search for: incrementer

I was testing ocfs2 on a 2 node cluster set up. ocfs2-tools version is 1.6.3 ocfs2 kernel version is 2.6.36 Using cman on 2 nodes node02 dw # ping_pong -rwm /data/test.dat 3 data increment = 2 14 locks/sec node01 dw # ping_pong -rw /data/test.dat 3 data increment = 2 10 locks/sec node02 dw # ping_pong -r /data/test.dat 3 1980 locks/sec Using cman on 1 node node02 dw #

On 11/9/2015 9:50 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > I don't see the distinction you're making. a incremental backup copies everything since the last incremental a differential copies everything since the last full. rsync is NOT a backup system, its just a incremental file copy with the full/incremental/differential approach, a restore to a given date would need to restore the last

Hi Hal, Our Architecture has indirect move instruction which increments the pointer implicitly and the target only has i8 type values. So the load of i16 will be converted to two i8 target loads wherein after the first load instruction, the pointer to the first i8 address will automatically increment to point to the next i8 value. So the post increment nature is in the Target. A normal

I try to track down an error that causes that Astcc just reports the time, but not the costs. I could narrow the problem down into this sub routine: sub calccost() { my ($adjconn, $adjcost, $answeredtime, $increment) = @_; eval { my $adjtime = int(($answeredtime + $increment - 1) / $increment) * $increment }; my $cost; print STDERR "Adjusted time is $adjtime, cost is $adjcost with

Hi all, I have the following situation: Backup /mysource to /backupdir, /backupdir/full ---------an old full backup /backupdir/back2 -------previous increment backup(based on the full backup mentioned above) /backupdir/back1 ------most recent increment backup (based on the two backups mentioned above) How can I merge the two increment backups into one directory,say

The method is here: https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/activerecord/lib/active_record/persistence.rb#L288. The method takes the in-memory attribute value and increments it by the specified amount. A safer approach (from an isolation standpoint) would be to let the database determine the value. Instead of telling the database what value to persist in the database, the SQL can written

Hi Hal, On Tuesday 01 October 2013 06:22 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> Hi Hal, >> >> >> Our Architecture has indirect move instruction which increments >> the >> pointer implicitly and the target only has i8 type values. So the >> load >> of i16 will be converted to two i8 target loads wherein after the

for example's sake: With traditional backup systems, you keep a base (full backup, let's say every 30 days), then build incrementals on top of that, eg. (what has changed since the base). So, to restore, you copy over your base, then copy each incremental over the base to rebuild up to the latest snapshot. (*copying new incrementals files over older base files*) With rsync, (using

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sergei Larin" <slarin at codeaurora.org> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Friday, March 1, 2013 10:24:39 AM > Subject: Interesting post increment situation in DAG combiner > > Hal, (and everyone who might care about post increment generation)... Sergei, Perhaps

Hal, Here is my patch for the post inc case. I think it is symmetrically applicable to the pre-inc, but I have not tested it for that. I think you can clearly see my intent here - I simply select the "latest" candidate when multiple are available. Who else might be interested in this? Sergei --- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The

----- Original Message ----- > Hi Hal, > > > Our Architecture has indirect move instruction which increments > the > pointer implicitly and the target only has i8 type values. So the > load > of i16 will be converted to two i8 target loads wherein after the > first > load instruction, the pointer to the first i8 address will > automatically >

Hi, We have an architecture where the indirect move instruction implicitly increments the pointer value after the move. We have Instruction format and pattern for this type of instructions. How to encode the information that the pointer is incremented? Thanks and regards, Shashidhar

I'm relatively new to LLVM so apologies in advance if this is a dumb question. I've been experimenting with re-targeting LLVM onto a 16-bit micro which has pre and post increment and decrement addressing modes. I've been using llvm-gcc to generate llvm bitcode and llvm 2.7 to go from here to my target assembly code. I've got the Combine pass to deal with

Hal, (and everyone who might care about post increment generation)... I have an interesting question/observation. Consider this vector loop. void vec_add_const(unsigned N, short __attribute__ ((aligned (16))) *A, short __attribute__ ((aligned (16))) val) { unsigned i,j; for (i=0; i<N; i++) { for (j=0; j<N; j++) { A[i*N+j] += val; } } } The

I have a rudimentary implementation for load and store instructions, where the memory address operand is automatically post-incremented when the load or store instruction is issued. However, this is currently coded using custom lowering, and explicit pattern matching in the 'ISelDAGtoDAG' implementation. But it seems to me that I ought to be able to achieve this exclusively using

So I thought I'd get a head start for next week - I have a low-power Linux box that has a few samba shares mounted, and limited hard disk space. This box is connected to a tape library via SCSI card. I want to find the best way to create a full, then incremental backup of the samba mounts, directly to tape. Some of the samba mounts are appliances that cannot run any special

I am trying to assign increasing trip numbers to a binary variable ("land"; 1=home and 0=away) where a string of 1's shouldn't increment the trip_no more than once. For example; based on land<-c(0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0) the "trip_no" sequence produced should be 1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3 This is as far as I can get but Im stumped. In addition I

----- Original Message ----- > Hi, > > We have an architecture where the indirect move instruction > implicitly increments the pointer > value after the move. We have Instruction format and pattern for this > type of instructions. > > How to encode the information that the pointer is incremented? As you seem to be aware, LLVM has patterns specifically to match

Hi all, Thanks for the incredibly quick help with the "%in%"... There's a second question, though: I'd like to increment an element of a vector if a certain event occurs, e.g. count[event] <- count[event] + 1; # works, but... Is this efficient? I wonder whether R needs to subset the count vector on both sides of the assignment operator (i.e., twice), or

Hi, Well, I need the procedure or how to do a full backup of archives to a directory. Then, do incremental backups in different directories. For example: source-dir to dest-dir a full backup. incremental of sources-dir and differential of backup-dir in `date +%m%h%y` Then, i should have a full backup in the dest-dir and incremental+diferential backup in every $DATE directory. Any ideas? I try