search for: indemnif

...GPLv2 (is it incompatible with other licenses?) This is interesting, I did not know that... http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html "Despite our best efforts, the FSF has never considered the Apache License to be compatible with GPL version 2, citing the patent termination and indemnification provisions as restrictions not present in the older GPL license." It seems to be compatible with GPLv3, though. But I think most companies that use LLVM are stuck with GPLv2 due to the patents issue. cheers, --renato

This evening I posted a new set of Digium G.729 codec modules to our FTP server and web site, for Linux x86 and x86-64 processors. They were built using GCC 4.0.1, and they now report the processor they were optimized for when they are loaded. The previous x86-64 module required a non-standard Asterisk binary configuration, so this was corrected. In addition, there was only a generic version

Hi Has anyone opened up a grandstream phone or handytone ATA to find out what is inside? What is the CPU? How much RAM? Cheers Rob

...s is interesting, I did not know that... >> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html >> >> "Despite our best efforts, the FSF has never considered the Apache >> License to be compatible with GPL version 2, citing the patent >> termination and indemnification provisions as restrictions not present >> in the older GPL license." > > :-( > > This means that for example using llvm for jitting stuff in a gpl2 > program is out. No it isn't. It means you can't grab the combined memory image out of memory and ship that...

I've heard good things about VoipJet here, so I was going to set up an account. Then I noticed their Terms of Service here: https://www.voipjet.com/tos.php Several things there are very concerning to me, and I'm interested in what other people here think of them. * The ToS specifically forbids use for any call relating to medical, financial, or government matters -- as well as any

From: Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> > Referencing SL3 and CentOS 3 (as I haven't run SL4 as yet) there were some > scientific applications and some Java stuff, eclipse for one, You do understand the redistribution issues with Java, correct? It's a Sun problem (a typical thorn for Red Hat in general), not a Red Hat one. > part of cluster suite for another, included. >

I''m getting a VFS kernel panic when trying to booting to FC3 from Xen. Its the one that says I must supply a valid "root=" option. (sorry I don''t have it verbatim.) I''m using the xen-2.0 binary installer, kernel 2.6.9. I am using ext3fs, but I am fairly certain that I have compiled support into the kernel. (I''ve tired compile xen from the 2.0

"Does raidzN actually protect against bitrot?" That''s a kind of radical, possibly offensive, question formula that I have lately. Reading up on theory of RAID5, I grasped the idea of the write hole (where one of the sectors of the stripe, such as the parity data, doesn''t get written - leading to invalid data upon read). In general, I think the same applies to bitrot of

Hi Everyone, I’d like to start a discussion about how to improve some important issues we have in the LLVM community, regarding our license and patent policy. Before we get started, I’d like to emphasize that *this is an RFC*, intended for discussion. There is no time pressure to do something fast here -- we want to do the right long-term thing for the community (though we also don’t want