search for: increating

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: normal I'm not an expert in networking but I think that the current setup when using network-nat for domains is insecure. I've configured : (network-script 'network-nat netdev=eth1') (vif-script vif-nat) So when only domain 0 is started, I get the following : # iptables -L -n Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > retitle 430676 xen-utils-common: network-nat creates insecure nat POSTROUTING MASQUERADE ? Bug#430676: xen-utils-common: network-nat increates insecure nat POSTROUTING MASQUERADE ? Changed Bug title to `xen-utils-common: network-nat creates insecure nat POSTROUTING MASQUERADE ?' from `xen-utils-common: network-nat increates insecure nat

Perhaps someone will help me on this :- I have read a lot of examples of syn flood protect on the INPUT chain. That I have no question at all. I wonder if it make sense to perform syn flood protection at the FORWARD chain ? If packets are originated from a LAN worm, and are not targetted at the firewall itself, but rather at hosts in the internet, will it cause problem with the firewall itself,

Hi all. We just put a relative large server in operation (for our measures ;-) ), a 4x Dual Core / Intel with 16GB Ram and a 3ware 9550SX SATA-RAID with 4 drives. Operating system for the Dom0 is an up-to-date gentoo linux. Everything runs really fine, there are 4 Domu''s running, 1x gentoo and 2x debian and 1x Windows Server 2003. DomU''s are running blazing fast in normal

I have already 6 Centos machines here and it is getting strange having to pull down updates to each system. Seems like I should set up one system to pull updates and then all other systems to point to it. How? Plus then I would want to add to this repository. Say that a number of my systems use tomcat which is only available via rpm. I would like to be able to add it to my repository, and

Git commit c1469413f36d4e4cd9dd49e70bc5d660cf2f3c55 by Martin Gr??lin. Committed on 17/03/2013 at 12:24. Pushed by graesslin into branch 'master'. KDecorationBridge becomes private again With 4933f08ae49328e36e2654434d28917310882ee5 the KDecorationBridge interface became public to allow Compiz to easily implement the class. >From a KWin perspective this change did not make much

Sorry for my ignorance. When I create xen virtual machines on lvm I need to create a filesystem on lvm container? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I'm please to announce libguestfs 1.36, a library and a set of tools for accessing and modifying virtual machine disk images. This release represents about 7 months of work by many contributors. I'd like to call out in particular substantial code contributions from: Pino Toscano, Tomáš Golembiovský, Cédric Bosdonnat, Roman Kagan, Dawid Zamirski and Matteo Cafasso. Also our testing team:

The Wine development release 1.3.33 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Support for text output in the DIB engine. - Improved support for HTTP proxies. - New version of the Gecko engine. - A number of cursor fixes. - Some fixes in bidirectional text layout. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations:

Hello, I've been consistently attempting to make the setup mentioned in the subject work on the following hardware: Xeon E3 1275 (v1, Sandy Bridge) Asus P8B WS (Firmware: 0904 and 2009) 16 GB RAM Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 OC (Firmware: 015.013.000.010.000705) Linux 3.4.1 dom0, x86-64, pvops. Xen 4.1.2 (+ security patch) and 4.1.3-rc1. Old qemu-dm setup. (not new mainline qemu) Windows 7 64-bit

Hi, This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. The first part of the series is some small changes to the core kernel. Apart from the new code added in "Allocate and free vmalloc areas" (posted many times before), they are simply a few one-liners

Hi, This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. The first part of the series is some small changes to the core kernel. Apart from the new code added in "Allocate and free vmalloc areas" (posted many times before), they are simply a few one-liners

Hi, This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. The first part of the series is some small changes to the core kernel. Apart from the new code added in "Allocate and free vmalloc areas" (posted many times before), they are simply a few one-liners