set and i did see that i miss and what i want. > > I want to index one/several of my mail attributes for zarafa/kopano. > zarafaAccount/kopanoAccount > > Can someone or guide me a bit or point my to the correct info howto do this, since i do...

...variable to add to it is a rowname of the experimental matrix: print(rownames(Control[j,])) [1] "505E01" I haven't found a way to combine these three - I would like a vector c("507D22","518F15","505E01") - to subscript the matrix of experimental data. IndexList <- c(as.vector( seed_panel[ i, ], mode="any"), rownames( Control[ j, ] ) ) Gives: $V2 [1] 507D22 18 Levels: 507D22 518F15 522C17 522K21 523A19 528H06 528P11 530H18 ... 585K18 $V3 [1] 518F15 20 Levels: 518F15 522C17 522K21 523A19 528H06 528P11 530H18 534L09 ... 590C18 [[3]] [1] &quo...

Lookup in the Windows setup where indexing is applied. And, upgrade you os +samba (as Rowland also said). Indexing on ad-object greatly improved in later samba versions. ldbsearch -H "$(samba -b|grep PRIVATE_DIR |awk '{ print $NF }')/sam.ldb" -s base -b @INDEXLIST Will show you the index one's in samba. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Sinan Ozturk via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 27 augustus 2020 12:48 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [...

..../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/schema_load.c:117" Based on the advice here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2010-December/075239.html ... I tried to manually remove the index by doing this: /srv/adsrv/bin/ldbedit -H /srv/adsrv/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b \@INDEXLIST ... and clearing out the index to the example given in the above link. Or even just removing one entry. However, any modifications fail with a similar error to the above reindex command: =========================== ltdb: tdb(/srv/adsrv/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=AD,DC(domain name).ldb)...

...kup first). > > This is unfortunate. My suggestion is that you use ldbdump and then > ldbadd to re-build the backend databases (the things in sam.ldb.d/ that > we generally say not to touch) and then try the script again. You may > with to manually avoid adding the index controls (@INDEXLIST) and let > Samba re-add them once you get back to 4.7. > > This is the bug for a fixed Samba 4.8 upgrade: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13335 > > Anyway, the data should still be in there, it just might be a little > harder to find. > > I'm very so...

Hello, Today I tried to upgrade to samba 4.8.0, the upgrade seems to have failed, and I can't seem to fix it or back out. The issue seems to be I've lost the some KRB tickets. Here's and example of the errors i get: samba-tool domain exportkeytab /tmp/test2 samba_kdc_fetch: could not find own KRBTGT in DB: dsdb_search at ../source4/dsdb/common/util.c:4641 ERROR(runtime): uncaught

...index:uid = yes > dbindex:uidNumber = yes > dbindex:gidNumber = yes > dbindex:memberUid = yes > dbindex:sAMAccountName = yes > ldb:max-cachesize = 10000000 I'm not sure these options do anything. Something like this ldbsearch -s base -b @INDEXLIST will show you what is indexed. It is set by the schema. > ldap timeout = 2 > ldap replication sleep = 1000 These also are not relevant to the AD DC, as far as I know. > Are there any performance parameters for LDB databases or an alternative to LDB for better scalabilit...