search for: incubated

Dear R users. I am little lost and i need your help. I have such data. DATE i Symptomes t 1 2009-04-24 Mexique 0 14358 2 2009-04-24 usa 0 14358 3 2009-04-26 Mexique 18 14360 4 2009-04-26 usa 100 14360 5 2009-04-27 Canada 6 14361 6 2009-04-27

I am trying to find the mean for the elements in the vector Incubation=as.POSIXlt(OnsetTime)-as.POSIXlt(MealTime) where OnsetTime=c(NA,"1940-04-19 00:30","1940-04-19 00:30","1940-04-19 00:30",NA,"1940-04-18 22:30","1940-04-18 22:30","1940-04-19 02:00","1940-04-19 01:00","1940-04-18

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 9:54 AM Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:40 PM Stella Laurenzo via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > We originally started it as a fork of the LLVM repository, but > transitioned to the MLIR standalone template, and we found it more > productive to iterate out of tree in this fashion,

This looks to be a reasonable starting point. A couple of nit picks, none are blockers. 1. I'd hold off on handing out the sub-domain for the moment. This feels more official than we probably want for a random incubator.  I reserve the right to change my mind here, but maybe we should delay this part until we see what actual incubators look like?  As an alternative, maybe

Per the recent (seeming) consensus regarding incubating new projects under the LLVM organization, I would like to trial the process by requesting to incubate mlir-npcomp <https://github.com/google/mlir-npcomp>. The project is still quite young and has been primarily developed part time by myself and Sean Silva over the last ~2 months. We set it up following discussion of a Numpy/Scipy op set

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 11:12 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm not sure I agree with the no-code standard. I agree with minimal code, but I think an incubator should be established enough to be discussed concretely (e.g. "what is" vs "ideals"). > > I hear what you’re saying, but I think we can handle this as part of

Dear all, Using the data set and code below, I am interested in modelling how egg temperature (egg.temp) is related to energy expenditure (kjday) and clutch size (treat) in incubating birds using the lme-function. I wish to generate the F-distribution for my model, and have tried to do so using the anova()-function. However, in the resulting anova-table, the parameter kjday has gone from being

> On Jun 24, 2020, at 9:53 AM, Nicolai Hähnle via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:40 PM Stella Laurenzo via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> We originally started it as a fork of the LLVM repository, but transitioned to the MLIR standalone template, and we found it more productive to iterate out of tree in

For the past several months, members of the ‘CIRCT’ group have been working to begin adapting MLIR for hardware design. We believe that this area would benefit from good open source infrastructure enabling research and, eventually, the next generation of commercial tools. We have collected several dialects and envision a number of lowering flows using these dialects. We have reached the point

Hi all, Today, we maintain a high bar for getting a new subproject into LLVM: first a subproject has to be built far enough along to “prove its worth” to be part of the LLVM monorepo (e.g. demonstrate community, etc). Once conceptually approved, it needs to follow all of the policies and practices expected by an LLVM subproject. This is problematic for a couple reasons: it implicitly means that

Hah, whoops, sorry about that. This is the correct link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ss4jGHywL0Y2KW_l4LqTo5CgJxx3i0_4-FkbXiPQMus/edit <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ss4jGHywL0Y2KW_l4LqTo5CgJxx3i0_4-FkbXiPQMus/edit> -Chris > On Jun 30, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Thomas Lively <tlively at google.com> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > I'm also seeing an access denied

The idea of adding an “incubation” stage to projects in the LLVM world seems to be positively received. I also noticed that we don’t really document the new project policy in general in the LLVM Developer Policy. To help with both of these Stella and I worked together to draft up a new section for the LLVM developer policy (incorporating the existing “New Targets” section). Ahead of proposing a

On 6/30/20 2:07 PM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > > >> On Jun 30, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Duncan Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com >> <mailto:dexonsmith at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 2020-Jun-30, at 13:28, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev >>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:

Sure, I'll summarize with respect to the criterion in the document: - Must be generally aligned with the mission of the LLVM project to advance compilers, languages, tools, runtimes, etc. CIRCT is a compiler which is built around LLVM/MLIR. We anticipate building code generation for ASIC and FPGA backends along with specialized accelerators, while leveraging existing LLVM backends for

Hello all, I need a help. I am modeling a disease and a create a R function like that: Lambda<-function (x,date1,r,h,a){ ndate1 <- as.Date(date1, "%d/%m/%Y") t1 <- as.numeric(ndate1) x[order(x$i),] t <-x[,"t"] i <-x[,"i"] CONTAGIEUX <-x[,"CONTAGIEUX"] while ( t1 < min(t) ){ for (i in 1:length(i) ){ {for (j in

Hello, everyone. I'm hoping to prevent myself from doing a lot of pointing and clicking in Excel. I have a dataframe of bird nest check observations, in which I know the date of the first check, the date of the second check (both currently in Julian date format), the status of the nest at the second check (alive or failed), and the date that the nest hatched (i.e. changed from Incubation

I'm trying to make my github processing better, but I'm missing something. I have the following: if address :all :contains "from" ["github.com"] { addflag "github"; addflag "MyFlags" "github"; set "mailbox" "GitHub"; if address :matches :user "to" "*" { set "GHUser"

Hi everybody, after the initial positive community review of the http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Mirage_Incubation_Project_Proposal, it is time to have a formal vote. Who can vote? - Project leads of Mature Xen.org projects - Committers of Mature Xen.org projects - Others can register their vote in support of the project, but the vote is not binding. How to vote? - Vote via the voting form at

Hi everybody, this e-mail is to let you know that the OpenMirage project is seeking to become a Xen.org hosted project. The prospective project lead of the Mirage Project - Anil Madhavapeddy - has requested a Review of the Mirage Project to become an Xen.org Incubation project. In line with Xen Project Governance (see http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html), in particular sections -

> On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:52 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > It would be nice to have an external MLIR user in the project, and > this project seems really well organised and relevant. +1 from me, > too. I think that flang beat us to the punch as the first external MLIR user :-) but thank you for your support Renato! -Chris > > On