search for: incrementel

...Moy wrote: > Incremental development is probably promoted by DVCS far more than > others. Your comment seems to imply that only the tip of each push is > important. In the Git world, it usually isn't. Pushing a 100K patch is a 100K patch, whether it is done in one chunk or 100 smaller incrementell patches. Just because review for the former as a single chunk is a bit more complicated doesn't mean that reviewing the latter is attractive. Let's face it -- noone likes to review that much code in one go. There is also nothing stopping you from building smaller incrementell patches with...

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > I really do appreciate distributed VCS, but only as staging. > Incremental development is crucial for the project and "take this git > push with 100K of code" will never be acceptable. Incremental development is probably promoted by DVCS far more than others. Your comment seems to imply that only the tip of each push is

On Jul 22, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Bob Wilson wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2011, at 3:33 PM, fly language wrote: > >> >> After git, mainline will still be the most important branch for the *project*, >> but you will work with quite a few branches on parallel. >> >> >> Who's mainline? :) Be prepared to assign a super-merger, like Linus, to maintain the