search for: incub

...2009-04-29 SPAIN 4 14363 23 2009-04-29 United Kingdom 5 14363 A data with a date in character format,i wich reprent a country,Symptomes wich is a number of subjects having a disease,t the date convert in numeric. I want to create two other variables (for example INCUBATION and CONTAGIEUX) Incubation[ i ] add values for symptomes for the two previous days (for t<=t-1) CONTAGIEUX [ i ] add values for symptomes for the 7 next days (for t>=t+6). I want the two variables INCUBATION and CONTAGIEUX to be cumulative for next and previous date. For example for...

I am trying to find the mean for the elements in the vector Incubation=as.POSIXlt(OnsetTime)-as.POSIXlt(MealTime) where OnsetTime=c(NA,"1940-04-19 00:30","1940-04-19 00:30","1940-04-19 00:30",NA,"1940-04-18 22:30","1940-04-18 22:30","1940-04-19 02:00","1940-04-19 01:00","1940-04-18 2...

...do it, the better it becomes). > > How do you deal with the problem of using the "right" LLVM version? As > somebody who spends a significant amount of time on a project that is > open-source but out-of-tree -- and for good reasons that mean we're > unlikely to want to incubate in this fashion -- I find this to be a > major problem. > > If the goal of incubation is to eventually become part of the > llvm-project monorepo, I feel that being inside the monorepo should be > a goal early on. Actually that would be a big problem in practice, because it mean...

This looks to be a reasonable starting point. A couple of nit picks, none are blockers. 1. I'd hold off on handing out the sub-domain for the moment. This feels more official than we probably want for a random incubator.  I reserve the right to change my mind here, but maybe we should delay this part until we see what actual incubators look like?  As an alternative, maybe have a common incubator.llvm.org page which links to the docs defining the process and lists all active incubators with...

Per the recent (seeming) consensus regarding incubating new projects under the LLVM organization, I would like to trial the process by requesting to incubate mlir-npcomp <https://github.com/google/mlir-npcomp>. The project is still quite young and has been primarily developed part time by myself and Sean Silva over the last ~2 months. We set...

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 11:12 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm not sure I agree with the no-code standard. I agree with minimal code, but I think an incubator should be established enough to be discussed concretely (e.g. "what is" vs "ideals"). > > I hear what you’re saying, but I think we can handle this as part of the approval process. We can bounce of things that qualitatively don’t feel credible and give guidance there,...

Dear all, Using the data set and code below, I am interested in modelling how egg temperature (egg.temp) is related to energy expenditure (kjday) and clutch size (treat) in incubating birds using the lme-function. I wish to generate the F-distribution for my model, and have tried to do so using the anova()-function. However, in the resulting anova-table, the parameter kjday has gone from being highly non-signiicant in the lme-expression, to all of a sudden being significant...

...do it, the better it becomes). > > How do you deal with the problem of using the "right" LLVM version? As > somebody who spends a significant amount of time on a project that is > open-source but out-of-tree -- and for good reasons that mean we're > unlikely to want to incubate in this fashion -- I find this to be a > major problem. I’m contributing to an external project based on MLIR (which should become public soon). That project is using the LLVM monorepo as a git submodule, allowing us to update it and track at project-specific times. It seems to work well....

...cture enabling research and, eventually, the next generation of commercial tools. We have collected several dialects and envision a number of lowering flows using these dialects. We have reached the point where we are ready to share our ideas more widely and would like to be considered as an LLVM incubator project. Our code exists at https://github.com/circt as an out-of-tree MLIR project and our group charter can be found at https://github.com/circt/circt/blob/master/README.md. We have weekly discussions with a group of about 20 people from Xilinx, SiFive, Microsoft, PNNL, ETH Zurich, EPFL, St...

...critical mass with the “wrong” approach, it is very difficult and expensive to convert to the LLVM style, and from a social perspective, inertia sometimes leads to forking off to separate projects instead of folding back in to LLVM. A former colleague recently suggested the idea of introducing an incubator process of some sort (e.g. xref the Apache version of this idea <https://incubator.apache.org/>). I think this is a really interesting idea, and it is much easier now that the majority of the “official” code is in the LLVM monorepo. Here is a sketch of how this could work: - We mainta...

...<lebedev.ri at gmail.com <mailto:lebedev.ri at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:44 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>> The idea of adding an “incubation” stage to projects in the LLVM world seems to be positively received. I also noticed that we don’t really document the new project policy in general in the LLVM Developer Policy. To help with both of these Stella and I worked together to draft up a new section for the LLVM developer policy (...

The idea of adding an “incubation” stage to projects in the LLVM world seems to be positively received. I also noticed that we don’t really document the new project policy in general in the LLVM Developer Policy. To help with both of these Stella and I worked together to draft up a new section for the LLVM developer policy (...

...aging approach, but am not opposed to an in tree branch either.  The main argument I see for the separate repo is that the bar can be lower because the consequences for being "wrong" about the code being fully merged quickly are lower. Or another thought, maybe we should even use the incubator flow here?  Nothing says an incubator has to be long lived.  If we spun up an "incubator-staging-apple" repo, wouldn't that demonstrate the same benefits? Philip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermai...

...ct>. I think this is very feasible from the perspective of code structure, but I would want to get to the point where we have stable APIs and useful end-to-end toolflows before advocating for that. - Should include a notice (e.g. in the project README or web page) that the project is in ‘incubation status’ and is not included in LLVM releases (see suggested wording below). We can easily add this if accepted by the community. - Must be proposed through the LLVM RFC process, and have its addition approved by the LLVM community - this ultimately mediates the resolution of the...

...,"CONTAGIEUX"] while ( t1 < min(t) ){ for (i in 1:length(i) ){ {for (j in 1:CONTAGIEUX[length(CONTAGIEUX)]){ res1[j] <-(a*h) res2 <-sum( res1[j]) } } lambda[i] <- r*res2 } } x<-data.frame(x,lambda) x } on such data : DATE i Symptomes t Incubation CONTAGIEUX 1 2009-04-29 Canada 13 14363 13 13 2 2009-05-01 Israel 2 14365 2 2 3 2009-05-09 argentina 1 14373 1 1 5 2009-05-09 australia 1 14373 1 1 6 2009-05-10 australia 1 14374 2 2 7 2009-04-29 Austria 1 14363 1 1 8 2009-04-30 Austria 1 14364 2 2 9 2009-05-01 Austria 1 14365 2 3 10 20...

...licking in Excel. I have a dataframe of bird nest check observations, in which I know the date of the first check, the date of the second check (both currently in Julian date format), the status of the nest at the second check (alive or failed), and the date that the nest hatched (i.e. changed from Incubation stages to Brood-rearing stage). Many nests have more than one record, as there were several nest checks throughout the duration of the nesting attempt. What I want to do is assign a nest Stage variable, either Incubation or Brood-rearing. It's very easy to do so when the second nest check...

...s" "${GHuser}"; } if header :matches "List-ID" "(.*/.*) <(.*)>" { set "mailbox" "github-lists/${1}"; } fileinto :flags "${MyFlags}" :create "${mailbox}"; stop; } I'm trying to match the apache-incubator-superset part of: List-ID: apache/incubator-superset <incubator-superset.apache.github.com> What am I missing? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Dr, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106...

Hi everybody, after the initial positive community review of the http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Mirage_Incubation_Project_Proposal, it is time to have a formal vote. Who can vote? - Project leads of Mature Xen.org projects - Committers of Mature Xen.org projects - Others can register their vote in support of the project, but the vote is not binding. How to vote? - Vote via the voting form at http://x...

Hi everybody, this e-mail is to let you know that the OpenMirage project is seeking to become a Xen.org hosted project. The prospective project lead of the Mirage Project - Anil Madhavapeddy - has requested a Review of the Mirage Project to become an Xen.org Incubation project. In line with Xen Project Governance (see http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html), in particular sections - "Forming a Project" at http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html#project.forming - "Project Proposal" at http://www.xen.org/projects/govern...

...cture enabling research and, eventually, the next generation of commercial tools. We have collected several dialects and envision a number of lowering flows using these dialects. We have reached the point where we are ready to share our ideas more widely and would like to be considered as an LLVM incubator project. >> Our code exists at https://github.com/circt as an out-of-tree MLIR project and our group charter can be found at https://github.com/circt/circt/blob/master/README.md. We have weekly discussions with a group of about 20 people from Xilinx, SiFive, Microsoft, PNNL, ETH Zurich,...