search for: incubation

...2009-04-29 SPAIN 4 14363 23 2009-04-29 United Kingdom 5 14363 A data with a date in character format,i wich reprent a country,Symptomes wich is a number of subjects having a disease,t the date convert in numeric. I want to create two other variables (for example INCUBATION and CONTAGIEUX) Incubation[ i ] add values for symptomes for the two previous days (for t<=t-1) CONTAGIEUX [ i ] add values for symptomes for the 7 next days (for t>=t+6). I want the two variables INCUBATION and CONTAGIEUX to be cumulative for next and previous date. For example for date...

I am trying to find the mean for the elements in the vector Incubation=as.POSIXlt(OnsetTime)-as.POSIXlt(MealTime) where OnsetTime=c(NA,"1940-04-19 00:30","1940-04-19 00:30","1940-04-19 00:30",NA,"1940-04-18 22:30","1940-04-18 22:30","1940-04-19 02:00","1940-04-19 01:00","1940-04-18 23:00&...

...;right" LLVM version? As > somebody who spends a significant amount of time on a project that is > open-source but out-of-tree -- and for good reasons that mean we're > unlikely to want to incubate in this fashion -- I find this to be a > major problem. > > If the goal of incubation is to eventually become part of the > llvm-project monorepo, I feel that being inside the monorepo should be > a goal early on. Actually that would be a big problem in practice, because it means that either: 1. random changes in the monorepo can put the incubator into an unbuildable state 2...

...>> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:44 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev >>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The idea of adding an “incubation” stage to projects in the >>>> LLVM world seems to be positively received.  I also noticed >>>> that we don’t really document the new project policy in >>>> general in the LLVM Developer Policy.  To help with both of >>>>...

Per the recent (seeming) consensus regarding incubating new projects under the LLVM organization, I would like to trial the process by requesting to incubate mlir-npcomp <https://github.com/google/mlir-npcomp>. The project is still quite young and has been primarily developed part time by myself and Sean Silva over the last ~2 months. We set it up following discussion of a Numpy/Scipy op set

...e can handle this as part of the process" feels like a cop-out to me. Part of the point of writing up a document like this is to establish and document expectations, and this is an important expectation to establish. To clarify, the key underlying issue here is that there is no reason to make incubation a free-for-all (people can always create repos on GitHub), but if it's not a free-for-all, then a decision must be made somehow. The question is: what grounds is that decision going to be made on? The fewer concrete artefacts we have to make a decision, the more people will form their opinions...

Dear all, Using the data set and code below, I am interested in modelling how egg temperature (egg.temp) is related to energy expenditure (kjday) and clutch size (treat) in incubating birds using the lme-function. I wish to generate the F-distribution for my model, and have tried to do so using the anova()-function. However, in the resulting anova-table, the parameter kjday has gone from being

> On Jun 24, 2020, at 9:53 AM, Nicolai Hähnle via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:40 PM Stella Laurenzo via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> We originally started it as a fork of the LLVM repository, but transitioned to the MLIR standalone template, and we found it more productive to iterate out of tree in

For the past several months, members of the ‘CIRCT’ group have been working to begin adapting MLIR for hardware design. We believe that this area would benefit from good open source infrastructure enabling research and, eventually, the next generation of commercial tools. We have collected several dialects and envision a number of lowering flows using these dialects. We have reached the point

Hi all, Today, we maintain a high bar for getting a new subproject into LLVM: first a subproject has to be built far enough along to “prove its worth” to be part of the LLVM monorepo (e.g. demonstrate community, etc). Once conceptually approved, it needs to follow all of the policies and practices expected by an LLVM subproject. This is problematic for a couple reasons: it implicitly means that

...<lebedev.ri at gmail.com <mailto:lebedev.ri at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:44 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>> The idea of adding an “incubation” stage to projects in the LLVM world seems to be positively received. I also noticed that we don’t really document the new project policy in general in the LLVM Developer Policy. To help with both of these Stella and I worked together to draft up a new section for the LLVM developer policy (incor...

The idea of adding an “incubation” stage to projects in the LLVM world seems to be positively received. I also noticed that we don’t really document the new project policy in general in the LLVM Developer Policy. To help with both of these Stella and I worked together to draft up a new section for the LLVM developer policy (incor...

On 6/30/20 2:07 PM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > > >> On Jun 30, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Duncan Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com >> <mailto:dexonsmith at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 2020-Jun-30, at 13:28, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev >>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:

...ct>. I think this is very feasible from the perspective of code structure, but I would want to get to the point where we have stable APIs and useful end-to-end toolflows before advocating for that. - Should include a notice (e.g. in the project README or web page) that the project is in ‘incubation status’ and is not included in LLVM releases (see suggested wording below). We can easily add this if accepted by the community. - Must be proposed through the LLVM RFC process, and have its addition approved by the LLVM community - this ultimately mediates the resolution of the “shou...

...,"CONTAGIEUX"] while ( t1 < min(t) ){ for (i in 1:length(i) ){ {for (j in 1:CONTAGIEUX[length(CONTAGIEUX)]){ res1[j] <-(a*h) res2 <-sum( res1[j]) } } lambda[i] <- r*res2 } } x<-data.frame(x,lambda) x } on such data : DATE i Symptomes t Incubation CONTAGIEUX 1 2009-04-29 Canada 13 14363 13 13 2 2009-05-01 Israel 2 14365 2 2 3 2009-05-09 argentina 1 14373 1 1 5 2009-05-09 australia 1 14373 1 1 6 2009-05-10 australia 1 14374 2 2 7 2009-04-29 Austria 1 14363 1 1 8 2009-04-30 Austria 1 14364 2 2 9 2009-05-01 Austria 1 14365 2 3 10 2009-05...

...licking in Excel. I have a dataframe of bird nest check observations, in which I know the date of the first check, the date of the second check (both currently in Julian date format), the status of the nest at the second check (alive or failed), and the date that the nest hatched (i.e. changed from Incubation stages to Brood-rearing stage). Many nests have more than one record, as there were several nest checks throughout the duration of the nesting attempt. What I want to do is assign a nest Stage variable, either Incubation or Brood-rearing. It's very easy to do so when the second nest check was...

I'm trying to make my github processing better, but I'm missing something. I have the following: if address :all :contains "from" ["github.com"] { addflag "github"; addflag "MyFlags" "github"; set "mailbox" "GitHub"; if address :matches :user "to" "*" { set "GHUser"

Hi everybody, after the initial positive community review of the http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Mirage_Incubation_Project_Proposal, it is time to have a formal vote. Who can vote? - Project leads of Mature Xen.org projects - Committers of Mature Xen.org projects - Others can register their vote in support of the project, but the vote is not binding. How to vote? - Vote via the voting form at http://xen.or...

Hi everybody, this e-mail is to let you know that the OpenMirage project is seeking to become a Xen.org hosted project. The prospective project lead of the Mirage Project - Anil Madhavapeddy - has requested a Review of the Mirage Project to become an Xen.org Incubation project. In line with Xen Project Governance (see http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html), in particular sections - "Forming a Project" at http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html#project.forming - "Project Proposal" at http://www.xen.org/projects/governance....

> On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:52 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > It would be nice to have an external MLIR user in the project, and > this project seems really well organised and relevant. +1 from me, > too. I think that flang beat us to the punch as the first external MLIR user :-) but thank you for your support Renato! -Chris > > On