Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "indexingtester".
2008 Mar 18
0
[LLVMdev] Array Dependence Analysis
...level could be pluggable allowing to interchange or chain
core dependency testing techniques. I think there will be no use in
making pluggable the higher ones (please, correct me if I am wrong).
This approach would require to divide the analysis structure into two
parts, say; DependenceAnalysis and IndexingTester.
That said, I must admit I haven't made it that way in my prototype. I
have it in mind, but I'm currently trying to keep things simple and just
to check whether the precision of my implementation is worth anything.
> Sounds good. If you have the interface nailed down, it would be good...
2008 Mar 17
3
[LLVMdev] Array Dependence Analysis
>> As part of the advanced compilers course semester project (at
>> UIUC), we
>> are starting to implement array dependence analysis for LLVM.
Great! This is something we've needed for a long time.
> I'm currently working on a similar project and hoping to finish it in
> about two weeks.
Cool! I think the most critical part of this is to get a good
2008 Mar 20
1
[LLVMdev] Array Dependence Analysis
...luggable allowing to interchange or chain
>core dependency testing techniques. I think there will be no use in
>making pluggable the higher ones (please, correct me if I am wrong).
>This approach would require to divide the analysis structure into two
>parts, say; DependenceAnalysis and IndexingTester.
>
>That said, I must admit I haven't made it that way in my prototype. I
>have it in mind, but I'm currently trying to keep things simple and just
>to check whether the precision of my implementation is worth anything.
>
>> Sounds good. If you have the interface naile...
2008 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Array Dependence Analysis
...lowing to interchange or
> chain
> core dependency testing techniques. I think there will be no use in
> making pluggable the higher ones (please, correct me if I am wrong).
> This approach would require to divide the analysis structure into two
> parts, say; DependenceAnalysis and IndexingTester.
This all sounds great to me!
> That said, I must admit I haven't made it that way in my prototype. I
> have it in mind, but I'm currently trying to keep things simple and
> just
> to check whether the precision of my implementation is worth anything.
I'm fine with star...