search for: incosistency

On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:27:27 GMT, Jorge Luis Ojeda Cabrera <jojeda@posta.unizar.es> wrote in message <20010925.12272700@macdesp8.unizar.es>: >When fitting model 'y~1', the 'lm' response is ok, but it is not possible >to get predictions using 'predict'. May be this is a bug, at least i >think it is somehow >inconsistent. It still appears in 1.3.1,

When fitting model 'y~1', the 'lm' response is ok, but it is not possible to get predictions using 'predict'. May be this is a bug, at least i think it is somehow inconsistent. > rm(list=ls()) > d <- data.frame(x=runif(50),y=rnorm(50)) > plot(d) > d.lm <- lm(y~1,data=d) > d.lm Call: lm(formula = y ~ 1, data = d) Coefficients: (Intercept)

Dear all, I am writing a vignette that requires a file which I am not allowed to distribute, but which the user can easily download manually. Moreover, it is not possible to download this file automatically from R: downloading requires a (free) registration that seems to work only through a browser. (I'm talking here about the MSigDB from the Broad Institute,

2015-05-28 10:40 GMT+03:00 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:33:48AM +0300, NoxDaFox wrote: > > To create the snapshots I'm using the libvirt command snapshotCreateXML > > with no flag set. Does libvirt support consistent snapshotting or shall I > > rely on QEMU backup new feature only? > > According to:

Hello all, I have a problem with an incosistent mdbox: Oct 24 10:43:23 two dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<...>, method=PLAIN, rip=..., lip=..., mpid=4977, TLS Oct 24 10:43:23 two dovecot: imap(listen at mjh.name): Error: mdbox map .../mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index corrupted: Unexpectedly lost INBOX uid=638 map_uid=809891 Oct 24 10:43:23 two dovecot: imap(listen at mjh.name): Error:

On 05/14/2015 04:33 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > On May 14, 2015 15:04, "January Weiner" <january.weiner at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> I am writing a vignette that requires a file which I am not allowed to >> distribute, but which the user can easily download manually. Moreover, it >> is not possible to download this file

On May 14, 2015 15:04, "January Weiner" <january.weiner at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am writing a vignette that requires a file which I am not allowed to > distribute, but which the user can easily download manually. Moreover, it > is not possible to download this file automatically from R: downloading > requires a (free) registration that seems to

The Centos website talks about a SPARC release, how is this coming on? and is there an approximate release date? Thanks Dean Plant

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:57:51AM +0300, NoxDaFox wrote: > 2015-05-28 10:40 GMT+03:00 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>: > > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:33:48AM +0300, NoxDaFox wrote: > > > To create the snapshots I'm using the libvirt command snapshotCreateXML > > > with no flag set. Does libvirt support consistent snapshotting or shall I > >

Hi all, I use libvirt-go in my agent to attach rbd volumes. I ofen suffer the issue of incosistent of domain dump xml and domain persistent xml file. For example, when I try to attach volume, the the domain by ?virConnectListAllDomains? api from libvirt tell me the vdf or 0x0a is empty, but when attach it with the vdf device or 0x0a address, qemu return the error duplicated with vdf or PCI

Hello, I''m creating my own Tumblr [tumblr.com] like rails app. It''s like a blog, but in this case a blog post could be of a certain type, i.e. a regular post, a video, a link, a photo, a song(info). Well now, it''s clear that they share a lot of similar functionality: title, created_at/updated_at, commentable, probably has an author_id, etc.. But besides that they are

2015-05-28 11:10 GMT+03:00 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:57:51AM +0300, NoxDaFox wrote: > > 2015-05-28 10:40 GMT+03:00 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>: > > > > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:33:48AM +0300, NoxDaFox wrote: > > > > To create the snapshots I'm using the libvirt command >

Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> writes: >> As LLVM is really a library it should behave like one and not just abort the >> whole process on an assert. > > This isn't Java; if we hit an assert, it's likely memory is in an > inconsistent state, so we don't want to try to recover. This over-used argument about "memory likely is in an inconsistent

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Aaron Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: > As LLVM is really a library it should behave like one and not just abort the > whole process on an assert. This isn't Java; if we hit an assert, it's likely memory is in an inconsistent state, so we don't want to try to recover. -Eli

2015-05-28 10:10 GMT+03:00 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:48:41AM +0300, NoxDaFox wrote: > > 2015-05-27 15:21 GMT+03:00 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>: > > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:38:38AM +0300, NoxDaFox wrote: > > > > * RuntimeError: file receive cancelled by daemon - On r = > > >

In my work with a simple localization plugin, i''m running into a lot of places in the Rails core, where text and other localization specific information is hardcoded. I''ve included some examples in the bottom of this post. It''s hard for an outsider to know, if the hardcoded values are a result of inconsistency in code, or "by design". I hope that we can have

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote: > From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> > > Add some ethtool stat items useful for performance analysis. > > Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> Series: Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Patch 1 seems appropriate for stable, even

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote: > From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> > > Add some ethtool stat items useful for performance analysis. > > Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> Series: Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Patch 1 seems appropriate for stable, even

Dear friends, I try configure a webmail on my server using Postfix + Dovecot + MySQL + Squirrelmail. My system is a Debian6 and dovecot version is: #dovecot --version 1.2.15 But, when I try to access an account on squirrel I recieve this message: ?ERROR Error connecting to IMAP server: localhost. 111 : Connection refused? Looking for a problem I foud this: #service dovecot start