Displaying 20 results from an estimated 246 matches for "incred".
Did you mean:
ncred
2019 Jul 03
3
optimisation issue in an llvm IR pass
Hi Craig,
On 03.07.19 17:33, Craig Topper wrote:
> Don't the CreateICmp calls return a Value* with an i1 type? But then
> they are added to an i8 type? Not sure that works.
I had that initially:
auto cf = IRB.CreateICmpULT(Incr, ConstantInt::get(Int8Ty, 1));
auto carry = IRB.CreateZExt(cf, Int8Ty);
Incr = IRB.CreateAdd(Incr, carry);
it makes no difference to the generated assembly
2019 Jul 03
2
optimisation issue in an llvm IR pass
Hello,
I have an optimisation issue in an llvm IR pass - the issue being that
unnecessary instructions are generated in the final assembly (with -O3).
I want to create the following assembly snippet:
mov dl,BYTE PTR [rsi+rdi*1]
add dl,0x1
adc dl,0x0
mov BYTE PTR [rsi+rdi*1],dl
however what is created is (variant #1):
mov dl,BYTE PTR [rsi+rdx*1]
add dl,0x1
cmp
2014 Nov 28
2
[LLVMdev] ScalarEvolution: Suboptimal handling of globals
Hi,
For the program below, where "incr" and "Arr" are globals
=================================
int incr;
float Arr[1000];
int foo ()
{
float x = 0;
int newInc = incr+1;
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < 1000; j += incr) {
x += (Arr[i] + Arr[j]);
}
}
return x;
}
=================================
The SCEV expression computed
2009 May 20
3
qbinom (PR#13711)
Full_Name: Wolfgang Resch
Version: R 2.8.1 GUI 1.27
OS: OS X 10.4.11
Submission from: (NULL) (137.187.89.14)
Strange behavior of qbinom:
> qbinom(0.01, 5016279, 1e-07)
[1] 0
> qbinom(0.01, 5016279, 2e-07)
[1] 16
> qbinom(0.01, 5016279, 3e-07)
[1] 16
> qbinom(0.01, 5016279, 4e-07)
[1] 16
> qbinom(0.01, 5016279, 5e-07)
[1] 0
2010 Jun 19
1
[LLVMdev] Is alloca instruction allowed within the cycle?
I am running this code in JIT on x86 (32 bit).
It crashes when 'alloca %object' instruction is within the body of the
cycle, and it finishes successfully when this instruction is in the
beginning of main (outside the cycle). Crash occurs in the middle of the
cycle after few hundreds of thousands iterations.
What is wrong? Does alloca inside the cycle forces it to allocate it on
stack
2009 Jul 17
2
Remembering a value in multiple calls of a function
Hello,
I tried this pseudo-generator style experiment (see below). The "<<-"
operator assigns to in the calling environment which would be the
environment of "getN".
Yet when the function incr is returned, isn't this environment lost?
Also the print displays GlobalEnv, yet the globalenv does not have any
mention of startgiven.
This code was inspired from and old
2020 Aug 21
1
qnbinom with small size is slow
Hi Martin,
thanks for verifying. I agree that the Cornish-Fisher seems to struggle
with the small size parameters, but I also don't have a good idea how to
replace it.
But I think fixing do_search() is possible:
I think the problem is that when searching to the left y is decremented
only if `pnbinom(y - incr, n, pr, /*l._t.*/TRUE, /*log_p*/FALSE)) < p` is
FALSE. I think the solution is
2014 Aug 31
0
[PATCH envytools] nvamemtiming: Handle target < initial case when iterating values
Otherwise some values are not tested at all.
---
nva/set_timings.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nva/set_timings.c b/nva/set_timings.c
index 6cd831c..7a8f845 100644
--- a/nva/set_timings.c
+++ b/nva/set_timings.c
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static void
iterate_values(struct nvamemtiming_conf *conf, FILE *outf, uint8_t index, enum color color)
{
uint8_t
2011 Apr 28
1
using lme4 with three nested random effects
Hi all,
I'm trying to fit models for data with three levels of nested random
effects: site/transect/plot. For example,
modelincrBS<-glmer(l.ru.ba.incr~shigo.av+pre.f.crwn.length+bark.thick.bh+Date+slope.pos.num+dens.T+dbh+leaf.area+can.pos.num+(1|site/transect/plot),
data=rws30.UL, family=gaussian, na.action=na.omit)
but I get the following error:
Error: length(f1) == length(f2) is not
2020 Oct 16
1
[PATCH v4 09/10] dma-buf-map: Add memcpy and pointer-increment interfaces
Hi Thomas.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 02:38:05PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> To do framebuffer updates, one needs memcpy from system memory and a
> pointer-increment function. Add both interfaces with documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org>
> ---
>
2004 Jun 22
1
Multiple --compare-dest args again
Hi all.
A while ago (April 15th or so) I posted a patch that allows rsync to
take multiple --compare-dest or --link-dest arguments, allowing
fetching of files not present in multiple trees. I never got any
feedback on it, though, so I'm picking it up again. :) Is there any
interest in such a patch at all?
Below is the usage example i outlined back then;
--start--
[...] Its primary usage is
2016 Oct 19
4
Bacula Restore
Hi list,
another question about bacula, but this time about restoring backups.
I've a server that I must backup every day. My plan is:
from mon to sat incrimental backup
and on sunday full backup.
When I will perform a restore I must restore from last valid full
backup and then all valid incremental backup from last backup to
specific date.
This server has aweb managed application where
2014 Aug 31
6
[PATCH envytools] nvbios: Add missing null byte to string read from file.
---
nvbios/nvbios.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nvbios/nvbios.c b/nvbios/nvbios.c
index f7aafe3..28e62ad 100644
--- a/nvbios/nvbios.c
+++ b/nvbios/nvbios.c
@@ -774,11 +774,12 @@ int set_strap_from_string(const char* strap_s)
int set_strap_from_file(const char *path)
{
FILE *strapfile = NULL;
- char tmp[21];
+ char tmp[22];
strapfile =
2014 Sep 02
3
[LLVMdev] LICM promoting memory to scalar
All,
If we can speculatively execute a load instruction, why isn’t it safe to hoist it out by promoting it to a scalar in LICM pass?
There is a comment in LICM pass that if a load/store is conditional then it is not safe because it would break the LLVM concurrency model (See commit 73bfa4a).
It has an IR test for checking this in test/Transforms/LICM/scalar-promote-memmodel.ll
However, I have
2020 Aug 10
2
qnbinom with small size is slow
Thanks Ben for verifying the issue. It is always reassuring to hear
when others can reproduce the problem.
I wrote a small patch that fixes the issue
(https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/pull/11):
diff --git a/src/nmath/qnbinom.c b/src/nmath/qnbinom.c
index b313ce56b2..d2e8d98759 100644
--- a/src/nmath/qnbinom.c
+++ b/src/nmath/qnbinom.c
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ double qnbinom(double p, double size,
2007 Aug 16
4
Linear models over large datasets
I'd like to fit linear models on very large datasets. My data frames
are about 2000000 rows x 200 columns of doubles and I am using an 64
bit build of R. I've googled about this extensively and went over the
"R Data Import/Export" guide. My primary issue is although my data
represented in ascii form is 4Gb in size (therefore much smaller
considered in binary), R consumes about
2002 Oct 04
2
spline bug ?
# Is this a bug or something I don't understand?
spline(date, stor, n=52, xmin=mind, xmax=maxd)
# gives length(x) of 53 ????, but y has the expected length of 52
# Shouldn't they be the same length? From help (spline):
# spline returns a list containing components x and y which give the
# ordinates where interpolation took place and the interpolated values
# xmin and xmax are inside
2016 Jan 27
2
NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
...lse
> dns_lookup_kdc = true
>
> Should only as I get it from a forgotten test platform where I set
> dns_lookup_realm = true
>
> Cheers,
>
> mathias
>
Hi Mathias, this is a member server not a DC.
>
> 2016-01-27 2:03 GMT+01:00 Henry McLaughlin <henry at incred.com.au>:
>
>> On 27 January 2016 at 08:24, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On 26/01/16 20:54, Henry McLaughlin wrote:
>> >
>> >> [root at centos7member ~]# net rpc rights list accounts
>> >> -U'TESTING\administ...
2020 Oct 15
0
[PATCH v4 09/10] dma-buf-map: Add memcpy and pointer-increment interfaces
To do framebuffer updates, one needs memcpy from system memory and a
pointer-increment function. Add both interfaces with documentation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
---
include/linux/dma-buf-map.h | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h b/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h
2014 Sep 02
2
[LLVMdev] LICM promoting memory to scalar
I think gcc is right.
It inserted a branch for n == 0 (the cbz at the top), so that's not a problem.
In all other regards, this is safe: if you examine the sequence of loads and stores, it eliminated all but the first load and all but the last store. How's that unsafe?
If I had to guess, the bug here is that LLVM doesn't want to hoist the load over the condition (which it is right