Displaying 20 results from an estimated 97 matches for "incubators".
Did you mean:
incubator
2012 Nov 24
3
Help!!!!!
Dear R users.
I am little lost and i need your help.
I have such data.
DATE i Symptomes t
1 2009-04-24 Mexique 0 14358
2 2009-04-24 usa 0 14358
3 2009-04-26 Mexique 18 14360
4 2009-04-26 usa 100 14360
5 2009-04-27 Canada 6 14361
6 2009-04-27
2008 Aug 21
3
mean for vector with NA
I am trying to find the mean for the elements in the vector
Incubation=as.POSIXlt(OnsetTime)-as.POSIXlt(MealTime)
where
OnsetTime=c(NA,"1940-04-19 00:30","1940-04-19 00:30","1940-04-19
00:30",NA,"1940-04-18 22:30","1940-04-18 22:30","1940-04-19
02:00","1940-04-19 01:00","1940-04-18
2020 Jun 24
3
[Incubation] Request to incubate mlir-npcomp
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 9:54 AM Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:40 PM Stella Laurenzo via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > We originally started it as a fork of the LLVM repository, but
> transitioned to the MLIR standalone template, and we found it more
> productive to iterate out of tree in this fashion,
2020 Jul 01
6
LLVM Incubator + new projects draft
...A couple of nit picks, none are blockers.
1. I'd hold off on handing out the sub-domain for the moment. This
feels more official than we probably want for a random incubator. I
reserve the right to change my mind here, but maybe we should delay
this part until we see what actual incubators look like? As an
alternative, maybe have a common incubator.llvm.org page which links
to the docs defining the process and lists all active incubators
with links to docs in their own repo?
2. The must/should terminology should probably be factored out once and
referenced. As writ...
2020 Jun 23
8
[Incubation] Request to incubate mlir-npcomp
Per the recent (seeming) consensus regarding incubating new projects under
the LLVM organization, I would like to trial the process by requesting to
incubate mlir-npcomp <https://github.com/google/mlir-npcomp>. The project
is still quite young and has been primarily developed part time by myself
and Sean Silva over the last ~2 months. We set it up following discussion
of a Numpy/Scipy op set
2020 Jul 02
3
LLVM Incubator + new projects draft
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 11:12 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure I agree with the no-code standard. I agree with minimal code, but I think an incubator should be established enough to be discussed concretely (e.g. "what is" vs "ideals").
>
> I hear what you’re saying, but I think we can handle this as part of
2007 Nov 01
2
F distribution from lme()?
Dear all,
Using the data set and code below, I am interested in modelling how egg
temperature (egg.temp)
is related to energy expenditure (kjday) and clutch size (treat) in
incubating birds using the
lme-function. I wish to generate the F-distribution for my model, and have
tried to do so using
the anova()-function. However, in the resulting anova-table, the parameter
kjday has gone from
being
2020 Jun 30
2
[Incubation] Request to incubate mlir-npcomp
> On Jun 24, 2020, at 9:53 AM, Nicolai Hähnle via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:40 PM Stella Laurenzo via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> We originally started it as a fork of the LLVM repository, but transitioned to the MLIR standalone template, and we found it more productive to iterate out of tree in
2020 Jul 04
9
Proposal for CIRCT incubator project
For the past several months, members of the ‘CIRCT’ group have been working
to begin adapting MLIR for hardware design. We believe that this area
would benefit from good open source infrastructure enabling research and,
eventually, the next generation of commercial tools. We have collected
several dialects and envision a number of lowering flows using these
dialects. We have reached the point
2020 Jun 20
17
[RFC] Introduce an LLVM "Incubator" Process
Hi all,
Today, we maintain a high bar for getting a new subproject into LLVM: first a subproject has to be built far enough along to “prove its worth” to be part of the LLVM monorepo (e.g. demonstrate community, etc). Once conceptually approved, it needs to follow all of the policies and practices expected by an LLVM subproject.
This is problematic for a couple reasons: it implicitly means that
2020 Jun 30
2
LLVM Incubator + new projects draft
Hah, whoops, sorry about that. This is the correct link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ss4jGHywL0Y2KW_l4LqTo5CgJxx3i0_4-FkbXiPQMus/edit <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ss4jGHywL0Y2KW_l4LqTo5CgJxx3i0_4-FkbXiPQMus/edit>
-Chris
> On Jun 30, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Thomas Lively <tlively at google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I'm also seeing an access denied
2020 Jun 30
4
LLVM Incubator + new projects draft
The idea of adding an “incubation” stage to projects in the LLVM world seems to be positively received. I also noticed that we don’t really document the new project policy in general in the LLVM Developer Policy. To help with both of these Stella and I worked together to draft up a new section for the LLVM developer policy (incorporating the existing “New Targets” section).
Ahead of proposing a
2020 Jul 01
4
RFC: Adding a staging branch (temporarily) to facilitate upstreaming
On 6/30/20 2:07 PM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 30, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Duncan Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com
>> <mailto:dexonsmith at apple.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 2020-Jun-30, at 13:28, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev
>>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
2020 Jul 08
2
[RFC] Proposal for CIRCT incubator project
Sure, I'll summarize with respect to the criterion in the document:
- Must be generally aligned with the mission of the LLVM project to
advance compilers, languages, tools, runtimes, etc.
CIRCT is a compiler which is built around LLVM/MLIR. We anticipate
building code generation for ASIC and FPGA backends along with specialized
accelerators, while leveraging existing LLVM backends for
2012 Dec 04
6
Help for a function
Hello all,
I need a help.
I am modeling a disease and a create a R function like that:
Lambda<-function (x,date1,r,h,a){
ndate1 <- as.Date(date1, "%d/%m/%Y")
t1 <- as.numeric(ndate1)
x[order(x$i),]
t <-x[,"t"]
i <-x[,"i"]
CONTAGIEUX <-x[,"CONTAGIEUX"]
while ( t1 < min(t) ){
for (i in 1:length(i) ){
{for (j in
2008 Jun 25
1
data frame manipulation - splitting monitoring interval and assigning stage
Hello, everyone.
I'm hoping to prevent myself from doing a lot of pointing and clicking
in Excel. I have a dataframe of bird nest check observations, in which
I know the date of the first check, the date of the second check (both
currently in Julian date format), the status of the nest at the second
check (alive or failed), and the date that the nest hatched (i.e.
changed from Incubation
2019 Aug 30
1
Sieve Header question.
I'm trying to make my github processing better, but I'm missing something.
I have the following:
if address :all :contains "from" ["github.com"] {
addflag "github";
addflag "MyFlags" "github";
set "mailbox" "GitHub";
if address :matches :user "to" "*" {
set "GHUser"
2013 Feb 08
0
[Vote] Formal vote for Mirage to be accepted as Xen.org Incubation Project (deadliner Feb 15th)
Hi everybody,
after the initial positive community review of the
http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Mirage_Incubation_Project_Proposal, it is time
to have a formal vote.
Who can vote?
- Project leads of Mature Xen.org projects
- Committers of Mature Xen.org projects
- Others can register their vote in support of the project, but the vote
is not binding.
How to vote?
- Vote via the voting form at
2013 Jan 11
2
[Community Review] Mirage Incubation Project Proposal
Hi everybody,
this e-mail is to let you know that the OpenMirage project is seeking to
become a
Xen.org hosted project.
The prospective project lead of the Mirage Project - Anil Madhavapeddy -
has requested
a Review of the Mirage Project to become an Xen.org Incubation project.
In line with
Xen Project Governance (see
http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html), in particular
sections
-
2020 Jul 08
2
Proposal for CIRCT incubator project
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:52 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> It would be nice to have an external MLIR user in the project, and
> this project seems really well organised and relevant. +1 from me,
> too.
I think that flang beat us to the punch as the first external MLIR user :-) but thank you for your support Renato!
-Chris
>
> On