search for: independendly

Hi, have got anybody experience or a starting point for me, how i can program a function which calculate me a probability transition matrix with a data.frame and two states. I have some independend variable and a class variable for two states - in example one from Jan2003 and the same variables from June2003. Now i would like to calculate the probability that PERSON X change from classA to

Hello, for my meta-analysis I try to test if two varainces are equal without using the raw scores. I have is the SD's, N's and the Means. I want to test the variances from dependent and independend samples. I assume I can use the var.test procedure for the independent samples, but what about the dependent samples ? Has anyone an idea how to realise this with R ? Thanks in advance

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to comp.protocols.smb as well. Hi, I'm trying to implement file system quotas on a Debian Woody Linux box. My problem is that W2k Explorer silently truncates files when going over quota by copying files. Other applications work as expected and show a "disk full" error message. To me it looks like the

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > >>> 4. CDDL annoys a lot of people. >> >> The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS enemies. > > The following irritates me, I am a ?people,? and I am not an OSS enemy: > > http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatAboutTheLicensingIssue It is

...da two headers ( Return-Path and Delivered-To ). > Then dovecot-lda delivers successfully and the original message > contents are lost. Steffen Kaiser rightly points out: > That's the problem of the used Unix pipe and broken by design. The right > member of the pipe (preline) runs independendly of dspam and recieves no > content via pipe. Why should preline or dovecot-lda believe there is an > error? [... and suggests a wrapper script that aborts delivery on empty > dspam output.] I'm not sure if it's appropriate under your circumstances, but you can also pass stderr to...

...ang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > 3. How to parallelize post-IPO stage > ==================================== > > From 5k' high, the concept is very simple, just to > step 1).divide the merged IR into small pieces, > step 2).and compile each of this pieces independendly. > step 3) the objects of each piece are fed back to linker to are linked > into an executable, or a dynamic lib. You seem to be describing GCC's strategy for whole program optimization (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimization). What is a bit confusing in your descrip...

Hi, I'm using qmail + dspam + dovecot-lda. A typical .qmail file : | /usr/bin/dspam --client --deliver=stdout --user "$EXT@$USER" | /usr/bin/preline -f /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d "$EXT@$USER" -a "$EXT@$USER" -m "$EXT2" When dspam segfault or is killed, preline receive an empty content and only pass to dovecot-lda two headers ( Return-Path and

Hi, I think I get what you?re saying with the separate setups thing. I would be totally fine with doing it all that way but am not quite sure how to set it all up. Any help would be very much appreciated here. I can?t say I know much about scripting. > On Nov 11, 2015, at 8:18 PM, Scott Winterstein <0turn1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > You have to setup a fallback type of setup. You

Christian -- You don't provide enough information (like a call) to answer this. I suspect, though, that you may be subsetting in a way that passes randomForest no data. I'm not aware offhand of an easy way to get this error from randomForest. I tried creating some data superficially similar to yours to see whether something would break if there were only a single value in the variable

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective work" and the > GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend work ZFS of > course. Which countries' copyright laws would permit that explicitly even when some of the

...m> wrote: > >> 3. How to parallelize post-IPO stage >> ==================================== >> >> From 5k' high, the concept is very simple, just to >> step 1).divide the merged IR into small pieces, >> step 2).and compile each of this pieces independendly. >> step 3) the objects of each piece are fed back to linker to are linked >> into an executable, or a dynamic lib. > You seem to be describing GCC's strategy for whole program > optimization (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimization). Hi, Diego: Than...

Hi, On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > But we do already have something very similar with signed integer > overflow. If the compiler can see a way to generate faster code that > does not handle the overflow case, then the semantics suddenly change > from twos-complement arithmetic to something very strange. The standard > does not specify all the ways that the

...t;> 3. How to parallelize post-IPO stage >>> ==================================== >>> >>> From 5k' high, the concept is very simple, just to >>> step 1).divide the merged IR into small pieces, >>> step 2).and compile each of this pieces independendly. >>> step 3) the objects of each piece are fed back to linker to are >>> linked >>> into an executable, or a dynamic lib. >> >> You seem to be describing GCC's strategy for whole program >> optimization (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTi...

hello all. I run a station which uses one primary mount to broadcast from. when DJs are not on air, we want to stream a playlist of music. I have a program taking care of that for us, but now I?m at a standstill. When our automation connects to our primary mount point no DJ can connect to broadcast. So, I?m assuming I need to work something out with a fallback mount point but don?t quite get how

I want to run dhcp and shorewall on the same computer.It is my gateway and that computer doing NAT for my network.How can I set up shorewall to let only users that get theire static ip address via dhcp, not to let users that had static address.

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > > > >>> 4. CDDL annoys a lot of people. > >> > >> The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS enemies. > > > > The following irritates me, I am a ?people,? and I am not an OSS

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling > <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > > > If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective work" and the > > GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend work ZFS of > > course. >

Joerg Schilling wrote: > Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling >> <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: >> > > >> > If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective work" and the GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend

...the original message contents are lost. > > Should dovecot-lda returns an error in such conditions ( invalid contents ) ? Qmail will keep it in the queue and retry delivery later. That's the problem of the used Unix pipe and broken by design. The right member of the pipe (preline) runs independendly of dspam and recieves no content via pipe. Why should preline or dovecot-lda believe there is an error? If preline does not have no nifty option to prevent this, replace the pipe by a shell script: | /usr/local/bin/dspam-lda-wrapper.sh "$EXT@$USER" "$EXT2" ===== /usr/local...

You have to setup a fallback type of setup. You have a /live a /stream to handle this in a simple way. I think this is because your trying to stream and encode to the same /mountpoint I would even have a totally independendent of each other setup /dj01 /dj02 /dj03 /dj04 /live /stream I can help you if needed... Scott Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Hallo, Vielen Dank f?r deine/Ihre